Reanalysis of 2D and 3D truss structures considering simultaneous variations in topology, geometry and size

被引:0
|
作者
Mohammad Rezaiee-Pajand
Mehran Momenipour
Seyed Mojtaba Hozhabrossadati
机构
[1] Ferdowsi University of Mashhad,Department of Civil Engineering
[2] Toos Institute of Higher Education,Department of Civil Engineering
来源
关键词
Reanalysis; Truss structures; Combined approximation; Rational approximation; Sherman–Morrison–Woodbury formula; Displacement error;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Approximate reanalysis methods provide effective processes to achieve structural approximate responses without solving the complete set of modified implicit analysis equations. This paper presents methods for carrying out approximate reanalysis of 2D and 3D trusses. Apparently, for the first time, the simultaneous modifications in topology, geometry and size of the structures are taken into account. Three numerical methods, namely, combined approximation, rational approximation and Sherman–Morrison–Woodbury approximation (SMWA), are analyzed and compared for this purpose. The flowchart corresponding to each scheme is presented. Design variables considered are nodal coordinates and cross sectional properties. Moreover, an arrival with bounds between zero and arbitrary amounts includes the variations of the variables. Unlike most works, large trusses with many members are analyzed as numerical examples. Based on obtained outcomes in the several instances, a comparison is conducted between the three schemes and benefits and drawbacks of each method are thoroughly discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:2341 / 2359
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reanalysis of 2D and 3D truss structures considering simultaneous variations in topology, geometry and size
    Rezaiee-Pajand, Mohammad
    Momenipour, Mehran
    Hozhabrossadati, Seyed Mojtaba
    ENGINEERING WITH COMPUTERS, 2022, 38 (03) : 2341 - 2359
  • [2] Efficient 3D truss topology optimization for aeronautical structures
    Enrico Stragiotti
    François-Xavier Irisarri
    Cédric Julien
    Joseph Morlier
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2024, 67
  • [3] Efficient 3D truss topology optimization for aeronautical structures
    Stragiotti, Enrico
    Irisarri, Francois-Xavier
    Julien, Cedric
    Morlier, Joseph
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2024, 67 (03)
  • [4] Topology of 2D and 3D rational curves
    Gerardo Alcazar, Juan
    Maria Diaz-Toca, Gema
    COMPUTER AIDED GEOMETRIC DESIGN, 2010, 27 (07) : 483 - 502
  • [5] Manipulation of 3D Cluster Size and Geometry by Release from 2D Micropatterns
    Leight, Jennifer L.
    Liu, Wendy F.
    Chaturvedi, Ritika R.
    Chen, Sophia
    Yang, Michael T.
    Raghavan, Srivatsan
    Chen, Christopher S.
    CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR BIOENGINEERING, 2012, 5 (03) : 299 - 306
  • [6] Manipulation of 3D Cluster Size and Geometry by Release from 2D Micropatterns
    Jennifer L. Leight
    Wendy F. Liu
    Ritika R. Chaturvedi
    Sophia Chen
    Michael T. Yang
    Srivatsan Raghavan
    Christopher S. Chen
    Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering, 2012, 5 : 299 - 306
  • [7] A Simultaneous 2D/3D Autostereo Workstation
    Chau, Dennis
    McGinnis, Bradley
    Talandis, Jonas
    Leigh, Jason
    Peterka, Tom
    Knoll, Aaron
    Sumer, Aslihan
    Papka, Michael
    Jellinek, Julius
    STEREOSCOPIC DISPLAYS AND APPLICATIONS XXIII, 2012, 8288
  • [8] The topology of scalar fields in 2D and 3D turbulence
    Moffatt, HK
    IUTAM SYMPOSIUM ON GEOMETRY AND STATISTICS OF TURBULENCE, 2001, 59 : 13 - 22
  • [9] Size effects in ultrafine iron. New structures: 2D - 3D
    Baldokhin, Yuriy, V
    Perfiliev, Yuriy D.
    Kulikov, Leonid A.
    NEXO REVISTA CIENTIFICA, 2021, 34 (01): : 13 - 23
  • [10] Simultaneous Topology and Size Optimization of 2D and 3D Trusses Using Evolutionary Structural Optimization with regard to Commonly Used Topologies
    Tomsic, Pavel
    Duhovnik, Joze
    ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2014,