On the Differentiation of Foveal and Peripheral Early Visual Evoked Potentials

被引:0
|
作者
Bruce C. Hansen
Andrew M. Haun
Aaron P. Johnson
Dave Ellemberg
机构
[1] Colgate University,Department of Psychology, Neuroscience Program
[2] University of Wisconsin-Madison,Department of Psychology
[3] Concordia University,Department of Psychology
[4] Université de Montréal,Centre de recherche en neuropsychologie et cognition (CERNEC)
来源
Brain Topography | 2016年 / 29卷
关键词
Visual evoked potentials (VEP); C1; Foveal vision; Peripheral vision; Spatial frequency;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The C1 is one of the earliest visual evoked potentials observed following the onset of a patterned stimulus. The polarity of its peak is dependent on whether stimuli are presented in the upper or lower regions of the peripheral visual field, but has been argued to be negative for stimuli presented to the fovea. However, there has yet to be a systematic investigation into the extent to which the peripheral C1 (pC1) and foveal C1 (fC1) can be differentiated on the basis of response characteristics to different stimuli. The current study employed checkerboard patterns (Exp 1) and sinusoidal gratings of different spatial frequency (Exp 2) presented to the fovea or within one of the four quadrants of the peripheral visual field. The checkerboard stimuli yielded a sizable difference in peak component latency, with the fC1 peaking ~32 ms after the pC1. Further, the pC1 showed a band-pass response magnitude profile that peaked at 4 cycles per degree (cpd), whereas the fC1 was high-pass for spatial frequency, with a cut-off around 4 cpd. Finally, the scalp topographies of the pC1 and fC1 in both experiments differed greatly, with the fC1 being more posterior than the pC1. The results reported here call into question recent attempts to characterize general C1 processes without regard to whether stimuli are placed in the fovea or in the periphery.
引用
收藏
页码:506 / 514
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On the Differentiation of Foveal and Peripheral Early Visual Evoked Potentials
    Hansen, Bruce C.
    Haun, Andrew M.
    Johnson, Aaron P.
    Ellemberg, Dave
    BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 2016, 29 (04) : 506 - 514
  • [2] Visual evoked potentials to peripheral stimulation
    Kuba, M.
    Kremlacek, J.
    Vit, F.
    Langrova, J.
    Szanyi, J.
    Kubova, Z.
    PERCEPTION, 2012, 41 : 250 - 250
  • [3] COLOR AND BRIGHTNESS COMPONENTS OF FOVEAL VISUAL EVOKED-POTENTIALS IN MAN
    PAULUS, WM
    HOMBERG, V
    CUNNINGHAM, K
    HALLIDAY, AM
    ROHDE, N
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1984, 58 (02): : 107 - 119
  • [4] Effects of Attention on Pattern-Reversal Visual Evoked Potentials: Foveal Field Stimulation Versus Peripheral Field Stimulation
    Minoru Hoshiyama
    Ryusuke Kakigi
    Brain Topography, 2001, 13 : 293 - 298
  • [5] Effects of attention on pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials: Foveal field stimulation versus peripheral field stimulation
    Hoshiyama, M
    Kakigi, R
    BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 2001, 13 (04) : 293 - 298
  • [6] SCALP DISTRIBUTION OF VISUAL EVOKED-POTENTIALS TO FOVEAL PATTERN AND LUMINANCE STIMULI
    EDWARDS, L
    DRASDO, N
    DOCUMENTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 1987, 66 (04) : 301 - 311
  • [7] Early visual evoked potentials in callosal agenesis
    Barr, MS
    Hamm, JP
    Kirk, IJ
    Corballis, MC
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 19 (06) : 707 - 727
  • [8] Visual evoked potentials in early multiple sclerosis
    Maximov, R
    Muravyova, SV
    PERCEPTION, 2002, 31 : 166 - 167
  • [9] FOVEAL XENON FLASH DISRUPTION OF STEADY-STATE VISUAL EVOKED-POTENTIALS
    SCHMEISSER, ET
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 1984, 61 (05): : 304 - 309
  • [10] AUDITORY EVOKED-POTENTIALS FOR PERIPHERAL AND CENTRAL TINNITUS DIFFERENTIATION
    DELAVERNHELEMAIRE, MC
    BEUTTER, P
    ARCHIVES INTERNATIONALES DE PHYSIOLOGIE DE BIOCHIMIE ET DE BIOPHYSIQUE, 1989, 97 (02): : 135 - 144