Efficacy of Code Provisions for Seismic Design of Asymmetric RC Building

被引:0
|
作者
Balakrishnan B. [1 ]
Sarkar P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai
[2] Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, 769 008, Orissa
关键词
Asymmetric building; Non-linear dynamic analysis; Plastic hinge; Pushover analysis; Reinforced concrete; Torsion;
D O I
10.1007/s40030-016-0156-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The earthquake resistant design code in India, IS: 1893, has been revised in 2002 to include provisions for torsional irregularity in asymmetric buildings. In line with other international code, IS 1893: 2002 requires estimating the design eccentricity from static and accidental eccentricity. The present study attempts to evaluate the effectiveness of the design code requirements for designing torsionally irregular asymmetric buildings. Two similar asymmetric buildings designed considering and ignoring code requirement has been considered for this study. Nonlinear static and dynamic analyses are performed on these buildings to realize the difference in their behaviour and it is found that the plan asymmetry in the building makes it non-ductile even after design with code provisions. Code criterion for plan asymmetry tends to improve the strength of members but this study indicates that changing the stiffness distribution to reduce eccentricity may lead to a preferred mode of failure. © 2016, The Institution of Engineers (India).
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 120
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Evolution of Seismic Design Provisions in Indonesia's National Bridge Code
    Simanjuntak, Veby Citra
    Imran, Iswandi
    Moestopo, Muslinang
    Setio, Herlien D.
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 54 (06): : 1285 - 1304
  • [32] Egyptian Code Seismic Load Design Provisions for Moment Resisting Frames
    Hanafy, Ahmed Hossameldin
    Darwish, Mohammed
    Baraka, Moustafa
    FACING THE CHALLENGES IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2018, : 94 - 103
  • [33] Seismic assessment of existing RC shear walls non-compliant with current code provisions
    Christidis, Konstantinos
    Vougioukas, Emmanouil
    Trezos, Konstantinos G.
    MAGAZINE OF CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2013, 65 (17) : 1059 - 1072
  • [34] A CRITIQUE OF THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR SEISMIC DESIGN OF THE BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR REINFORCED-CONCRETE (ACI 318-83)
    PAULAY, T
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE, 1986, 83 (02): : 274 - 283
  • [35] Reliability of steel frames designed in accordance with the National Building Code of Canada seismic provisions and its implication in codified design
    Hong, H. P.
    Hong, P.
    Wang, W.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2010, 32 (05) : 1284 - 1291
  • [36] Code Requirements for the Seismic Design of Irregular Elevation RC Structures
    Santos, Davi
    Melo, Jose
    Varum, Humberto
    BUILDINGS, 2024, 14 (05)
  • [37] NEW ROMANIAN SEISMIC DESIGN CODE REASSESSMENT A RC BRIDGE
    Bucur, Carmen
    ECOLOGY, ECONOMICS, EDUCATION AND LEGISLATION CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, SGEM 2016, VOL III, 2016, : 397 - 404
  • [38] Discussion of "Overview of seismic provisions of the proposed 2005 edition of the National Building Code of Canada"
    Watts, RD
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2003, 30 (06) : 1157 - 1157
  • [39] Effect of Seismic Design Provisions of Indian Standards on Seismic Response of URM Infilled RC Buildings on Hill
    Naorem, Z.
    Haldar, P.
    JOURNAL OF VIBRATION ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 12 (05) : 7107 - 7120
  • [40] Enhancing Building Resistance to Differential Settlement with Canadian Seismic Design Provisions
    Desbrousses, Romaric Leo Esteban
    Lin, Lan
    PRACTICE PERIODICAL ON STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 26 (02)