On the Differentiation of Foveal and Peripheral Early Visual Evoked Potentials

被引:0
|
作者
Bruce C. Hansen
Andrew M. Haun
Aaron P. Johnson
Dave Ellemberg
机构
[1] Colgate University,Department of Psychology, Neuroscience Program
[2] University of Wisconsin-Madison,Department of Psychology
[3] Concordia University,Department of Psychology
[4] Université de Montréal,Centre de recherche en neuropsychologie et cognition (CERNEC)
来源
Brain Topography | 2016年 / 29卷
关键词
Visual evoked potentials (VEP); C1; Foveal vision; Peripheral vision; Spatial frequency;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The C1 is one of the earliest visual evoked potentials observed following the onset of a patterned stimulus. The polarity of its peak is dependent on whether stimuli are presented in the upper or lower regions of the peripheral visual field, but has been argued to be negative for stimuli presented to the fovea. However, there has yet to be a systematic investigation into the extent to which the peripheral C1 (pC1) and foveal C1 (fC1) can be differentiated on the basis of response characteristics to different stimuli. The current study employed checkerboard patterns (Exp 1) and sinusoidal gratings of different spatial frequency (Exp 2) presented to the fovea or within one of the four quadrants of the peripheral visual field. The checkerboard stimuli yielded a sizable difference in peak component latency, with the fC1 peaking ~32 ms after the pC1. Further, the pC1 showed a band-pass response magnitude profile that peaked at 4 cycles per degree (cpd), whereas the fC1 was high-pass for spatial frequency, with a cut-off around 4 cpd. Finally, the scalp topographies of the pC1 and fC1 in both experiments differed greatly, with the fC1 being more posterior than the pC1. The results reported here call into question recent attempts to characterize general C1 processes without regard to whether stimuli are placed in the fovea or in the periphery.
引用
收藏
页码:506 / 514
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EARLY AUDITORY EVOKED-POTENTIALS (EAEPS) AND VISUAL EVOKED-POTENTIALS (VEPS) AFTER DRUG APPLICATION
    KOMZAK, F
    CHALOUPKOVA, L
    KOLOMAZNIK, M
    BERGER, J
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1987, 67 (01): : P14 - P15
  • [32] FOLLOW-UP STUDIES OF VISUAL POTENTIALS IN MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS EVOKED BY CHECKERBOARD AND FOVEAL STIMULATION
    DIENER, HC
    SCHEIBLER, H
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1980, 49 (5-6): : 490 - 496
  • [33] PROPERTIES OF EVOKED VISUAL POTENTIALS
    TEPAS, DI
    ARMINGTON, JC
    VISION RESEARCH, 1962, 2 (05) : 449 - 461
  • [34] VISUAL EVOKED CORTICAL POTENTIALS
    COPENHAVER, RM
    PERRY, N
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1964, 3 (02): : 244 - 244
  • [35] Intraoperative Visual Evoked Potentials
    Anschel, David J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 35 (04) : 355 - 355
  • [36] Visual evoked potentials in neurobrucellosis
    Ergun, Ufuk
    Ertem, Guenay T.
    Kutlu, Guelnihal
    Coskun, Ozlem
    Inan, Levent E.
    Tulek, Necla
    Ilhan, Mustafa N.
    NEUROSCIENCES, 2008, 13 (04) : 363 - 365
  • [37] Visual Evoked Potentials and Glaucoma
    Tai, Tak Yee Tania
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 7 (05): : 352 - 355
  • [38] VISUAL-EVOKED POTENTIALS
    AMINOFF, MJ
    GOODIN, DS
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 11 (05) : 493 - 499
  • [39] Visual evoked potentials in pregnancy
    Yilmaz, H
    Erkin, EF
    Mavioglu, H
    Sungurtekin, Ü
    NEURO-OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1999, 21 (04) : 205 - 210
  • [40] Visual evoked potentials in the horse
    Stroem, L.
    Ekesten, B.
    BMC VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2016, 12