Distance and similarity measures for normal wiggly dual hesitant fuzzy sets and their application in medical diagnosis

被引:0
|
作者
Jawad Ali
Muhammad Naeem
机构
[1] Kohat University of Science and Technology,Institute of Numerical Sciences
[2] Deanship of Joint First Year Umm Al-Qura University Makkah KSA,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The normal wiggly dual hesitant fuzzy set (NWDHFS) is a modern mathematical tool that can be used to express the deep ideas of membership and non-membership information hidden in the thought-level of decision-makers (DMs). To enhance and expand the applicability of NWDHFSs, this study originates several types of distance and similarity measures between two NWDHFSs. The present paper first revises the basic operational laws of normal wiggly dual hesitant fuzzy elements (NWDHFEs) and then generalizes the rule of length extension for normal wiggly dual hesitant fuzzy setting. Meanwhile, we introduce a variety of distance and similarity measures under the background of NWDHFSs. After that, a family of weighted distance and similarity measures based on NWDHFS is presented and analyzed for discrete and continuous cases. The stated measures are the extension of several existing measures and have the capability to handle uncertain and vague information with a wider range of information. DMs can select the most suitable alternative based on these measures by determining the gap between each alternative and the ideal one. Finally, a practical example concerning disease detection is addressed to demonstrate the applicability and merits of the developed theory and depict the differences between the presented distance and similarity measures.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Distance and Similarity Measures of Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Sets with Their Applications to Multiple Attribute Decision Making
    Wang, Lei
    Xu, Shiming
    Wang, Qiming
    Ni, Mingfang
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROGRESS IN INFORMATICS AND COMPUTING (PIC), 2014, : 88 - 92
  • [22] Some novel distance and similarity measures for probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy sets and their applications to MAGDM
    Ning, Baoquan
    Wei, Guiwu
    Guo, Yanfeng
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, 2022, 13 (12) : 3887 - 3907
  • [23] Distance measures for higher order dual hesitant fuzzy sets
    Jianjian Chen
    Xianjiu Huang
    Jing Tang
    [J]. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2018, 37 : 1784 - 1806
  • [24] Distance measures for higher order dual hesitant fuzzy sets
    Chen, Jianjian
    Huang, Xianjiu
    Tang, Jing
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL & APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2018, 37 (02): : 1784 - 1806
  • [25] Distance and similarity measures for hesitant interval-valued fuzzy sets
    Wei, Guiwu
    Lin, Rui
    Wang, Hongjun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2014, 27 (01) : 19 - 36
  • [26] Novel distance and similarity measures on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets with application to pattern recognition
    Zhang, Zhenyu
    Lin, Jie
    Miao, Runsheng
    Zhou, Lixin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2019, 37 (02) : 2981 - 2990
  • [27] A new version of distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and its application
    Tao, Zhifu
    Han, Bing
    Chen, Huayou
    Zhu, Jiaming
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2018, 34 (03) : 1801 - 1811
  • [28] Novel Distance and Similarity Measures on Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets and Their Application in Clustering Analysis
    Zhang, Zhenyu
    Li, Jin
    Sun, Youshuai
    Lin, Jie
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 100231 - 100242
  • [29] DISTANCE AND SIMILARITY MEASURES FOR DUAL HESITANT FUZZY SOFT SETS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS IN MULTICRITERIA DECISION MAKING PROBLEM
    Garg, Harish
    Arora, Rishu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2017, 7 (03) : 229 - 248
  • [30] Similarity and entropy measures for hesitant fuzzy sets
    Hu, Junhua
    Yang, Yan
    Zhang, Xiaolong
    Chen, Xiaohong
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS IN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 25 (03) : 857 - 886