Patient stratification for determining optimal second-line and third-line therapy for type 2 diabetes: the TriMaster study

被引:0
|
作者
Beverley M. Shields
John M. Dennis
Catherine D. Angwin
Fiona Warren
William E. Henley
Andrew J. Farmer
Naveed Sattar
Rury R. Holman
Angus G. Jones
Ewan R. Pearson
Andrew T. Hattersley
机构
[1] University of Exeter,Department of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences
[2] University of Exeter Medical School,Clinical Trials Unit
[3] University of Exeter Medical School,Institute of Health Research
[4] University of Oxford,Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences
[5] University of Glasgow,School of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Health
[6] University of Oxford,Diabetes Trials Unit, Radcliffe Department of Medicine
[7] University of Dundee,Population Health & Genomics, School of Medicine
来源
Nature Medicine | 2023年 / 29卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Precision medicine aims to treat an individual based on their clinical characteristics. A differential drug response, critical to using these features for therapy selection, has never been examined directly in type 2 diabetes. In this study, we tested two hypotheses: (1) individuals with body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2, compared to BMI ≤ 30 kg/m2, have greater glucose lowering with thiazolidinediones than with DPP4 inhibitors, and (2) individuals with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 60–90 ml/min/1.73 m2, compared to eGFR >90 ml/min/1.73 m2, have greater glucose lowering with DPP4 inhibitors than with SGLT2 inhibitors. The primary endpoint for both hypotheses was the achieved HbA1c difference between strata for the two drugs. In total, 525 people with type 2 diabetes participated in this UK-based randomized, double-blind, three-way crossover trial of 16 weeks of treatment with each of sitagliptin 100 mg once daily, canagliflozin 100 mg once daily and pioglitazone 30 mg once daily added to metformin alone or metformin plus sulfonylurea. Overall, the achieved HbA1c was similar for the three drugs: pioglitazone 59.6 mmol/mol, sitagliptin 60.0 mmol/mol and canagliflozin 60.6 mmol/mol (P = 0.2). Participants with BMI > 30 kg/m2, compared to BMI ≤ 30 kg/m2, had a 2.88 mmol/mol (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.98, 4.79) lower HbA1c on pioglitazone than on sitagliptin (n = 356, P = 0.003). Participants with eGFR 60–90 ml/min/1.73 m2, compared to eGFR >90 ml/min/1.73 m2, had a 2.90 mmol/mol (95% CI: 1.19, 4.61) lower HbA1c on sitagliptin than on canagliflozin (n = 342, P = 0.001). There were 2,201 adverse events reported, and 447/525 (85%) randomized participants experienced an adverse event on at least one of the study drugs. In this precision medicine trial in type 2 diabetes, our findings support the use of simple, routinely available clinical measures to identify the drug class most likely to deliver the greatest glycemic reduction for a given patient. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02653209; ISRCTN registration: 12039221.)
引用
收藏
页码:376 / 383
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient stratification for determining optimal second-line and third-line therapy for type 2 diabetes: the TriMaster study
    Shields, Beverley M. M.
    Dennis, John M. M.
    Angwin, Catherine D. D.
    Warren, Fiona
    Henley, William E. E.
    Farmer, Andrew J. J.
    Sattar, Naveed
    Holman, Rury R. R.
    Jones, Angus G. G.
    Pearson, Ewan R. R.
    Hattersley, Andrew T. T.
    NATURE MEDICINE, 2023, 29 (02) : 376 - 383
  • [2] Patient preference for second- and third-line therapies in type 2 diabetes: a prespecified secondary endpoint of the TriMaster study
    Beverley M. Shields
    Catherine D. Angwin
    Maggie H. Shepherd
    Nicky Britten
    Angus G. Jones
    Naveed Sattar
    Rury Holman
    Ewan R. Pearson
    Andrew T. Hattersley
    Nature Medicine, 2023, 29 : 384 - 391
  • [3] Patient preference for second- and third-line therapies in type 2 diabetes: a prespecified secondary endpoint of the TriMaster study
    Shields, Beverley M.
    Angwin, Catherine D.
    Shepherd, Maggie H.
    Britten, Nicky
    Jones, Angus G.
    Sattar, Naveed
    Holman, Rury
    Pearson, Ewan R.
    Hattersley, Andrew T.
    NATURE MEDICINE, 2023, 29 (02) : 384 - 391
  • [4] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF ORAL SEMAGLUTIDE AS THE SECOND-LINE AND THIRD-LINE TREATMENT FOR TYPE 2 DIABETES PATIENT
    Tan, E. C. H.
    Yang, M. C.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (12) : S52 - S53
  • [5] Second-line Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes
    Krome, Susanne
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2024, 149 (19) : 1127 - 1128
  • [6] A Phase II Study of Ganetespib as Second-line or Third-line Therapy for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
    Cardin, Dana B.
    Thota, Ramya
    Goff, Laura W.
    Berlin, Jordan D.
    Jones, Clyde M.
    Ayers, Gregory D.
    Whisenant, Jennifer G.
    Chan, Emily
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2018, 41 (08): : 772 - 776
  • [7] Second-line and third-line chemotherapy in malignant gliomas:: Is there a benefit?
    Pace, A.
    Fabi, A.
    Mirri, A.
    Vidiri, A.
    Cianciulli, A.
    Merola, R.
    Galiè, E.
    Maschio, M.
    Jandolo, B.
    Carapella, C. M.
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2006, 8 (04) : 346 - 346
  • [8] Second-line failure and first experience with third-line antiretroviral therapy in Mumbai, India
    Khan, Samsuddin
    Das, Mrinalini
    Andries, Aristomo
    Deshpande, Alaka
    Mansoor, Homa
    Saranchuk, Peter
    Isaakidis, Petros
    GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION, 2014, 7 : 1 - 6
  • [9] Second-line and third-line chemotherapy for lung cancer: Use and cost
    Ramsey, Scott D.
    Martins, Renato G.
    Blough, David K.
    Tock, Lauri S.
    Lubeck, Deborah
    Reyes, Carolina M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE, 2008, 14 (05): : 297 - 306
  • [10] Treatment of autoimmune hepatitis—First-line, second-line and third-line treatment
    Taubert R.
    Engel B.
    Die Innere Medizin, 2024, 65 (4) : 325 - 333