Simulating surface energy fluxes using the variable-resolution Community Earth System Model (VR-CESM)

被引:0
|
作者
Elizabeth A. Burakowski
Ahmed Tawfik
Andrew Ouimette
Lucie Lepine
Colin Zarzycki
Kimberly Novick
Scott Ollinger
Gordon Bonan
机构
[1] National Center for Atmospheric Research,Climate and Global Dynamics Division
[2] University of New Hampshire,Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space
[3] Indiana University,School of Public and Environmental Affairs
来源
Theoretical and Applied Climatology | 2019年 / 138卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Recent advances in variable-resolution (VR) global models provide the tools necessary to investigate local and global impacts of land cover by embedding a high-resolution grid over areas of interest in a seamless and computationally efficient manner. We used two eddy covariance tower clusters in the Eastern USA to evaluate surface energy fluxes (latent heat, λE; sensible heat, H; net radiation, Rn; and ground heat, G) and surface properties (aerodynamic resistance to heat transfer, raero; Bowen ratio, β; and albedo, α) by uncoupled point simulations of the land-only Community Land Model (PTCLM4.5) and two coupled land–atmosphere Community Earth System Model (CESM1.3) simulations. The CESM simulations included a 1° uniform grid global simulation and global 1° simulation with a 0.25° refined VR grid over the Eastern USA. Tower clusters included the following plant functional types—broadleaf deciduous temperate (hardwood) forest, C3 non-Arctic grass (grass), a cropland, and needleleaf evergreen temperate (pine) forest. During the growing season, diurnal cycles of λE and H for grass and the cropland were simulated well by PTCLM4.5 and VR-CESM1.3; however, λE (H) was biased low (high) at the hardwood and pine forested sites, contributing to biases in β. Growing season Rn was generally well simulated by CLM4.5 and VR-CESM1.3; however, modeled elevated albedo (indicative of snow cover) persisted longer in winter and spring leading to large biases in Rn and α. The introduction of a VR grid does not adversely impact surface energy fluxes compared to 1° uniform grids and highlights the usefulness of this approach for future efforts to predict land–atmosphere fluxes across heterogeneous landscapes.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 133
页数:18
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [21] Improving Urban Climate Adaptation Modeling in the Community Earth System Model (CESM) Through Transient Urban Surface Albedo Representation
    Sun, Yuan
    Fang, Bowen
    Oleson, Keith W.
    Zhao, Lei
    Topping, David O.
    Schultz, David M.
    Zheng, Zhonghua
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2024, 16 (12)
  • [22] Running climate model on a commercial cloud computing environment: A case study using Community Earth System Model (CESM) on Amazon AWS
    Chen, Xiuhong
    Huang, Xianglei
    Jiao, Chaoyi
    Flanner, Mark G.
    Raeker, Todd
    Palen, Brock
    COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2017, 98 : 21 - 25
  • [23] Impacts of Model Horizontal Resolution on Mean Sea Surface Temperature Biases in the Community Earth System Model
    Xu, Gaopeng
    Chang, Ping
    Ramachandran, Sanjiv
    Danabasoglu, Gokhan
    Yeager, Stephen
    Small, Justin
    Zhang, Qiuying
    Jing, Zhao
    Wu, Lixin
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2022, 127 (12)
  • [24] Impact of air-sea coupling on the simulated global tropical cyclone activity in the high-resolution Community Earth System Model (CESM)
    Li, Hui
    Sriver, Ryan L.
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2019, 53 (7-8) : 3731 - 3750
  • [25] Improvements in Wintertime Surface Temperature Variability in the Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2) Related to the Representation of Snow Density
    Simpson, Isla R.
    Lawrence, David M.
    Swenson, Sean C.
    Hannay, Cecile
    McKinnon, Karen A.
    Truesdale, John E.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2022, 14 (04)
  • [26] Assessing the Atmospheric Response to Subgrid Surface Heterogeneity in the Single-Column Community Earth System Model, Version 2 (CESM2)
    Fowler, Megan D.
    Neale, Richard B.
    Waterman, Tyler
    Lawrence, David M.
    Dirmeyer, Paul A.
    Larson, Vincent E.
    Huang, Meng
    Simon, Jason S.
    Truesdale, John
    Chaney, Nathaniel W.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [27] Enhancing Urban Climate-Energy Modeling in the Community Earth System Model (CESM) Through Explicit Representation of Urban Air-Conditioning Adoption
    Li, Xinchang Cathy
    Zhao, Lei
    Oleson, Keith
    Zhou, Yuyu
    Qin, Yue
    Zhang, Keer
    Fang, Bowen
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2024, 16 (04)
  • [28] Simulating the surface energy balance over two contrasting urban environments using the Community Land Model Urban
    Demuzere, Matthias
    Oleson, Keith
    Coutts, Andrew M.
    Pigeon, Gregoire
    van Lipzig, Nicole P. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2013, 33 (15) : 3182 - 3205
  • [29] Simulating surface warming in Earth's three polar regions during the Middle Miocene Climatic Optimum using isotopic and non-isotopic versions of the Community Earth System Model
    Sun, Yong
    Ding, Lin
    Su, Baohuang
    Stepanek, Christian
    Ramstein, Gilles
    PALAEOGEOGRAPHY PALAEOCLIMATOLOGY PALAEOECOLOGY, 2024, 643
  • [30] Global Sensitivity Analysis Using the Ultra-Low Resolution Energy Exascale Earth System Model
    Tezaur, Irina
    Peterson, Kara
    Powell, Amy
    Jakeman, John
    Roesler, Erika
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2022, 14 (08)