The US Supreme Court has gutted federal protection for wetlands — now what?

被引：0

作者：

Royal C. Gardner

机构：

来源：

Nature | 2023年 / 618卷 / 7964期

关键词：

Government; Policy; Law; Environmental sciences;

D O I：

10.1038/d41586-023-01827-y

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Most US wetlands just lost federal protection, but there’s still time for state and local governments to act. Scientists and the public can help.

引用

页码：215 / 215

共 50 条

[1] What the US Supreme Court decision means for wetlands
Gardner, Royal C.
NATURE, 2023, 618 (7964) : 215 - 215
[2] WHAT HAS SUPREME COURT TAUGHT
MCLAUGHLIN, JA
WEST VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW, 1970, 72 (1-2): : 1 - 32
[3] The US Supreme Court and the Centralization of Federal Authority
Somin, Ilya
PUBLIUS-THE JOURNAL OF FEDERALISM, 2019, 49 (04) : 1 - 5
[4] The doctrine of equivalents lives - US Supreme Court reverses federal court
Silverman, AB
JOM-JOURNAL OF THE MINERALS METALS & MATERIALS SOCIETY, 2002, 54 (08): : 64 - 64
[5] Supreme Court limits federal government's efforts to regulate wetlands
Kegler, Brown, Hill and Ritter, Columbus, OH
不详
不详
Water Well J, 2006, 9 (42-44):
[6] Supreme court has a chance to redefine innovation protection
ENR (Engineering News-Record), 2009, 263 (04):
[7] US Supreme Court to decide what is patentable
Harrison, Charlotte
NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2009, 8 (03) : 186 - 187
[8] Privacy protection in the US Supreme Court and the German Federal Constitutional Court: perspectives for a cross-border constitutionalism dialogue
Martins de Araujo, Luis Claudio
Branco de Lacerda Marca da Rocha, Luiz Augusto Castello
QUAESTIO IURIS, 2022, 15 (01): : 171 - 196
[9] WHAT HAS SUPREME COURT TAUGHT .2.
MCLAUGHLIN, JA
WEST VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW, 1970, 72 (04): : 326 - 397
[10] Constitutional courts in comparison: The US supreme court and the German federal constitutional court
Miller, R
ICON-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 2004, 2 (03): : 568 - 573

← 1 2 3 4 5 →