Validation of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia in an Iranian population

被引:0
|
作者
Ali Bidari
Morteza Hassanzadeh
Banafsheh Ghavidel Parsa
Nahid Kianmehr
Ali Kabir
Sara Pirhadi
Mohammad Sayfi
Mehrangiz Toutounchi
Fariba Fattahi
Fereidoon Zandi Karimi
机构
[1] Iran University of Medical Sciences,Department of Rheumatology
[2] Iran University of Medical Sciences,Department of Internal Medicine
[3] Guilan University of Medical Sciences,Rheumatology Research Center, Razi Hospital, School of Medicine
[4] Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences,Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Public Health
[5] Tehran University of Medical Sciences,Center for Educational Research in Medical Sciences
[6] Islamic Azad University,Department of Computer Engineering, Science and Research Branch
[7] Guilan University of Medical Sciences,Department of Internal Medicine
[8] Iranian Center for Medical Laser (ICML),Medical Laser Research Center
[9] Academic Center for Education,undefined
[10] Culture and Research (ACECR),undefined
[11] Hazarat-e-Rasool Akram Medical Center,undefined
来源
关键词
Fibromyalgia; American College of Rheumatology criteria; Validation studies; Iran;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to validate the 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) preliminary criteria for fibromyalgia (FM) in an Iranian population. In this multicenter prospective study, we enrolled 168 FM patients and 110 controls. All participants underwent dolorimetry examination by study assessors and completed a questionnaire containing variables of both the ACR 2010 preliminary and ACR 1990 criteria. We compared the performance of the ACR 2010 criteria with the expert diagnosis as well as the ACR 1990 criteria. Receiver operator characteristic analyses and Youden index were used to evaluate the test characteristics of a set of different cutoff points for two subcomponents of ACR 2010 criteria including widespread pain index (WPI) and symptom severity (SS) scale. Considering expert diagnosis as the gold standard, the ACR 2010 criteria showed comparable specificity with ACR 1990 (92.8 vs. 88.3 %, P = 0.073), but lower sensitivity (58.9 vs. 71.4 %, P = 0.003) and a tendency for lower accuracy (72.4 vs. 78.4 %, P = 0.105). Applying the ACR 1990 criteria as the gold standard, we observed a trend toward an increase in overall accuracy (72.4 vs. 79.1 %, P = 0.064). Optimal test characteristics were achieved for WPI ≥6 and SS scale score ≥4 and improved sensitivity and accuracy of ACR 2010 criteria when compared to expert, 76.1 and 81.7, respectively. The preliminary ACR 2010 criteria performed less desirably in terms of sensitivity in our set of Iranian patients. Selecting lower cutoff points as WPI ≥6 and SS scale score ≥4 improved the diagnostic values of the criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:2999 / 3007
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effects of fibromyalgia syndrome in patients with diffuse systemic sclerosis: Evaluation with 2010 American college of rheumatology criteria set
    Ayan, Ayse
    Hekim, Hanife Hale
    Cetin, Sebahat Yaprak
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2022, 17 (02) : 129 - 135
  • [32] Difference of fibromyalgia symptom scale between the Japanese version of the 2010 ACR preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia and the modification of the ACR preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia
    Toda, Katsuhiro
    MODERN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2012, 22 (02) : 316 - 316
  • [33] Modifications of the American College of Rheumatology 2010 Preliminary Diagnostic Criteria for Fibromyalgia Syndrome and Measurement of Symptom Severity as a Screening Tool for its Diagnosis [ACR 2010 FMS-STD]: Lessons Learned from the Process of Translation and Validation into a Thai Version
    Prateepavanich, Pradit
    Aromdee, Emvalee
    Chaudakshetrin, Pongparadee
    Laurujisawat, Puchong
    Poungvarin, Niphon
    Leartsakulpanitch, Jittrakul
    Petcharapiruch, Sirinthip
    JOURNAL OF MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN, 2014, 22 (01): : 7 - 12
  • [34] Performance of the American College of Rheumatology 2016 criteria for fibromyalgia in a referral care setting
    Sakir Ahmed
    Amita Aggarwal
    Able Lawrence
    Rheumatology International, 2019, 39 : 1397 - 1403
  • [35] New American College of Rheumatology Criteria for Fibromyalgia: A Twenty-Year Journey
    Wolfe, Frederick
    ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2010, 62 (05) : 583 - 584
  • [36] Performance of the American College of Rheumatology 2016 criteria for fibromyalgia in a referral care setting
    Ahmed, Sakir
    Aggarwal, Amita
    Lawrence, Able
    RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 39 (08) : 1397 - 1403
  • [37] THE AMERICAN-COLLEGE-OF-RHEUMATOLOGY 1990 CRITERIA FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF FIBROMYALGIA - REPORT OF THE MULTICENTER CRITERIA COMMITTEE
    WOLFE, F
    SMYTHE, HA
    YUNUS, MB
    BENNETT, RM
    BOMBARDIER, C
    GOLDENBERG, DL
    TUGWELL, P
    CAMPBELL, SM
    ABELES, M
    CLARK, P
    FAM, AG
    FARBER, SJ
    FIECHTNER, JJ
    FRANKLIN, CM
    GATTER, RA
    HAMATY, D
    LESSARD, J
    LICHTBROUN, AS
    MASI, AT
    MCCAIN, GA
    REYNOLDS, WJ
    ROMANO, TJ
    RUSSELL, IJ
    SHEON, RP
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1990, 33 (02): : 160 - 172
  • [38] Classification of Rheumatoid Arthritis Comparison of the 1987 American College of Rheumatology Criteria and the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Criteria
    van der Linden, M. P. M.
    Knevel, R.
    Huizinga, T. W. J.
    van der Helm-van Mil, A. H. M.
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2011, 63 (01): : 37 - 42
  • [39] VALIDATION OF THE PROPOSED 2016 REVISION TO 2010 ACR PRELIMINARY FIBROMYALGIA DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA IN A TERTIRAY CARE SETTING
    Ahmed, S.
    Aggarwal, A.
    Lawrence, A.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2017, 76 : 388 - 388
  • [40] Comparison of the 1987 American College of Rheumatology Criteria and the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism Criteria in Patients with Established Rheumatoid Arthritis
    Hemmati, Iman
    Goycochea-Robbles, Mavis
    Sayre, Eric
    Lacaille, Diane
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2012, 39 (08) : 1713 - 1713