Shortfalls in the global protected area network at representing marine biodiversity

被引:0
|
作者
Carissa J. Klein
Christopher J. Brown
Benjamin S. Halpern
Daniel B. Segan
Jennifer McGowan
Maria Beger
James E.M. Watson
机构
[1] Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science,
[2] School of Geography Planning and Environmental Management,undefined
[3] University of Queensland,undefined
[4] The Global Change Institute,undefined
[5] University of Queensland,undefined
[6] Australian Rivers Institute,undefined
[7] Griffith University,undefined
[8] Imperial College London,undefined
[9] Silwood Park Campus,undefined
[10] The Bren School of Environmental Science and Management,undefined
[11] University of California,undefined
[12] National Center for Ecological Analysis & Synthesis,undefined
[13] Wildlife Conservation Society,undefined
[14] Global Conservation Program,undefined
[15] Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science,undefined
[16] School of Biological Sciences,undefined
[17] University of Queensland,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The first international goal for establishing marine protected areas (MPAs) to conserve the ocean’s biodiversity was set in 2002. Since 2006, the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) has driven MPA establishment, with 193 parties committed to protecting >10% of marine environments globally by 2020, especially ‘areas of particular importance for biodiversity’ (Aichi target 11). This has resulted in nearly 10 million km2 of new MPAs, a growth of ~360% in a decade. Unlike on land, it is not known how well protected areas capture marine biodiversity, leaving a significant gap in our understanding of existing MPAs and future protection requirements. We assess the overlap of global MPAs with the ranges of 17,348 marine species (fishes, mammals, invertebrates) and find that 97.4% of species have <10% of their ranges represented in stricter conservation classes. Almost all (99.8%) of the very poorly represented species (<2% coverage) are found within exclusive economic zones, suggesting an important role for particular nations to better protect biodiversity. Our results offer strategic guidance on where MPAs should be placed to support the CBD’s overall goal to avert biodiversity loss. Achieving this goal is imperative for nature and humanity, as people depend on biodiversity for important and valuable services.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Nearshore species biodiversity of a marine protected area off Santa Catalina Island, California
    Looby, Audrey
    Ginsburg, David W.
    WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2021, 81 (01) : 113 - 130
  • [42] Using stakeholders' perspective of ecosystem services and biodiversity features to plan a marine protected area
    Francisco Carcamo, P.
    Garay-Fluehmann, Rosa
    Squeo, Francisco A.
    Gaymer, Carlos F.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2014, 40 : 116 - 131
  • [43] Marine Protected Area Costs as "Beneficial" Fisheries Subsidies: A Global Evaluation
    Cullis-Suzuki, Sarika
    Pauly, Daniel
    COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2010, 38 (02) : 113 - 121
  • [44] Explaining global patterns and trends in marine protected area (MPA) development
    Fox, Helen E.
    Soltanoff, Carrie S.
    Mascia, Michael B.
    Haisfield, Kelly M.
    Lombana, Alfonso V.
    Pyke, Christopher R.
    Wood, Louisa
    MARINE POLICY, 2012, 36 (05) : 1131 - 1138
  • [45] Role of Protected Area in Conserving Biodiversity
    Pal, Pranab
    PROGRESS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL III: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2011 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, : 3 - 8
  • [46] Conservation of aquatic insect species across a protected area network: null model reveals shortfalls of biogeographical knowledge
    Robinson, Jason L.
    Fordyce, James A.
    Parker, Charles R.
    JOURNAL OF INSECT CONSERVATION, 2016, 20 (04) : 565 - 581
  • [47] Conservation of aquatic insect species across a protected area network: null model reveals shortfalls of biogeographical knowledge
    Jason L. Robinson
    James A. Fordyce
    Charles R. Parker
    Journal of Insect Conservation, 2016, 20 : 565 - 581
  • [48] Representation of biodiversity and ecosystem services in East Africa’s protected area network
    Fangli Wei
    Shuai Wang
    Bojie Fu
    Yanxu Liu
    Ambio, 2020, 49 : 245 - 257
  • [49] Representation of biodiversity and ecosystem services in East Africa's protected area network
    Wei, Fangli
    Wang, Shuai
    Fu, Bojie
    Liu, Yanxu
    AMBIO, 2020, 49 (01) : 245 - 257
  • [50] Assessing the ecological coherence of a marine protected area network in the Celtic Seas
    Foster, Nicola L.
    Rees, Sian
    Langmead, Olivia
    Griffiths, Charly
    Oates, Jenny
    Attrill, Martin J.
    ECOSPHERE, 2017, 8 (02):