Assessing the effectiveness of a national protected area network for carnivore conservation

被引:0
|
作者
J. Terraube
J. Van doninck
P. Helle
M. Cabeza
机构
[1] University of Helsinki,Global Change and Conservation Lab, Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Program. Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences
[2] University of Turku,Amazon Research Team, Department of Biology
[3] Natural Resources Research Institute,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Protected areas (PAs) are essential to prevent further biodiversity loss yet their effectiveness varies largely with governance and external threats. Although methodological advances have permitted assessments of PA effectiveness in mitigating deforestation, we still lack similar studies for the impact of PAs on wildlife populations. Here we use an innovative combination of matching methods and hurdle-mixed models with a large-scale and long-term dataset for Finland’s large carnivore species. We show that the national PA network does not support higher densities than non-protected habitat for 3 of the 4 species investigated. For some species, PA effects interact with region or time, i.e., wolverine densities decreased inside PAs over the study period and lynx densities increased inside eastern PAs. We support the application of matching methods in combination of additional analytical frameworks for deeper understanding of conservation impacts on wildlife populations. These methodological advances are crucial for preparing ambitious PA targets post-2020.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sustainable financing of a national Marine Protected Area network in Fiji
    Ison, Sierra
    Hills, Jeremy
    Morris, Cherie
    Stead, Selina M.
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 163 : 352 - 363
  • [32] Protected Area Network Expansion and Management: Economics to improve conservation outcomes
    Albers, Heidi J.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2022, 83 (04): : 955 - 972
  • [33] Protected Area Network Expansion and Management: Economics to improve conservation outcomes
    Heidi J. Albers
    [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2022, 83 : 955 - 972
  • [34] Amphibian hotspots in Iran: Effectiveness of current protected area and priorities for conservation planning
    Ghaffari, Hanyeh
    Safaei-Mahroo, Barbod
    Niamir, Aidin
    [J]. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2024, 54
  • [35] Projected impact of climate change on the effectiveness of the existing protected area network for biodiversity conservation within Yunnan Province, China
    Zomer, Robert J.
    Xu, Jianchu
    Wang, Mingcheng
    Trabucco, Antonio
    Li, Zhuoqing
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2015, 184 : 335 - 345
  • [36] Assessing Local Indigenous Knowledge and Information Sources on Biodiversity, Conservation and Protected Area Management at Khuvsgol Lake National Park, Mongolia
    McCarthy, Christopher
    Shinjo, Hitoshi
    Hoshino, Buho
    Enkhjargal, Erdenebuyan
    [J]. LAND, 2018, 7 (04)
  • [37] Assessing protected area effectiveness using surrounding (buffer) areas environmentally similar to the target area
    Mas, JF
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2005, 105 (1-3) : 69 - 80
  • [38] Assessing protected area effectiveness using surrounding (buffer) areas environmentally similar to the target area
    Jean-François Mas
    [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2005, 105 : 69 - 80
  • [39] Designing protected area networks that translate international conservation commitments into national action
    Bicknell, Jake E.
    Collins, Murray B.
    Pickles, Rob S. A.
    McCann, Niall P.
    Bernard, Curtis R.
    Fernandes, Damian J.
    Miller, Mark G. R.
    James, Samantha M.
    William, Aiesha U.
    Struebig, Matthew J.
    Davies, Zoe G.
    Smith, Robert J.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2017, 214 : 168 - 175
  • [40] Effects of national conservation spending and amount of protected area on species threat rates
    McKinney, ML
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2002, 16 (02) : 539 - 543