Phylogenetic relationships within the ‘core’ Laureae (Litsea complex, Lauraceae) inferred from sequences of the chloroplast gene matK and nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS regions
被引:0
|
作者:
Jie Li
论文数: 0|引用数: 0|
h-index: 0|
机构:Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden,Laboratory of Plant Phylogenetics and Conservation Biology
Jie Li
D. C. Christophel
论文数: 0|引用数: 0|
h-index: 0|
机构:Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden,Laboratory of Plant Phylogenetics and Conservation Biology
D. C. Christophel
J. G. Conran
论文数: 0|引用数: 0|
h-index: 0|
机构:Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden,Laboratory of Plant Phylogenetics and Conservation Biology
J. G. Conran
Hsi-Wen Li
论文数: 0|引用数: 0|
h-index: 0|
机构:Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden,Laboratory of Plant Phylogenetics and Conservation Biology
Hsi-Wen Li
机构:
[1] Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden,Laboratory of Plant Phylogenetics and Conservation Biology
[2] University of Denver,Department of Biological Science
[3] Discipline of Environmental Biology,Centre for Evolutionary Biology and Biodiversity
A phylogenetic analysis of the ‘core’ Laureae (Litsea complex) was conducted using the chloroplast gene matK and nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS sequences to investigate generic relationships and boundaries within the complex. Despite low genetic divergence for matK, rooting of the tree with Sassafras resulted in Iteadaphne as the basal member of the complex and five resolved clades: a Neolitsea clade and then Laurus, Parasassafras, Litsea and Lindera clades in a large polytomy with unresolved Lindera sections plus Umbellularia. A combined analysis of the data (identical to the ITS results) provided a more resolved phylogeny of the Laureae, with four major lineages: the Laurus, Litsea, Lindera and Actinodaphne II clades. These clades also appear to reflect the importance of inflorescence structure and ontogeny within the Laureae, as well as data from cuticular micromorphology, but there was no support for traditional generic characters such as 2- versus 4- celled anthers. As a result, genera such as Actinodaphne, Litsea, Neolitsea and Lindera were polyphyletic in all analyses. Parasassafras was related to Sinosassafras by the matK data, but distant from it in the ITS and combined analyses.