Patient stratification for determining optimal second-line and third-line therapy for type 2 diabetes: the TriMaster study

被引:0
|
作者
Beverley M. Shields
John M. Dennis
Catherine D. Angwin
Fiona Warren
William E. Henley
Andrew J. Farmer
Naveed Sattar
Rury R. Holman
Angus G. Jones
Ewan R. Pearson
Andrew T. Hattersley
机构
[1] University of Exeter,Department of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences
[2] University of Exeter Medical School,Clinical Trials Unit
[3] University of Exeter Medical School,Institute of Health Research
[4] University of Oxford,Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences
[5] University of Glasgow,School of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Health
[6] University of Oxford,Diabetes Trials Unit, Radcliffe Department of Medicine
[7] University of Dundee,Population Health & Genomics, School of Medicine
来源
Nature Medicine | 2023年 / 29卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Precision medicine aims to treat an individual based on their clinical characteristics. A differential drug response, critical to using these features for therapy selection, has never been examined directly in type 2 diabetes. In this study, we tested two hypotheses: (1) individuals with body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2, compared to BMI ≤ 30 kg/m2, have greater glucose lowering with thiazolidinediones than with DPP4 inhibitors, and (2) individuals with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 60–90 ml/min/1.73 m2, compared to eGFR >90 ml/min/1.73 m2, have greater glucose lowering with DPP4 inhibitors than with SGLT2 inhibitors. The primary endpoint for both hypotheses was the achieved HbA1c difference between strata for the two drugs. In total, 525 people with type 2 diabetes participated in this UK-based randomized, double-blind, three-way crossover trial of 16 weeks of treatment with each of sitagliptin 100 mg once daily, canagliflozin 100 mg once daily and pioglitazone 30 mg once daily added to metformin alone or metformin plus sulfonylurea. Overall, the achieved HbA1c was similar for the three drugs: pioglitazone 59.6 mmol/mol, sitagliptin 60.0 mmol/mol and canagliflozin 60.6 mmol/mol (P = 0.2). Participants with BMI > 30 kg/m2, compared to BMI ≤ 30 kg/m2, had a 2.88 mmol/mol (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.98, 4.79) lower HbA1c on pioglitazone than on sitagliptin (n = 356, P = 0.003). Participants with eGFR 60–90 ml/min/1.73 m2, compared to eGFR >90 ml/min/1.73 m2, had a 2.90 mmol/mol (95% CI: 1.19, 4.61) lower HbA1c on sitagliptin than on canagliflozin (n = 342, P = 0.001). There were 2,201 adverse events reported, and 447/525 (85%) randomized participants experienced an adverse event on at least one of the study drugs. In this precision medicine trial in type 2 diabetes, our findings support the use of simple, routinely available clinical measures to identify the drug class most likely to deliver the greatest glycemic reduction for a given patient. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02653209; ISRCTN registration: 12039221.)
引用
收藏
页码:376 / 383
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] After standard treatment, do the second-line and third-line treatments make sense?
    Sabbatini, R
    Maur, M
    Mucciarini, C
    Conte, PF
    TUMORI, 2003, : S33 - S34
  • [22] Patient Preferences Informing Choice of Second-Line Type 2 Diabetes Medications
    Golembiewski, Elizabeth
    Garcia, Andrea E.
    Polley, Eric
    Umpierrez, Guillermo
    Galindo, Rodolfo J.
    Brito, Juan
    Montori, Victor M.
    Mickelson, Mindy
    Mccoy, Rozalina G.
    DIABETES, 2023, 72
  • [23] PATIENT PREFERENCES FOR SECOND-LINE MEDICATIONS TO MANAGE TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS
    Ozdemir, Semra
    Baid, Drishti
    Verghese, Naina
    Lam, Amanda Yun Rui
    Lee, Phong Ching
    Ying, Lim Adoree Yi
    Zhu, Ling
    Finkelstein, Eric A.
    Goh, Su-Yen
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2020, 40 (01) : E286 - E287
  • [24] Estimating the effects of second-line therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus: retrospective cohort study
    Gottlieb, Assaf
    Yanover, Chen
    Cahan, Amos
    Goldschmidt, Yaara
    BMJ OPEN DIABETES RESEARCH & CARE, 2017, 5 (01)
  • [25] Second-line Glucose-Lowering Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
    Shin, Jung-Im
    CURRENT DIABETES REPORTS, 2019, 19 (08)
  • [26] Second-line Glucose-Lowering Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
    Jung-Im Shin
    Current Diabetes Reports, 2019, 19
  • [27] Choosing a second-line therapy after metformin in type 2 diabetes mellitus
    Carol Wilson
    Nature Reviews Endocrinology, 2012, 8 (8) : 441 - 441
  • [28] Second-Line and Third-Line Therapy with Nanoliposomal Irinotecan (nal-IRI) in pancreatic cancer: A Single Center Experience
    Moehring, Christian
    Graffe, Freddy Jose Frontado
    Bartels, Alexandra
    Sadeghlar, Farsaneh
    Zhou, Taotao
    Mahn, Robert
    Marinova, Milka
    Feldmann, Georg
    Brossart, Peter
    Glowka, Tim
    Kalff, Joerg C.
    Strassburg, Christian P.
    Gonzalez-Carmona, Maria Angeles
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2022, 45 (SUPPL 3) : 92 - 92
  • [29] TriMaster: randomised double-blind crossover study of a DPP4 inhibitor, SGLT2 inhibitor and thiazolidinedione as second-line or third-line therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes who have suboptimal glycaemic control on metformin treatment with or without a sulfonylurea-a MASTERMIND study protocol
    Angwin, Catherine
    Jenkinson, Caroline
    Jones, Angus
    Jennison, Christopher
    Henley, William
    Farmer, Andrew
    Sattar, Naveed
    Holman, Rury R.
    Pearson, Ewan
    Shields, Beverley
    Hattersley, Andrew
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (12):
  • [30] Comprehensive analysis of lung adenocarcinoma patients with gefitinib as first-line, second-line and third-line treatment
    Liu, Daoming
    Wang, Fei
    Chen, Xia
    Shi, Hong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (10): : 20171 - 20178