Deep Brain Stimulation for Addictive Disorders—Where Are We Now?

被引:0
|
作者
Jason Yuen
Abbas Z. Kouzani
Michael Berk
Susannah J. Tye
Aaron E. Rusheen
Charles D. Blaha
Kevin E. Bennet
Kendall H. Lee
Hojin Shin
Jee Hyun Kim
Yoonbae Oh
机构
[1] Mayo Clinic,Department of Neurologic Surgery
[2] Deakin University,School of Engineering
[3] IMPACT,Queensland Brain Institute
[4] The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation,Department of Psychiatry & Psychology
[5] School of Medicine,Department of Psychiatry
[6] Deakin University,Department of Psychiatry
[7] The University of Queensland,Division of Engineering
[8] Mayo Clinic,Department of Biomedical Engineering
[9] University of Minnesota,undefined
[10] Emory University,undefined
[11] Mayo Clinic,undefined
[12] Mayo Clinic,undefined
来源
Neurotherapeutics | 2022年 / 19卷
关键词
Deep brain stimulation; Addiction; Biomarkers; Animal models; Neuromodulation; Neuropsychiatry;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the face of a global epidemic of drug addiction, neglecting to develop new effective therapies will perpetuate the staggering human and economic costs of substance use. This review aims to summarize and evaluate the preclinical and clinical studies of deep brain stimulation (DBS) as a novel therapy for refractory addiction, in hopes to engage and inform future research in this promising novel treatment avenue. An electronic database search (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library) was performed using keywords and predefined inclusion criteria between 1974 and 6/18/2021 (registered on Open Science Registry). Selected articles were reviewed in full text and key details were summarized and analyzed to understand DBS’ therapeutic potential and possible mechanisms of action. The search yielded 25 animal and 22 human studies. Animal studies showed that DBS of targets such as nucleus accumbens (NAc), insula, and subthalamic nucleus reduces drug use and seeking. All human studies were case series/reports (level 4/5 evidence), mostly targeting the NAc with generally positive outcomes. From the limited evidence in the literature, DBS, particularly of the NAc, appears to be a reasonable last resort option for refractory addictive disorders. We propose that future research in objective electrophysiological (e.g., local field potentials) and neurochemical (e.g., extracellular dopamine levels) biomarkers would assist monitoring the progress of treatment and developing a closed-loop DBS system. Preclinical literature also highlighted the prefrontal cortex as a promising DBS target, which should be explored in human research.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1193 / 1215
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Neuromodulation of Vegetative State through Spinal Cord Stimulation: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Going?
    Della Pepa, Giuseppe Maria
    Fukaya, Chikashi
    La Rocca, Giuseppe
    Zhong, Jun
    Visocchi, Massimiliano
    STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 91 (05) : 275 - 287
  • [32] Addictive behaviors: where do we stand, and where are we going?
    Thibaut, Florence
    Hoehe, Margret
    DIALOGUES IN CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 19 (03) : 215 - 215
  • [33] Where We Are Now
    Dever, Maryanne
    Adkins, Lisa
    AUSTRALIAN FEMINIST STUDIES, 2017, 32 (93) : 217 - 218
  • [35] 'Where we are now'
    Donaldson, J
    FIDDLEHEAD, 2002, (212): : 62 - 64
  • [36] WHERE WE ARE NOW
    NIBLETT, WR
    STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 1983, 8 (02) : 105 - 110
  • [37] WHERE ARE WE NOW
    JULIAN, DG
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1982, 14 : S57 - &
  • [38] Where are we now?
    Farham, Bridget
    SAMJ SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 106 (04): : 4 - 4
  • [39] WHERE ARE WE NOW
    NAKAJIMA, S
    SCIENCE OF SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND NEW MATERIALS, 1989, 18 : 3 - 7
  • [40] Where are we now?
    Hanchard, NA
    WEST INDIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 47 (04): : 123 - 124