Reanalysis of 2D and 3D truss structures considering simultaneous variations in topology, geometry and size

被引:0
|
作者
Mohammad Rezaiee-Pajand
Mehran Momenipour
Seyed Mojtaba Hozhabrossadati
机构
[1] Ferdowsi University of Mashhad,Department of Civil Engineering
[2] Toos Institute of Higher Education,Department of Civil Engineering
来源
关键词
Reanalysis; Truss structures; Combined approximation; Rational approximation; Sherman–Morrison–Woodbury formula; Displacement error;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Approximate reanalysis methods provide effective processes to achieve structural approximate responses without solving the complete set of modified implicit analysis equations. This paper presents methods for carrying out approximate reanalysis of 2D and 3D trusses. Apparently, for the first time, the simultaneous modifications in topology, geometry and size of the structures are taken into account. Three numerical methods, namely, combined approximation, rational approximation and Sherman–Morrison–Woodbury approximation (SMWA), are analyzed and compared for this purpose. The flowchart corresponding to each scheme is presented. Design variables considered are nodal coordinates and cross sectional properties. Moreover, an arrival with bounds between zero and arbitrary amounts includes the variations of the variables. Unlike most works, large trusses with many members are analyzed as numerical examples. Based on obtained outcomes in the several instances, a comparison is conducted between the three schemes and benefits and drawbacks of each method are thoroughly discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:2341 / 2359
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Combining 2D and 3D Hand Geometry Features for Biometric Verification
    Kanhangad, Vivek
    Kumar, Ajay
    Zhang, David
    2009 IEEE COMPUTER SOCIETY CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION WORKSHOPS (CVPR WORKSHOPS 2009), VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, : 656 - 661
  • [42] 2D or not 2D That is the Question, but 3D is the, answer
    Cronin, Paul
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2007, 14 (07) : 769 - 771
  • [43] Simultaneous size and topology optimization of 3D outrigger-braced tall buildings with inclined belt truss using genetic algorithm
    Farahmand-Tabar, Salar
    Ashtari, Payam
    STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF TALL AND SPECIAL BUILDINGS, 2020, 29 (13):
  • [44] NEW PERCOLATING STRUCTURES IN RANDOM FRACTALS IN 2D AND 3D
    PERREAU, M
    LEVY, JCS
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 1989, 157 (01) : 31 - 36
  • [45] NEW MOLECULAR DESCRIPTORS FOR 2D AND 3D STRUCTURES - THEORY
    TODESCHINI, R
    LASAGNI, M
    JOURNAL OF CHEMOMETRICS, 1994, 8 (04) : 263 - 272
  • [46] Enhancement of Vascular Structures in 3D and 2D Angiographic Images
    Jerman, Tim
    Pernus, Franjo
    Likar, Bostjan
    Spiclin, Ziga
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2016, 35 (09) : 2107 - 2118
  • [47] Robotic Folding of 2D and 3D Structures from a Ribbon
    Wang, Liyu
    Plecnik, Mark M.
    Fearing, Ronald S.
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION (ICRA), 2016, : 3655 - 3660
  • [48] THE FEATURES OF ERBIUM PHOTOLUMINESCENCE IN 2D AND 3D MESOSCOPIC STRUCTURES
    Gaponenko, N. V.
    Maliarevich, G. K.
    Mudryi, A. V.
    Gusev, O. B.
    Stepikhova, M. V.
    Tsvetkov, M. Yu.
    Kleshcheva, S. M.
    Samoilovich, M. I.
    PHYSICS, CHEMISTRY AND APPLICATION OF NANOSTRUCTURES: REVIEWS AND SHORT NOTES, 2007, : 204 - +
  • [49] Generation of ground structures for 2D and 3D design domains
    Smith, OD
    ENGINEERING COMPUTATIONS, 1998, 15 (04) : 462 - +
  • [50] ON AUTOMATIC RECOGNITION OF 3D STRUCTURES FROM 2D REPRESENTATIONS
    ALDEFELD, B
    COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN, 1983, 15 (02) : 59 - 64