A trade-off methodology for micro-launchers

被引:0
|
作者
Governale G. [1 ]
Rimani J. [1 ]
Viola N. [1 ]
Villace V.F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24, Turin
[2] European Space Agency (ESA), European Space Research and Technology Centre (ESTEC), Keplerlaan 1, Noordwijk
关键词
Conceptual modelling; Micro-launchers; Propulsion aerodynamics; Trade-off;
D O I
10.1007/s42401-021-00095-w
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The trend of cost-effective access to space and satellite technologies’ evolution is increasing the small satellite market. However, small payloads usually ride as piggyback, being a secondary passenger of a space vector, with very low flexibility in target orbit and launch schedule. The micro-launchers are designed to answer the needs of the small satellite missions, with a payload capacity up to 350 kg to Low Earth Orbit, aiming to low turn-over time and competitive prices. This paper explains the work performed by Politecnico di Torino in support of the ESA–ESTEC activities on micro-launchers. The aim is to provide preliminary guidelines for choosing and evaluating new innovative micro-launcher flight vehicle engineering processes. A trade-off methodology is proposed and defined based on the Analytically Hierarchical Process (AHP). This methodology considers, among other features, the flight profile, maximum payload, and physical characteristics. To support the trade-off analysis, a software tool is built for the automatic generation of the aerodynamics and propulsion parameters needed for the completion of the preliminary designs, enabling the performance estimation. The launcher’s performance models, with an analysis of the take-off sites and target orbits, are also produced. This allows the definition of performance maps where the maximum payload is graphed as a function of the orbit altitude and inclination. A set of innovative micro-launchers exploiting different technologies is also assessed as a case study. © 2021, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 226
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] TAX TRADE-OFF
    不详
    NATION, 1969, 208 (18) : 554 - 555
  • [32] A power-performance trade-off methodology for portable reconfigurable platforms
    Khan, J
    Sethuraman, B
    Vemuri, R
    ERSA '04: THE 2004 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING OF RECONFIGURABLE SYSTEMS AND ALGORITHMS, 2004, : 33 - 37
  • [33] Is the Quantity-Quality Trade-Off a Trade-Off for All, None, or Some?
    Millimet, Daniel L.
    Wang, Le
    ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND CULTURAL CHANGE, 2011, 60 (01) : 155 - 195
  • [34] CONSUMPTION-INVESTMENT TRADE-OFF, WAGE-PROFIT TRADE-OFF, AND TERMS OF TRADE
    SCHMITTRINK, G
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1979, 7 (10) : 955 - 960
  • [35] THE TRADE-OFF IS DEAD, LONG LIVE THE TRADE-OFF: PHELPS AND THE PHILLIPS CURVE
    Schwarzer, Johannes A.
    HISTORY OF ECONOMIC IDEAS, 2018, 26 (03) : 69 - 92
  • [36] Testing the "Nonstopping" Time Trade-Off: Is It Better Than the Composite Time Trade-Off?
    Luo, Nan
    Augestad, Liv
    Rand, Kim
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 (11) : 1489 - 1496
  • [37] BEYOND THE BIAS VARIANCE TRADE-OFF: A MUTUAL INFORMATION TRADE-OFF IN DEEP LEARNING
    Lan, Xinjie
    Zhu, Bin
    Boncelet, Charles
    Barner, Kenneth
    2021 IEEE 31ST INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON MACHINE LEARNING FOR SIGNAL PROCESSING (MLSP), 2021,
  • [38] A comparison of standard gamble, time trade-off, and adjusted time trade-off scores
    Martin, AJ
    Glasziou, PP
    Simes, RJ
    Lumley, T
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2000, 16 (01) : 137 - 147
  • [39] TOMSAC - Methodology for trade-off management between automotive safety and cyber security
    Sabaliauskaite, Giedre
    Bryans, Jeremy
    Jadidbonab, Hesamaldin
    Ahmad, Farhan
    Shaikh, Siraj
    Wooderson, Paul
    COMPUTERS & SECURITY, 2024, 140
  • [40] A Methodology to Compare Anonymization Methods Regarding Their Risk-Utility Trade-off
    Domingo-Ferrer, Josep
    Ricci, Sara
    Soria-Comas, Jordi
    MODELING DECISIONS FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (MDAI 2017), 2017, 10571 : 132 - 143