Determining H0 using a model-independent method

被引:0
|
作者
Pu-Xun Wu
Zheng-Xiang Li
Hong-Wei Yu
机构
[1] Ningbo University,Center for Nonlinear Science and Department of Physics
[2] Peking University,Center for High Energy Physics
[3] Beijing Normal University,Department of Astronomy
来源
Frontiers of Physics | 2017年 / 12卷
关键词
Hubble constant; luminosity distance; angular diameter distance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
By using type Ia supernovae (SNIa) to provide the luminosity distance (LD) directly, which depends on the value of the Hubble constant H0 = 100h km ∙ s-1 ∙ Mpc-1, and the angular diameter distance from galaxy clusters or baryon acoustic oscillations (BAOs) to give the derived LD according to the distance duality relation, we propose a model-independent method to determine h from the fact that different observations should give the same LD at a given redshift. Combining the Sloan Digital Sky Survey II (SDSS-II) SNIa from the MLCS2k2 light curve fit and galaxy cluster data, we find that at the 1σ confidence level (CL), h = 0:5867 ± 0:0303 for the sample of the elliptical β model for galaxy clusters, and h = 0:6199 ± 0:0293 for that of the spherical β model. The former is smaller than the values from other observations, whereas the latter is consistent with the Planck result at the 2σ CL and agrees very well with the value reconstructed directly from the H(z) data. With the SDSS-II SNIa and BAO measurements, a tighter constraint, h = 0:6683 ± 0:0221, is obtained. For comparison, we also consider the Union 2.1 SNIa from the SALT2 light curve fitting. The results from the Union 2.1 SNIa are slightly larger than those from the SDSS-II SNIa, and the Union 2.1 SNIa + BAOs give the tightest value. We find that the values from SNIa + BAOs are quite consistent with those from the Planck and the BAOs, as well as the local measurement from Cepheids and very-low-redshift SNIa.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Determining H0 using a model-independent method
    Wu, Pu-Xun
    Li, Zheng-Xiang
    Yu, Hong-Wei
    FRONTIERS OF PHYSICS, 2017, 12 (01)
  • [2] Determining Model-independent H0 and Consistency Tests
    Liao, Kai
    Shafieloo, Arman
    Keeley, Ryan E.
    Linder, Eric, V
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS, 2020, 895 (02)
  • [3] Model-independent determination on H0 using the latest cosmic chronometer data
    Wang, Deng
    Meng, XinHe
    SCIENCE CHINA-PHYSICS MECHANICS & ASTRONOMY, 2017, 60 (11)
  • [4] Model-independent determination on H0 using the latest cosmic chronometer data
    Deng Wang
    Xin He Meng
    Science China(Physics,Mechanics & Astronomy), 2017, (11) : 6 - 15
  • [5] Model-independent determination on H0 using the latest cosmic chronometer data
    Deng Wang
    XinHe Meng
    Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 2017, 60
  • [6] Model-Independent Determination of H0 and ΩK0 from Strong Lensing and Type Ia Supernovae
    Collett, Thomas
    Montanari, Francesco
    Rasanen, Syksy
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2019, 123 (23)
  • [7] Model-independent Estimation of H0 and ΩK from Strongly Lensed Fast Radio Bursts
    Zhao, Shaoxin
    Liu, Bin
    Li, Zhengxiang
    Gao, He
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 916 (02):
  • [8] Measurements of H0 and reconstruction of the dark energy properties from a model-independent joint analysis
    Bonilla, Alexander
    Kumar, Suresh
    Nunes, Rafael C.
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C, 2021, 81 (02):
  • [9] Model-independent determination of H0 and ΩK, 0 using time-delay galaxy lenses and gamma-ray bursts
    Du, Shen-Shi
    Wei, Jun-Jie
    You, Zhi-Qiang
    Chen, Zu-Cheng
    Zhu, Zong-Hong
    Liang, En-Wei
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2023, 521 (04) : 4963 - 4975
  • [10] Determining Higgs couplings with a model-independent analysis of h → γγ
    Azatov, Aleksandr
    Contino, Roberto
    Del Re, Daniele
    Galloway, Jamison
    Grassi, Marco
    Rahatlou, Shahram
    JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS, 2012, (06):