Determining H0 using a model-independent method

被引:0
|
作者
Pu-Xun Wu
Zheng-Xiang Li
Hong-Wei Yu
机构
[1] Ningbo University,Center for Nonlinear Science and Department of Physics
[2] Peking University,Center for High Energy Physics
[3] Beijing Normal University,Department of Astronomy
来源
Frontiers of Physics | 2017年 / 12卷
关键词
Hubble constant; luminosity distance; angular diameter distance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
By using type Ia supernovae (SNIa) to provide the luminosity distance (LD) directly, which depends on the value of the Hubble constant H0 = 100h km ∙ s-1 ∙ Mpc-1, and the angular diameter distance from galaxy clusters or baryon acoustic oscillations (BAOs) to give the derived LD according to the distance duality relation, we propose a model-independent method to determine h from the fact that different observations should give the same LD at a given redshift. Combining the Sloan Digital Sky Survey II (SDSS-II) SNIa from the MLCS2k2 light curve fit and galaxy cluster data, we find that at the 1σ confidence level (CL), h = 0:5867 ± 0:0303 for the sample of the elliptical β model for galaxy clusters, and h = 0:6199 ± 0:0293 for that of the spherical β model. The former is smaller than the values from other observations, whereas the latter is consistent with the Planck result at the 2σ CL and agrees very well with the value reconstructed directly from the H(z) data. With the SDSS-II SNIa and BAO measurements, a tighter constraint, h = 0:6683 ± 0:0221, is obtained. For comparison, we also consider the Union 2.1 SNIa from the SALT2 light curve fitting. The results from the Union 2.1 SNIa are slightly larger than those from the SDSS-II SNIa, and the Union 2.1 SNIa + BAOs give the tightest value. We find that the values from SNIa + BAOs are quite consistent with those from the Planck and the BAOs, as well as the local measurement from Cepheids and very-low-redshift SNIa.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Model-independent method for fMRI analysis
    Soltanian-Zadeh, H
    Peck, DJ
    Hearshen, DO
    Lajiness-O'Neill, RR
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2004, 23 (03) : 285 - 296
  • [22] h0,h映射与(h0,h)-稳定性
    傅希林
    王琳
    科学技术与工程, 2005, (05) : 262 - 263
  • [23] H0 ex machina: Vacuum metamorphosis and beyond H0
    Di Valentino, Eleonora
    Linder, Eric V.
    Melchiorri, Alessandro
    PHYSICS OF THE DARK UNIVERSE, 2020, 30
  • [24] NIST method for determining model-independent structural information by X-ray reflectometry
    Windover, D.
    Gil, D. L.
    Cline, J. P.
    Henins, A.
    Armstrong, N.
    Hung, P. Y.
    Song, S. C.
    Jammy, R.
    Diebold, A.
    FRONTIERS OF CHARACTERIZATION AND METROLOGY FOR NANOELECTRONICS: 2007, 2007, 931 : 287 - +
  • [25] Model-independent method for measuring the angular coefficients of B0→ D∗−τ+ντ decays
    Donal Hill
    Malcolm John
    Wenqi Ke
    Anton Poluektov
    Journal of High Energy Physics, 2019
  • [26] H0 revisited
    Efstathiou, George
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 440 (02) : 1138 - 1152
  • [27] Using Neutrino Oscillations to Measure H0?
    Anchordoqui, Luis A.
    UNIVERSE, 2022, 8 (07)
  • [28] Using neutrino oscillations to measure H0
    Khalifeh, Ali Rida
    Jimenez, Raul
    PHYSICS OF THE DARK UNIVERSE, 2022, 37
  • [29] Determining H0 with XMM-Newton and the Cosmic Background Imager
    Udomprasert, PS
    Mason, BS
    Readhead, ACS
    NEW CENTURY OF X-RAY ASTRONOMY, 2001, 251 : 492 - 493
  • [30] The trouble with H0
    Bernal, Jose Luis
    Verde, Licia
    Riess, Adam G.
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2016, (10):