Preliminary Moho depth determination from receiver function analysis using AlpArray stations in Hungary

被引:0
|
作者
Dániel Kalmár
Bálint Süle
István Bondár
机构
[1] Eötvös Loránd University,Department of Geophysics and Space Science, Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences
[2] Hungarian Academy of Sciences (MTA CSFK GGI KRSZO),Kövesligethy Radó Seismological Observatory, Geodetic and Geophysical Institute, Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences
来源
关键词
Pannonian Basin; AlpArray project; Receiver function analysis; Moho discontinuity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Receiver function analysis is applied to the western part of the Pannonian Basin, a rather complex region both geologically and geodynamically. Previous receiver function analyses in this region had to deal with much smaller station density and time span than those available to us. In the analysis we used the data of some 48 seismological stations. These include not only the permanent stations from Hungary and permanent stations from neighbouring countries (Slovakia and Slovenia), but also the temporary broadband stations that were installed within the framework of the AlpArray project. Having applied rather strict manual quality control on the calculated radial receiver functions we stacked the receiver functions. Using the H–K grid search method we determined the Moho depth and the Vp/Vs ratio beneath the seismological stations in the western part of the Pannonian Basin. The unprecedented density of the AlpArray network, combined with the permanent stations, allowed us to derive high resolution Moho and Vp/Vs maps for the West Pannonian Basin, together with uncertainty estimates. Our preliminary results agree well with previous studies and complement them with finer details on the Moho topography and crustal thickness.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 321
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Moho depth and Poisson's ratio in the Western-Central Alps from receiver functions
    Lombardi, D.
    Braunmiller, J.
    Kissling, E.
    Giardini, D.
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 173 (01) : 249 - 264
  • [32] Constraints on average Taiwan Reference Moho Discontinuity Model-receiver function analysis using BATS data
    Wang, Hsiao-Lan
    Chen, How-Wei
    Zhu, Lupei
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 183 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [33] Moho depth (crustal thickness) variations under the northeastern midcontinent of North America, based on H-κ- c receiver-function analysis
    Xiao, Hongyu
    Marshak, Stephen
    Delucia, Michael
    Song, Xiaodong
    EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 2025, 658
  • [34] DETERMINATION OF DIP AND STRIKE OF MOHO FROM ARRAY ANALYSIS
    HAVSKOV, J
    KANASEWICH, ER
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1978, 68 (05) : 1415 - 1419
  • [35] A preliminary study of crustal structure in Taiwan region using receiver function analysis
    Kim, KH
    Chiu, JM
    Kao, H
    Liu, QY
    Yeh, YH
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 159 (01) : 146 - 164
  • [36] DETERMINATION OF DIP AND STRIKE OF MOHO FROM ARRAY ANALYSIS
    HAVSKOV, J
    KANASEWICH, ER
    TRANSACTIONS-AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 1978, 59 (12): : 1039 - 1039
  • [37] Moho depth variation in the Baltic Shield from analysis of converted waves
    Olsson, Sverker
    Roberts, Roland G.
    Bodvarssoni, Reynir
    GFF, 2008, 130 : 113 - 122
  • [38] Geometry of the Main Himalayan Thrust and Moho beneath Satluj valley, northwest Himalaya: Constraints from receiver function analysis
    Hazarika, Devajit
    Wadhawan, Monika
    Paul, Arpita
    Kumar, Naresh
    Borah, Kajaljyoti
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2017, 122 (04) : 2929 - 2945
  • [39] Moho imaging based on receiver function analysis with teleseismic wavefield reconstruction: Application to South China
    Song, Penghan
    Zhang, Xuemei
    Liu, Youshan
    Teng, Jiwen
    TECTONOPHYSICS, 2017, 718 : 118 - 131
  • [40] Systematic Receiver Function Analysis of the Moho Geometry in the Southern California Plate-Boundary Region
    Ozakin, Yaman
    Ben-Zion, Yehuda
    PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2015, 172 (05) : 1167 - 1184