A trade-off methodology for micro-launchers

被引:0
|
作者
Governale G. [1 ]
Rimani J. [1 ]
Viola N. [1 ]
Villace V.F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24, Turin
[2] European Space Agency (ESA), European Space Research and Technology Centre (ESTEC), Keplerlaan 1, Noordwijk
关键词
Conceptual modelling; Micro-launchers; Propulsion aerodynamics; Trade-off;
D O I
10.1007/s42401-021-00095-w
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The trend of cost-effective access to space and satellite technologies’ evolution is increasing the small satellite market. However, small payloads usually ride as piggyback, being a secondary passenger of a space vector, with very low flexibility in target orbit and launch schedule. The micro-launchers are designed to answer the needs of the small satellite missions, with a payload capacity up to 350 kg to Low Earth Orbit, aiming to low turn-over time and competitive prices. This paper explains the work performed by Politecnico di Torino in support of the ESA–ESTEC activities on micro-launchers. The aim is to provide preliminary guidelines for choosing and evaluating new innovative micro-launcher flight vehicle engineering processes. A trade-off methodology is proposed and defined based on the Analytically Hierarchical Process (AHP). This methodology considers, among other features, the flight profile, maximum payload, and physical characteristics. To support the trade-off analysis, a software tool is built for the automatic generation of the aerodynamics and propulsion parameters needed for the completion of the preliminary designs, enabling the performance estimation. The launcher’s performance models, with an analysis of the take-off sites and target orbits, are also produced. This allows the definition of performance maps where the maximum payload is graphed as a function of the orbit altitude and inclination. A set of innovative micro-launchers exploiting different technologies is also assessed as a case study. © 2021, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 226
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fault-tolerant Optimal Control Scheme for Satellite Micro-launchers
    Reitu, Alexandra
    Sperila, Andrei
    Ciubotaru, Bogdan D.
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2020, 53 (02): : 4115 - 4120
  • [2] Time trade-off: one methodology, different methods
    Attema, Arthur E.
    Edelaar-Peeters, Yvette
    Versteegh, Matthijs M.
    Stolk, Elly A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2013, 14 : S53 - S64
  • [3] A systematic review of the methodology of trade-off analysis in agriculture
    Breure, Timo S.
    Estrada-Carmona, Natalia
    Petsakos, Athanasios
    Gotor, Elisabetta
    Jansen, Boris
    Groot, Jeroen C. J.
    [J]. NATURE FOOD, 2024, 5 (03): : 211 - 220
  • [4] Time trade-off: one methodology, different methods
    Arthur E. Attema
    Yvette Edelaar-Peeters
    Matthijs M. Versteegh
    Elly A. Stolk
    [J]. The European Journal of Health Economics, 2013, 14 : 53 - 64
  • [5] A systematic review of the methodology of trade-off analysis in agriculture
    Timo S. Breure
    Natalia Estrada-Carmona
    Athanasios Petsakos
    Elisabetta Gotor
    Boris Jansen
    Jeroen C. J. Groot
    [J]. Nature Food, 2024, 5 : 211 - 220
  • [6] The trade-off
    Rothschild, M
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS NEWS, 2004, 41 (09): : 19 - 21
  • [7] NO TRADE-OFF
    NICOLINI, M
    [J]. NATION, 1977, 224 (20) : 610 - 610
  • [8] TRADE-OFF
    MANKIW, NG
    [J]. NEW REPUBLIC, 1991, 204 (13) : 4 - 4
  • [9] Uncertainty trade-off and disturbance trade-off for quantum measurements
    Srinivas, M. D.
    Mandayam, Prabha
    [J]. CURRENT SCIENCE, 2015, 109 (11): : 2044 - 2051
  • [10] A methodology for hardware architecture trade-off at different levels of abstraction
    Schneider, C
    [J]. EUROPEAN DESIGN & TEST CONFERENCE - ED&TC 97, PROCEEDINGS, 1997, : 537 - 541