Stress and Urgency Urinary Incontinence: Clinical-Urodynamic Correlation and Rehabilitation Management in Daily Clinical Practice

被引:0
|
作者
Marcos Edgar Fernández-Cuadros
María Jesús Albaladejo-Florín
Sandra Álava-Rabasa
Olga Susana Pérez-Moro
María Fernanda Lorenzo-Gómez
机构
[1] Servicio de Rehabilitación y Medicina Física,Servicio de Urología
[2] Hospital Universitario Santa Cristina,undefined
[3] Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca,undefined
关键词
Urinary incontinence; Urodynamics; Neuromodulation; Posterior tibial nerve; Biofeedback; Pelvic floor muscle training;
D O I
10.1007/s42399-022-01231-z
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
(a) To correlate the clinical with the urodynamic diagnosis in a series of patients with UUI (urgency urinary incontinence) and SUI (stress urinary incontinence); (b) establish age, clinical and urodynamic differences; and (c) demonstrate the effectiveness of individualized rehabilitation treatment based on the clinical-urodynamic diagnosis in patients with SUI and UUI in the daily clinical practice of a third-level rehabilitation service. Retrospective study of 60 patients with SUI and UUI. Urodynamic study: (a) free flowmetry; (b) filling cystomanometry; (c) pressure-flow study. Outcome variables: daytime (DUF) and nighttime (NUF) urinary frequency, strength of the pelvic floor muscles (PFM) measured by manometry (maximum and mean pressure), and use of absorbents/day. Rehabilitation treatment: (a) pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT); (b) biofeedback (BFB), transcutaneous neuromodulation of the posterior tibial nerve (TTNM). Age, clinical, and urodynamic differences have been observed between patients with UUI versus SUI. UUI is more frequent in older patients (UUI 67.3 ± 10.19 years vs SUI 58.6 ± 8.54 years), p = 0.0028. Patients with UUI, when compared with patients with SUI, present more episodes of DUF (7.7 ± 5.1 vs 5.5 ± 3.99) and NUF (2.51 ± 1.67 vs 1.46 ± 1.42). Patients with SUI use more absorbents/day than patients with UUI (2.7 ± 1.53 vs 1.37 ± 1.5), p = 0.0243. The urodynamic study (UDS) confirmed the clinical diagnosis in UUI in 64.7%, while in SUI, it was only confirmed in 35.1%. In the urodynamic analysis (free flowmetry), patients with UUI have smaller bladders than patients with SUI (voiding volume in UUI 275.8 ± 178.95 vs 411.03 ± 203.62 in SUI), p = 0.083. The maximum flow (Qmax) is higher in patients with SUI compared to UUI (19.6 ± 7.07 vs 16.06 ± 8.54), p = 0.0836. In filling cystomanometry, the bladders of patients with UUI are smaller than those with SUI (bladder capacity UUI 266.3 ± 52.76 vs 308.6 ± 49.72 ml in SUI), p = 0.023. In SUI, the BFB/PFMT significantly improved DUF, NUF, PFM pressure, and absorbent use. In UUI, the BFB plus TTNM improved DUF, NUF, and the maximum and mean PFM pressure with statistical difference, while the use of absorbents decreased with a tendency to significance. There are age, clinical, manometric, and urodynamic differences in patients with UUI when compared with patients with SUI. UUI occurs in older patients; they present a greater number of daytime and nocturnal urinary frequency episodes and use fewer absorbents than patients with SUI. Patients with UUI evacuate a smaller urine volume have a lower peak flow (in flowmetry) and a lower bladder capacity (in cystomanometry) than patients with SUI. The rehabilitation treatment proposed in daily clinical practice (PFMT/BFB with or without TTNM improves SUI and UUI). In this study, the UDS has shown a greater clinical-urodynamic correlation in UUI than in SUI.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical and urodynamic outcomes of pubovaginal sling procedure with autologous rectus fascia for stress urinary incontinence
    Mitsui, Takahiko
    Tanaka, Hiroshi
    Moriya, Kimihiko
    Kakizaki, Hidehiro
    Nonomura, Katsuya
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 14 (12) : 1076 - 1079
  • [32] Can we predict urinary stress incontinence by using demographic, clinical, imaging and urodynamic data?
    Wlazlak, Edyta
    Surkont, Grzegorz
    Shek, Ka L.
    Dietz, Hans P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2015, 193 : 114 - 117
  • [33] Effects of Different Treatment Methods on the Clinical and Urodynamic State of Perimenopausal Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence
    Liu, Lifen
    Zhang, Ying
    Gong, Jingya
    Chen, Xin
    Wu, Hongmei
    Zhu, Weipei
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 47 (08) : 1090 - 1097
  • [34] Outcomes of urodynamic mixed urinary incontinence (MUI-UD) and urodynamic stress incontinence with urgency (MUI) after mid-urethral sling surgery
    Lo, T. S.
    Ibrahim, R.
    Ng, K. L.
    Hsieh, W.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 31 (SUPPL 1) : S45 - S45
  • [35] Lower urinary tract dysfunction in Machado-Joseph disease: a study of 11 clinical-urodynamic observations
    Sakakibara, R
    Uchiyama, T
    Arai, K
    Yamanishi, T
    Hattori, T
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2004, 218 (1-2) : 67 - 72
  • [36] Clinical Management of Urinary Incontinence in Women
    Hersh, Lauren
    Salzman, Brooke
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2013, 87 (09) : 634 - 640
  • [37] Female stress urinary incontinence clinical guidelines panel summary report on surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence
    Leach, GE
    Dmochowski, RR
    Appell, RA
    Blaivas, JG
    Hadley, HR
    Luber, KM
    Mostwin, JL
    ODonnell, PD
    Roehrborn, CG
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 158 (03): : 875 - 880
  • [38] CLINICAL AND URODYNAMIC EFFECTS OF NORFENEFRINE IN WOMEN WITH STRESS-INCONTINENCE
    LOSE, G
    LINDHOLM, P
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 1984, 39 (05) : 298 - 302
  • [39] Clinical, urodynamic, and manometric findings in women with combined fecal and urinary incontinence
    Lacima, G
    Espuña, M
    Pera, M
    Puig-Clota, M
    Quintó, L
    García-Valdecasas, JC
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2002, 21 (05) : 464 - 469
  • [40] Development and validity of a questionnaire for coital urinary incontinence: clinical and urodynamic analysis
    Tarhan, Fatih
    Ay, Pinar
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 30 (12) : 2141 - 2148