Renal artery assessment with non-enhanced MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography: comparison between 1.5 and 3.0 T

被引：0
|
作者：
Xiaoxia Guo
Ying Gong
Zhiyuan Wu
Fuhua Yan
Xiaoyi Ding
Xueqin Xu
机构：
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Department of Interventional Radiology, Ruijin Hospital
[2] Children’s Hospital of Fudan University,Department of Radiology
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital
来源：
European Radiology | 2020年 / 30卷
关键词：
Renal artery obstruction; Magnetic resonance angiography; Angiography, digital subtraction;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：1747 / 1754
页数：7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quantitative assessment of carotid artery stenosis: Comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography
    Wintersperger, BJ
    Huber, AM
    Holzknecht, NG
    Helmberger, TK
    Billing, A
    Reiser, MF
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 298 - 298
  • [32] Non-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of unruptured intracranial aneurysms at 7 Tesla: Comparison with digital subtraction angiography
    Wrede, Karsten H.
    Matsushige, Toshinori
    Goericke, Sophia L.
    Chen, Bixia
    Umutlu, Lale
    Quick, Harald H.
    Ladd, Mark E.
    Johst, Soeren
    Forsting, Michael
    Sure, Ulrich
    Schlamann, Marc
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (01) : 354 - 364
  • [33] Non-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of unruptured intracranial aneurysms at 7 Tesla: Comparison with digital subtraction angiography
    Karsten H. Wrede
    Toshinori Matsushige
    Sophia L. Goericke
    Bixia Chen
    Lale Umutlu
    Harald H. Quick
    Mark E. Ladd
    Sören Johst
    Michael Forsting
    Ulrich Sure
    Marc Schlamann
    European Radiology, 2017, 27 : 354 - 364
  • [34] Vertebral Artery Ostial Stenosis: Prevalence by Digital Subtraction Angiography, MR Angiography, and CT Angiography
    Dundamadappa, Sathish Kumar
    Cauley, Keith
    JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING, 2013, 23 (03) : 360 - 367
  • [35] Renal artery stenosis: Detection and quantification with spiral CT angiography versus optimized digital subtraction angiography
    Kaatee, R
    Beek, FJA
    deLange, EE
    vanLeeuwen, MS
    Smits, HFM
    vanderVen, PJG
    Beutler, JJ
    Mali, WPTM
    RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 (01) : 121 - 127
  • [36] MR angiography of the great anterior radiculomedullary artery (Adamkiewicz artery) validated by digital subtraction angiography
    Nijenhuis, R. J.
    Mull, M.
    Wilmink, J. T.
    Thron, A. K.
    Backes, W. H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2006, 27 (07) : 1565 - 1572
  • [37] Arteriovenous malformations: Assessment by MR digital subtraction angiography
    Griffiths, PD
    Warren, DJ
    Hoggard, N
    Anderson, B
    Romanowski, CA
    Wilkinson, ID
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 214 (02) : 612 - 612
  • [38] Renal artery stenosis: Evaluation with conventional angiography versus gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography
    Gilfeather, M
    Yoon, HC
    Siegelman, ES
    Axel, L
    Stolpen, AH
    Shlansky-Goldberg, RD
    Baum, RA
    Soulen, MC
    Schnall, MD
    RADIOLOGY, 1999, 210 (02) : 367 - 372
  • [39] Cardiac cine MRI: Comparison of 1.5 T, non-enhanced 3.0 T and blood pool enhanced 3.0 T imaging
    Gerretsen, S. C.
    Versluis, B.
    Bekkers, S. C. A. M.
    Leiner, T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2008, 65 (01) : 80 - 85
  • [40] Coronary MR angiography at 3.0 T versus that at 1.5 T:: Initial results in patients suspected of having coronary artery disease
    Sommer, T
    Hackenbroch, M
    Hofer, U
    Schmiedel, A
    Willinek, WA
    Flacke, S
    Gieseke, J
    Träber, F
    Fimmers, R
    Litt, H
    Schild, H
    RADIOLOGY, 2005, 234 (03) : 718 - 725
12345