Thermoeconomic Optimization of a 450 MW Natural Gas Burning Steam Power Plant

被引:0
|
作者
Lucky Anetor
Edward E. Osakue
Christopher Odetunde
机构
[1] Nigerian Defence Academy,Department of Mechanical Engineering
[2] Texas Southern University,Department of Industrial Technology
[3] Kwara State University,Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Engineering
关键词
Thermoeconomic; Local optimization; Exergy; Sequential Quadratic Programming;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The theory of thermoeconomics and local optimization were used to investigate how the cost of the resources consumed by a 450 MW power plant varies with the unit cost of the resources consumed, the technical production coefficients of the productive structure and/or the external demand for the products. In order to accomplish this, the costs of exergy of the productive structure were analyzed under three different conditions by using the relevant characteristic equations. In general, it was found that the thermoeconomic cost of a flow consists of two parts, namely the monetary cost of the fuel exergy (natural gas in the present study) needed to produce the flow, that is, its thermoeconomic cost and the costs due to the productive process (cost of capital equipment, maintenance, etc.). The results show that the steam leaving the boiler has the lowest exergy cost, while the condenser has the highest. The sequential quadratic programming (SQP) algorithm was used to obtain the optimized solutions of each major component of the plant. It was found that substantial operational and capital cost benefits were realized by optimizing most of the major plant equipment (boiler, turbines, feedwater heaters and the pumps). However, optimization of the condenser did not yield any cost benefit in capital equipment cost, but did produce some savings in operational cost.
引用
收藏
页码:4643 / 4659
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Solar steam reforming of natural gas integrated with a gas turbine power plant: Economic assessment
    Bianchini, Augusto
    Pellegrini, Marco
    Saccani, Cesare
    [J]. SOLAR ENERGY, 2015, 122 : 1342 - 1353
  • [22] Thermoeconomic Methodology for Analysis and Optimization of a Hybrid Solar Thermal Power Plant
    Baghernejad, A.
    Yaghoubi, M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREEN ENERGY, 2013, 10 (06) : 588 - 609
  • [23] Thermoeconomic analysis and multiobjective optimization of a combined gas turbine, steam, and organic Rankine cycle
    Mohammadi, Amin
    Ashouri, Milad
    Ahmadi, Mohammad Hossein
    Bidi, Mokhtar
    Sadeghzadeh, Milad
    Ming, Tingzhen
    [J]. ENERGY SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2018, 6 (05): : 506 - 522
  • [24] Thermoeconomic optimization of a combined-cycle solar tower power plant
    Spelling, James
    Favrat, Daniel
    Martin, Andrew
    Augsburger, Germain
    [J]. ENERGY, 2012, 41 (01) : 113 - 120
  • [25] Energy and Exergy Analysis of a 348.5 MW Steam Power Plant
    Mitrovic, D.
    Zivkovic, D.
    Lakovic, M. S.
    [J]. ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2010, 32 (11) : 1016 - 1027
  • [26] Feedwater repowering of 800 MW supercritical steam power plant
    Wolowicz, Marcin
    Milewski, Jaroslaw
    Badyda, Krzysztof
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POWER TECHNOLOGIES, 2012, 92 (02): : 127 - 134
  • [27] Multi-objective optimization for advanced superheater steam temperature control in a 300 MW power plant
    Sun, Li
    Hua, Qingsong
    Shen, Jiong
    Xue, Yali
    Li, Donghai
    Lee, Kwang Y.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 208 : 592 - 606
  • [28] Exergoeconomic Based Optimization of a Gas Fired Steam Power Plant Using Genetic Algorithm
    Javan, Saeed
    Ahmadi, Pouria
    Mansoubi, Hadi
    Jaafar, Mohammad Nazri Mohd
    [J]. HEAT TRANSFER-ASIAN RESEARCH, 2015, 44 (06): : 533 - 551
  • [29] 205-MW GAS AND STEAM POWER-PLANT THROMBAY - GERMAN-INDIAN COOPERATION
    NAUEN, A
    [J]. BRENNSTOFF-WARME-KRAFT, 1995, 47 (7-8): : 289 - &
  • [30] The thermodynamic and economic optimization of a gas-steam power plant by means of genetic algorithms
    Kotowicz, Janusz
    Bartela, Lukasz
    [J]. RYNEK ENERGII, 2008, (02): : 31 - 38