Recreation and its synergies and trade-offs with other ecosystem services of Alpine and pre-Alpine grasslands

被引:1
|
作者
Schmitt, Thomas M. [1 ,2 ]
Haensel, Maria [1 ]
Kaim, Andrea [1 ,3 ]
Lee, Heera [2 ,4 ]
Reinermann, Sophie [5 ]
Koellner, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bayreuth, Bayreuth Ctr Ecol & Environm Res Bay CEER, Professorship Ecol Serv, Univ Str 30, D-95447 Bayreuth, Germany
[2] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Inst Meteorol & Climate Res Atmospher Environm Res, Kreuzeckbahnstr 19, D-82467 Garmisch Partenkirchen, Germany
[3] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Computat Landscape Ecol, Permosertrasse 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[4] Konkuk Univ, Coll Sang Huh Life Sci, Dept Forestry & Landscape Architecture, 120 Neungdong Ro, Seoul 05029, South Korea
[5] Univ Wurzburg, Inst Geog & Geol, Dept Remote Sensing, D-97074 Wurzburg, Germany
关键词
Cultural ecosystem services; Geo-tagged photos; Grasslands; Mountains; Synergies and trade-offs; CULTURAL SERVICES; AESTHETIC VALUE; CLIMATE;
D O I
10.1007/s10113-024-02213-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Alpine and pre-Alpine grasslands provide numerous ecosystem services including provisioning services (e.g. fodder production), regulating services (e.g. soil erosion reduction), and cultural services (e.g. recreation). While intensively managed grasslands specifically target the production of fodder, more extensively used grasslands are known for being hotspots of biodiversity. However, there is a need to better understand the relationship among the supply of ecosystem services, specifically regarding the use of grasslands for cultural ecosystem services such as recreation. In this study, we investigated the synergies and trade-offs of ecosystem services and analyzed underlying variables related to the recreational use of grasslands. We investigated the supply of recreation (indicated by Photo-User-Days from geo-tagged photos on grasslands), fodder production (indicated by yield), and regulating and habitat ecosystem services (indicated by agri-environmental payments), and analyzed their relationship to management-related variables with a Redundancy Analysis. To better explain the recreational use of grasslands, we further analyzed how environmental and infrastructural features influence the occurrence of Photo-User-Days with a hurdle regression. Finally, we conducted spatial analyses to understand the distribution of Photo-User-Days in space. We found a weak but significant negative relationship between Photo-User-Days and yield, which implies that people slightly prefer extensive grassland to intensive grassland for recreation. Our results also show that agri-environmental schemes targeted towards extensive grassland management can positively influence the recreational use. Other factors, such as proximity to touristic features (e.g. castles), presence of infrastructural features (e.g. cable cars), and environmental characteristics (e.g. low share of croplands, distance to forests), also influenced the spatial distribution of photos on grasslands. The importance of these factors underscores the value of grasslands as a component of the cultural landscape for recreational purposes. These results also suggest that cultural ecosystem services of grasslands can be considered to be co-produced by natural, social, and infrastructural components. The study further discusses limitations to the explanatory power of geo-tagged photo analysis to determine the wide range of cultural ecosystem services of grasslands. We conclude that grasslands play an important role for recreation in (pre-)Alpine landscapes, which can also be effectively supported through targeted agri-environmental payments.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Vegetation traits of pre-Alpine grasslands in southern Germany
    Anne Schucknecht
    Alexander Krämer
    Sarah Asam
    Abraham Mejia-Aguilar
    Noelia Garcia-Franco
    Max A. Schuchardt
    Anke Jentsch
    Ralf Kiese
    Scientific Data, 7
  • [22] Land management influences trade-offs and the total supply of ecosystem services in alpine grassland in Tibet, China
    Wu, Junxi
    Zhao, Yan
    Yu, Chengqun
    Luo, Liming
    Pan, Ying
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 193 : 70 - 78
  • [23] Global synergies and trade-offs between multiple dimensions of biodiversity and ecosystem services
    Marco Girardello
    Andrea Santangeli
    Emiliano Mori
    Anna Chapman
    Simone Fattorini
    Robin Naidoo
    Sandro Bertolino
    Jens-Christian Svenning
    Scientific Reports, 9
  • [24] Assessing Trade-Offs and Synergies in Ecosystem Services within the Tianshan Mountainous Region
    Li, Hui
    Cui, Shichao
    Zhao, Chengyi
    Zhang, Haidong
    WATER, 2024, 16 (20)
  • [25] Spatial Trade-Offs and Synergies between Ecosystem Services in Guangdong Province, China
    Xu, Qian
    Yang, Ying
    Yang, Ren
    Zha, Li-Si
    Lin, Zi-Qing
    Shang, Shu-Hao
    LAND, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [26] Trade-Offs and Synergies between Ecosystem Services Provided by Different Rural Landscape
    Bartolini, Fabio
    Vergamini, Daniele
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2023, 13 (04):
  • [27] Cultural ecosystem services in an urban park: understanding bundles, trade-offs, and synergies
    Xin Cheng
    Sylvie Van Damme
    Luyuan Li
    Pieter Uyttenhove
    Landscape Ecology, 2022, 37 : 1693 - 1705
  • [28] Global synergies and trade-offs between multiple dimensions of biodiversity and ecosystem services
    Girardello, Marco
    Santangeli, Andrea
    Mori, Emiliano
    Chapman, Anna
    Fattorini, Simone
    Naidoo, Robin
    Bertolino, Sandro
    Svenning, Jens-Christian
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [29] Cultural Ecosystem Services in Protected Areas: Understanding Bundles, Trade-Offs, and Synergies
    Ament, Judith M.
    Moore, Christine A.
    Herbst, Marna
    Cumming, Graeme S.
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2017, 10 (04): : 440 - 450
  • [30] Spatial dynamics of biophysical trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services in the Himalayas
    Aryal, Kishor
    Maraseni, Tek
    Apan, Armando
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2023, 59