Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation: A Communicative Framework

被引:0
|
作者
Guido Palazzo
Andreas Georg Scherer
机构
[1] University of Lausanne,Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales (HEC)
[2] University of Zurich,undefined
来源
关键词
Business and society; business ethics; corporate social responsibility; deliberative democracy; globalization; organizational legitimacy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Modern society is challenged by a loss of efficiency in national governance systems values, and lifestyles. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) discourse builds upon a conception of organizational legitimacy that does not appropriately reflect these changes. The problems arise from the a-political role of the corporation in the concepts of cognitive and pragmatic legitimacy, which are based on compliance to national law and on relatively homogeneous and stable societal expectations on the one hand and widely accepted rhetoric assuming that all members of society benefit from capitalist production on the other. We therefore propose a fundamental shift to moral legitimacy, from an output and power oriented approach to an input related and discursive concept of legitimacy. This shift creates a new basis of legitimacy and involves organizations in processes of active justification vis-à-vis society rather than simply responding to the demands of powerful groups. We consider this a step towards the politicization of the corporation and attempt to re-embed the debate on corporate legitimacy into its broader context of political theory, while reflecting the recent turn from a liberal to a deliberative concept of democracy.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 88
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Tracing the sources of legitimacy: the impact of deliberation in participatory natural resource management
    Simon Birnbaum
    Örjan Bodin
    Annica Sandström
    Policy Sciences, 2015, 48 : 443 - 461
  • [42] Authority and legitimacy in global governance: Deliberation, institutional differentiation, and the codex alimentarius
    Livermore, Michael A.
    NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 2006, 81 (02) : 766 - 801
  • [43] Agent deliberation in an executable temporal framework
    Fisher, Michael
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED LOGIC, 2011, 9 (04) : 223 - 238
  • [44] Deliberation, Accountability, and Legitimacy: A Case Study of Police-Community Forums
    Wahl, Rachel
    White, Stephen K.
    POLITY, 2017, 49 (04) : 489 - 517
  • [45] Crowd-Sourced Legislation and Politics: The Legitimacy of Constitutional Deliberation in Romania
    Gherghina, Sergiu
    Miscoiu, Sergiu
    PROBLEMS OF POST-COMMUNISM, 2016, 63 (01) : 27 - 36
  • [46] A Formal Argumentation Framework for Deliberation Dialogues
    Kok, Eric M.
    Meyer, John-Jules Ch.
    Prakken, Henry
    Vreeswijk, Gerard A. W.
    ARGUMENTATION IN MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS (ARGMAS), 2011, 6614 : 31 - 48
  • [47] An Integrational Framework of Organizational Moral Development, Legitimacy, and Corporate Responsibility: A Longitudinal, Intersectoral Analysis of Citizenship Reports
    Lewis, Gabriella
    Palacios, Sergio
    Valenzuela, Marcus A.
    BUSINESS AND SOCIETY REVIEW, 2016, 121 (04) : 593 - 623
  • [48] Alerting corporate leaders: the need for ethical deliberation and sustainability
    Sharma, Umesh
    Kelly, Martin
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AUDITING AND FINANCE, 2016, 5 (03) : 181 - 192
  • [49] CORPORATE FRAME FAILURE AND THE EROSION OF ELITE LEGITIMACY
    Messer, Chris M.
    Adams, Alison E.
    Shriver, Thomas E.
    SOCIOLOGICAL QUARTERLY, 2012, 53 (03): : 475 - 499
  • [50] Network legitimacy diffusion: a model for corporate entrepreneurship
    Jeffrey S. Hornsby
    James M. Bloodgood
    James Hayton
    Donald F. Kuratko
    International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2013, 9 : 307 - 322