Recurrent Governance Challenges in the Implementation and Alignment of Flood Risk Management Strategies: a Review

被引:0
|
作者
C. Dieperink
D. L. T Hegger
M. H. N. Bakker
Z. W. Kundzewicz
C. Green
P. P. J. Driessen
机构
[1] Utrecht University,Polish Academy of Sciences
[2] Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development,undefined
[3] Institute of Agricultural and Forest Environment,undefined
[4] Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research,undefined
[5] Middlesex University,undefined
[6] Flood Hazard Research Centre,undefined
来源
关键词
Flood risk governance; Flood risk management; Coordination mechanisms; Participation; Collaboration; Europe; Literature review;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In Europe increasing flood risks challenge societies to diversify their Flood Risk Management Strategies (FRMSs). Such a diversification implies that actors not only focus on flood defence, but also and simultaneously on flood risk prevention, mitigation, preparation and recovery. There is much literature on the implementation of specific strategies and measures as well as on flood risk governance more generally. What is lacking, though, is a clear overview of the complex set of governance challenges which may result from a diversification and alignment of FRM strategies. This paper aims to address this knowledge gap. It elaborates on potential processes and mechanisms for coordinating the activities and capacities of actors that are involved on different levels and in different sectors of flood risk governance, both concerning the implementation of individual strategies and the coordination of the overall set of strategies. It identifies eight overall coordination mechanisms that have proven to be useful in this respect.
引用
收藏
页码:4467 / 4481
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The flood management policy in Bandung city: Challenges and potential strategies
    Setiadi, Setiadi
    Sumaryana, Asep
    Bekti, Herijanto
    Sukarno, Dedi
    [J]. COGENT SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2023, 9 (02):
  • [22] Governance in support of integrated flood risk management? The case of Romania
    Vinke-de Kruijf, Joanne
    Kuks, Stefan M. M.
    Augustijn, Denie C. M.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 16 : 104 - 118
  • [23] A Review of Flood Management Governance Framework in Malaysia and Selected Countries
    Latif, Aliza Abdul
    Arshad, Noor Habibah
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2014 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MULTIMEDIA (ICIM), 2014, : 178 - 183
  • [24] Sustainability Aspects of Flood Risk Management: Interrelations and Challenges
    Nyberg, Lars
    Evers, Mariele
    Andersson-Skold, Yvonne
    Johansson, Magnus
    Blumenthal, Barbara
    [J]. SELECTED PAPERS FROM IDRC ON RISK REDUCTION AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT, 2010, 1 : 101 - 107
  • [25] Flood risk management in Italy: challenges and opportunities for the implementation of the EU Floods Directive (2007/60/EC)
    Mysiak, J.
    Testella, F.
    Bonaiuto, M.
    Carrus, G.
    De Dominicis, S.
    Cancellieri, U. Ganucci
    Firus, K.
    Grifoni, P.
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2013, 13 (11) : 2883 - 2890
  • [26] Approaches in research on flood risk perception and their importance in flood risk management: a review
    Ewa Lechowska
    [J]. Natural Hazards, 2022, 111 : 2343 - 2378
  • [27] Approaches in research on flood risk perception and their importance in flood risk management: a review
    Lechowska, Ewa
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2022, 111 (03) : 2343 - 2378
  • [28] Participatory Risk Governance for Seoul, South Korea's Flood Risk Management
    Ro, Bokjin
    Garfin, Gregg
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK SCIENCE, 2024, 15 (03) : 317 - 331
  • [29] Defining flood risk management strategies: A systems approach
    Thanh Mai
    Mushtaq, Shahbaz
    Reardon-Smith, Kate
    Webb, Paul
    Stone, Roger
    Kath, Jarrod
    Duc-Anh An-Vo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2020, 47
  • [30] Flood prevention in Serbia and legal challenges in obtaining the land for flood risk management
    Nikolic Popadic, Sofija
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2021, 116 : 213 - 219