The cognitive loci of the display and task-relevant set size effects on distractor interference: Evidence from a dual-task paradigm

被引:0
|
作者
Bo Youn Park
Sujin Kim
Yang Seok Cho
机构
[1] Korea University,Department of Psychology
来源
关键词
Attention: Selective; Dual task procedures (PRP); Dual-task performance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The congruency effect of a task-irrelevant distractor has been found to be modulated by task-relevant set size and display set size. The present study used a psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm to examine the cognitive loci of the display set size effect (dilution effect) and the task-relevant set size effect (perceptual load effect) on distractor interference. A tone discrimination task (Task 1), in which a response was made to the pitch of the target tone, was followed by a letter discrimination task (Task 2) in which different types of visual target display were used. In Experiment 1, in which display set size was manipulated to examine the nature of the display set size effect on distractor interference in Task 2, the modulation of the congruency effect by display set size was observed at both short and long stimulus-onset asynchronies (SOAs), indicating that the display set size effect occurred after the target was selected for processing in the focused attention stage. In Experiment 2, in which task-relevant set size was manipulated to examine the nature of the task-relevant set size effect on distractor interference in Task 2, the effects of task-relevant set size increased with SOA, suggesting that the target selection efficiency in the preattentive stage was impaired with increasing task-relevant set size. These results suggest that display set size and task-relevant set size modulate distractor processing in different ways.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 351
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Swallowing lateralization: The effects of modified dual-task interference
    Daniels, SK
    Corey, DM
    Fraychinaud, A
    DePolo, A
    Foundas, AL
    DYSPHAGIA, 2006, 21 (01) : 21 - 27
  • [32] Effects of Task Interference on Kinematics and Dual-Task Cost of Running in Early Childhood
    Zhao, Panchao
    Ma, Kai
    Ji, Zhongqiu
    Jiang, Guiping
    SENSORS, 2024, 24 (05)
  • [33] The interaction of task-relevant and task-irrelevant stimulus features in the number/size congruency paradigm:: An ERP study
    Szucs, Denes
    Soltesz, Fruzsina
    BRAIN RESEARCH, 2008, 1190 : 143 - 158
  • [34] Negative priming is stronger for task-relevant dimensions: Evidence of flexibility in the selective ignoring of distractor information
    Frings, C
    Wentura, D
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 59 (04): : 683 - 693
  • [35] Working memory impairments in multiple sclerosis: Evidence from a dual-task paradigm
    DEsposito, M
    Onishi, K
    Thompson, H
    Robinson, K
    Armstrong, C
    Grossman, M
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 10 (01) : 51 - 56
  • [36] Verbal Implicit Statistical Learning: Evidence for Dual-Task Interference
    Noonan, Nicolette Breeze
    Archibald, Lisa
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 2014, 68 (04): : 298 - 298
  • [37] Locus of Semantic Interference in Picture Naming: Evidence From Dual-Task Performance
    Piai, Vitoria
    Roelofs, Ardi
    Schriefers, Herbert
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2014, 40 (01) : 147 - 165
  • [38] Differential contributions of set-shifting and monitoring to dual-task interference
    Cooper, Richard P.
    Wutke, Karolina
    Davelaar, Eddy J.
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 65 (03): : 587 - 612
  • [39] Neuronal correlates of cognitive resource allocation revealed by a dual-task paradigm
    Watanabe, Kei
    Funahashi, Shintaro
    NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 2011, 71 : E381 - E381
  • [40] The Effects of Dual-Task Cognitive Interference and Environmental Challenges on Balance in Huntington's Disease
    Purcell, Nicollette L.
    Goldman, Jennifer G.
    Ouyang, Bichun
    Bernard, Bryan
    Okeefe, Joan A.
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2019, 6 (03): : 202 - 212