Evidence of long-distance dispersal of a gray wolf from the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone

被引:0
|
作者
Michael E. Byrne
Sarah C. Webster
Stacey L. Lance
Cara N. Love
Thomas G. Hinton
Dmitry Shamovich
James C. Beasley
机构
[1] University of Georgia,Savannah River Ecology Laboratory
[2] University of Missouri,School of Natural Resources
[3] University of Georgia,Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources
[4] University of Georgia,Odum School of Ecology
[5] Fukushima University,Institute of Environmental Radioactivity
来源
关键词
Animal movement; Chernobyl; Contamination; Dispersal; GPS telemetry;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Chernobyl Exclusion Zone (CEZ) is a ~ 4300 km2 area in Belarus and Ukraine that remains heavily contaminated with radiation from the nuclear accident of 1986. Long standing controversy persists on the fate of wildlife within the CEZ following human abandonment of the area. Human residency remains extremely sparse, and the CEZ has become a refuge for some populations of wildlife, including gray wolves (Canis lupus). Using GPS telemetry, we documented the first long-distance movements of a young (1–2 years) male wolf from the CEZ into the surrounding landscape. The wolf traveled 369 km from its home range center over a 21-day period in February 2015. In the 95 days prior to dispersal, the wolf maintained a home range of ~ 28 km2, with daily displacements rarely exceeding 5 km. With the onset of dispersal, daily displacement increased to a mean of 16.8 km. The dispersal of a young wolf is an important observation because it suggests that the CEZ may serve as a source for some wildlife populations outside of the CEZ, and raises questions about the potential spread of radiation-induced genetic mutations to populations in uncontaminated areas.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EVIDENCE OF LONG-DISTANCE DISPERSAL IN THE COMMON SHREW - (SOREX-ARANEUS)
    TEGELSTROM, H
    HANSSON, L
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SAUGETIERKUNDE-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MAMMALIAN BIOLOGY, 1987, 52 (01): : 52 - 54
  • [22] Evidence for long-distance dispersal in a sedentary passerine, Gymnorhina tibicen (Artamidae)
    Baker, AM
    Mather, PB
    Hughes, JM
    BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 2001, 72 (02) : 333 - 342
  • [23] Long-distance mutual exclusion for planning
    Chen, Yikin
    Huang, Ruoyun
    Xing, Zhao
    Zhang, Weixiong
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2009, 173 (02) : 365 - 391
  • [24] Long-distance dispersal in Odonata: Examples from arid Namibia
    Suhling, Frank
    Martens, Andreas
    Suhling, Ida
    AUSTRAL ECOLOGY, 2017, 42 (05) : 544 - 552
  • [25] From the Neotropics to the Namib: evidence for rapid ecological divergence following extreme long-distance dispersal
    Gildenhuys, Enelge
    Ellis, Allan G.
    Carroll, Scott
    Le Roux, Johannes J.
    BOTANICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 2015, 179 (03) : 477 - 486
  • [26] Evidence of individual discrimination in the maned wolf long-distance extended-bark
    Balieiro, Flora
    Monticelli, Patricia Ferreira
    BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2019, 158 : 219 - 227
  • [27] Long-distance dispersal of tree seeds by wind
    Horn, HS
    Nathan, R
    Kaplan, SR
    ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2001, 16 (05) : 877 - 885
  • [28] Evidence that long-distance dispersal of aquatic invertebrates by ducks increases with propagule size
    Santamaria, Luis
    Charalambidou, Iris
    Viana, Duarte
    van Donk, Ellen
    FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2023, 68 (09) : 1530 - 1541
  • [29] Empirical Evidence of Long-Distance Dispersal in Miscanthus sinensis and Miscanthus X giganteus
    Quinn, Lauren D.
    Matlaga, David P.
    Stewart, J. Ryan
    Davis, Adam S.
    INVASIVE PLANT SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 4 (01) : 142 - 150
  • [30] Evolutionary consequences of long-distance dispersal in mosquitoes
    Schmidt, Thomas L.
    CURRENT OPINION IN INSECT SCIENCE, 2025, 68