Triclosan removal in wetlands constructed with different aquatic plants

被引:0
|
作者
Jianing Liu
Jingmin Wang
Congcong Zhao
Anthony G. Hay
Huijun Xie
Jian Zhan
机构
[1] Shandong University,Environment Research Institute
[2] Shandong Institute for Product Quality Inspection,School of Environmental Science and Engineering
[3] Shandong University,Department of Microbiology
[4] Cornell University,undefined
来源
关键词
Constructed wetlands; Triclosan; Sediment adsorption; Plant uptake; Microbial degradation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Triclosan (TCS) is widely used in consumer products as an antimicrobial agent. Constructed wetlands have the potential for TCS removal, but knowledge about the relative importance of sediment, plants, and microbes is limited. TCS removal performance was investigated in well-operated constructed wetlands planted with three different types of aquatic plants: emergent Cattail (C-T), submerged Hornwort (H-T), and floating Lemnaminor (L-T). Results showed that the TCS removal efficiencies from water were all greater than 97 %. Maximal TCS adsorption to sediment in the C-T wetland (13.8 ± 0.6 ng/g) was significantly lower than in the H-T wetland (21.0 ± 0.3 ng/g) or the L-T wetland (21.4 ± 0.6 ng/g). The maximal TCS concentrations in plants were 5.7 ± 0.2 and 7.2 ± 0.5 μg/g for H-T and L-T, respectively, and it was below the minimal detection limit (MDL) in C-T. Deep 16S rRNA gene sequencing results revealed that C-T wetland had the highest community richness and diversity. Some bacteria, like beta-Proteobacteria, gamma-Proteobacteria, and Bacteroidetes were detected and might have significant correlations with TCS degradation. Overall, with regard to soils, plants, and microorganism, accumulation in sediment and plants in H-T and L-T was high, while in C-T biodegradation likely played an important role.
引用
收藏
页码:1459 / 1467
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Removal of organochlorine pesticides in constructed wetlands
    Li, Hong
    Zeng, Hong-Hu
    Liang, Yan-Peng
    Zeng, Hong-Hu
    Liang, Yan-Peng
    [J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014, 692 : 40 - 43
  • [42] Atenolol removal in microcosm constructed wetlands
    Dordio, Ana
    Pinto, Jose
    Dias, Cristina Barrocas
    Pinto, Ana Paula
    Palace Carvalho, Alfredo J.
    Teixeira, Dora Martins
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2009, 89 (8-12) : 835 - 848
  • [43] Phosphorus removal in small constructed wetlands dominated by submersed aquatic vegetation in South Florida, USA
    Gu, Binhe
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLANT ECOLOGY, 2008, 1 (01) : 67 - 74
  • [44] DESIGNING CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS FOR NITROGEN REMOVAL
    HAMMER, DA
    KNIGHT, RL
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1994, 29 (04) : 15 - 27
  • [45] Chromium removal in constructed wetlands: A review
    Sultana, Mar-Yam
    Akratos, Christos S.
    Pavlou, Stavros
    Vayenas, Dimitrios V.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL BIODETERIORATION & BIODEGRADATION, 2014, 96 : 181 - 190
  • [46] Constructed wetlands for boron removal: A review
    Turker, Onur Can
    Vymazal, Jan
    Ture, Cengiz
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 64 : 350 - 359
  • [47] Removal processes for arsenic in constructed wetlands
    Lizama, Katherine A.
    Fletcher, Tim D.
    Sun, Guangzhi
    [J]. CHEMOSPHERE, 2011, 84 (08) : 1032 - 1043
  • [48] Constructed wetlands as an alternative for arsenic removal
    Corroto, C. E.
    Iriel, A.
    Calderon, E.
    Fernadez-Cirelli, A.
    Perez Carrera, A. L.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ARSENIC IN A CHANGING WORLD (AS2018), 2018, : 493 - 495
  • [49] Removal of metals in constructed wetlands: Review
    Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National Univ. of Kaohsiung, Kaohsiung 811, Taiwan
    [J]. Pract. Period. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste Manage., 2008, 2 (96-101):
  • [50] Bioconcentration of triclosan, methyl-triclosan, and triclocarban in the plants and sediments of a constructed wetland
    Zarate, Frederick M., Jr.
    Schulwitz, Sarah E.
    Stevens, Kevin J.
    Venables, Barney J.
    [J]. CHEMOSPHERE, 2012, 88 (03) : 323 - 329