Suppression of pupillary unrest by general anesthesia and propofol sedation

被引:0
|
作者
Matthias Behrends
Merlin D. Larson
Andrew E. Neice
Michael P. Bokoch
机构
[1] University of California,Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care
[2] San Francisco,Department of Anesthesia
[3] Oregon Health and Science University,undefined
关键词
Pupillary; Eye; Anesthesia; Propofol;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The pupil undergoes irregular oscillations when exposed to light. These oscillations, known as pupillary unrest in ambient light, originate from oscillatory activity within the Edinger–Westphal nucleus in the midbrain. The midbrain and upper pons also contain nuclei known to be very sensitive to the effects of anesthetics that play a central role in maintaining wakefulness. We hypothesized that anesthetics may display similar effects on wakefulness and pupillary unrest. Repeat measurements of pupillary unrest using infrared pupillometry were performed in 16 patients undergoing general anesthesia and 8 patients undergoing propofol sedation. Pupil scans were analyzed using fast Fourier transformation to quantify the effects of the anesthetics on pupillary unrest. During general anesthesia and deep sedation, observed pupillary unrest values below 0.1 (AU) indicate complete suppression of pupillary oscillations. Pupillary unrest decreased more during general anesthesia [to 24% of baseline (95% CI 17–30%)] than pupil size [51% of baseline (95% CI 45–57%)]. Sedation with propofol was associated with a reduction in pupillary unrest that was correlated to the depth of sedation as assessed by the Richmond Agitation–Sedation Scale and the processed electroencephalogram. Pupillary unrest is caused by oscillatory activity within the midbrain that is affected by the state of wakefulness or by hypnotics directly. Increased sedation and general anesthesia reduce and then abolish pupillary unrest as wakefulness decreases. We speculate that midbrain nuclei responsible for wakefulness and pupillary unrest are either communicating or share a similar sensitivity to the effects of commonly used anesthetics.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 323
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pupillary Unrest: Is It a Generalizable Finding?
    Kla, Koffi M.
    Coursin, Douglas B.
    Rice, Mark J.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2017, 125 (02): : 693 - 694
  • [32] Premedication modifies the quality of sedation with propofol during regional anesthesia
    Nakagawa, M
    Mammoto, T
    Sakai, T
    Kishi, Y
    Mashimo, T
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2001, 48 (03): : 284 - 287
  • [33] Correction to: Propofol: A Review of its Role in Pediatric Anesthesia and Sedation
    Vidya Chidambaran
    Andrew Costandi
    Ajay D’Mello
    CNS Drugs, 2018, 32 : 873 - 873
  • [34] Comparison of remifentanil and propofol infusions for sedation during regional anesthesia
    Lauwers, MH
    Vanlersberghe, C
    Camu, F
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 1998, 23 (01): : 64 - 70
  • [35] New technique for sedation with propofol prior to performing spinal anesthesia
    Torigoe, K
    Sumiya, Y
    Shimizu, N
    Kobayashi, Y
    Shiratori, R
    NEW BALANCED ANESTHESIA, 1998, 1164 : 163 - 164
  • [36] Premedication modifies the quality of sedation with propofol during regional anesthesia
    Masashi Nakagawa
    Tadanori Mammoto
    Toshiko Sakai
    Yoshihiko Kishi
    Takashi Mashino
    Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 2001, 48 : 284 - 287
  • [37] SEDATION DURING SPINAL-ANESTHESIA - COMPARISON OF PROPOFOL AND MIDAZOLAM
    WILSON, E
    DAVID, A
    MACKENZIE, N
    GRANT, IS
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1990, 64 (01) : 48 - 52
  • [39] Latency of pupillary reflex dilation during general anesthesia
    Larson, MD
    Berry, PD
    May, J
    Bjorksten, A
    Sessler, DI
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 97 (02) : 725 - 730
  • [40] Levobupivacaine Infiltration with Midazolam Sedation vs. Propofol-based General Anesthesia for Minimal Invasive Parathyroidectomy
    Feng, Wei
    Li, Yun
    Li, Xuefeng
    Li, Longyun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 15 (01) : 84 - 91