Predictors of outcome of non-displaced fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal

被引:0
|
作者
Peter Vorlat
Wim Achtergael
Patrick Haentjens
机构
[1] University Hospital of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel,Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
[2] Academisch Ziekenhuis - V.U.B.,Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
来源
关键词
Fracture Type; Avulsion Fracture; Cosmetic Problem; Early Weight Bearing; Comfort Score;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to identify those factors that influence the outcome after conservative treatment of undisplaced fractures of the fifth metatarsal. This was done with univariate analyses and, for the first time, with regression analyses of day-to-day clinical practice. Thirty-eight patients were treated with plaster and periods of no weight bearing (NWB). Their mean age was 48 years. They were evaluated using the Olerud ankle score, with analogue scales for pain and comfort, and with questions about cosmesis and wearing of shoes. Six patients sustained a Jones fracture and 32 a tuberosity avulsion fracture. The mean period of NWB was 17 days and of casting was 38 days. Three Jones fractures and all the avulsion fractures were healed at the end of treatment. After a mean of 490 days, the global ankle score was 82/100. Ten patients reported problems with shoes and nine reported cosmetic problems. The linear analogue scale for pain was 2.11/10 and for comfort 8.42/10. Gender, age, and fracture type did not affect outcome. The most significant predictor of poor functional outcome was longer NWB, which was strongly associated with worse global outcome, discomfort, and reported stiffness. NWB should be kept to a minimum for acute avulsions of the tuberosity of the fifth metatarsal.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 10
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Healing of non-displaced fractures produced by fatigue loading of the mouse ulna
    Martinez, Mario D.
    Schmid, Gregory J.
    McKenzie, Jennifer A.
    Ornitz, David M.
    Silva, Matthew J.
    BONE, 2010, 46 (06) : 1604 - 1612
  • [32] Nonunion of Fifth Metatarsal Fractures
    Solan, Matthew
    Davies, Mark
    FOOT AND ANKLE CLINICS, 2014, 19 (03) : 499 - +
  • [33] INDEPENDENT EXERCISES VERSUS PHYSIOTHERAPY IN NON-DISPLACED PROXIMAL HUMERAL FRACTURES
    LUNDBERG, BJ
    SVENUNGSONHARTWIG, E
    WIKMARK, R
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 1979, 11 (03): : 133 - 136
  • [34] What is the most effective management of acute fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal?
    Vu, Davis
    McDiarmid, Todd
    Brown, Marcy
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 2006, 55 (08): : 713 - +
  • [35] Proximal Fifth Metatarsal Fractures
    Ramponi, Denise R.
    ADVANCED EMERGENCY NURSING JOURNAL, 2013, 35 (04) : 287 - 292
  • [36] Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal
    Strayer, SM
    Reece, SG
    Petrizzi, MJ
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 1999, 59 (09) : 2516 - 2522
  • [37] Fifth Metatarsal Fractures and Refractures
    Hunt, Kenneth J.
    Anderson, Robert B.
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2014, 22 (04) : 305 - 312
  • [38] A simple technique for performing percutaneous fixation of fifth metatarsal base fractures
    Roukis, Thomas S.
    Graner, Dave
    Zgonis, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PODIATRIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2007, 97 (03) : 244 - 245
  • [39] Clinical comparison of CRT and LCD monitors in the evaluation of non-displaced fractures
    Reiner, B.
    Siegel, E.
    Brower, S.
    Moffitt, R.
    Journal of Digital Imaging, 2003, 16 (SUPPL.) : 76 - 77
  • [40] Predictors of early failure of the cannulated screw system in patients, 65 years and older, with non-displaced femoral neck fractures
    Biz, Carlo
    Tagliapietra, Jacopo
    Zonta, Filippo
    Belluzzi, Elisa
    Bragazzi, Nicola Luigi
    Ruggieri, Pietro
    AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2020, 32 (03) : 505 - 513