In a standard two-country international macro model, the paper asks whether imposing restrictions on international noncontingent borrowing and lending is ever desirable. The answer is yes. If one country imposes capital controls unilaterally, it can generate favorable changes in the dynamics of equilibrium interest rates and the terms of trade, and thereby benefit at the expense of its trading partner. If both countries simultaneously impose capital controls, the welfare effects are ambiguous. The paper identifies calibrations in which symmetric capital controls improve terms-of-trade insurance against country-specific shocks and thereby increase welfare for both countries.
机构:
Department of Economics, Eitan Berglas School of Economics, Tel-Aviv UniversityDepartment of Economics, Eitan Berglas School of Economics, Tel-Aviv University
机构:
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz Univ, Coll Sci & Humanities Al Sulail, Dept Business Adm, Al Sulail, Saudi ArabiaPrince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz Univ, Coll Sci & Humanities Al Sulail, Dept Business Adm, Al Sulail, Saudi Arabia