Role of energy efficiency in climate change mitigation policy for India: assessment of co-benefits and opportunities within an integrated assessment modeling framework

被引:0
|
作者
Vaibhav Chaturvedi
Priyadarshi R. Shukla
机构
[1] Joint Global Change Research Institute,
[2] Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and University of Maryland,undefined
[3] Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad,undefined
来源
Climatic Change | 2014年 / 123卷
关键词
Energy Efficiency; Climate Policy; Abatement Cost; Energy Efficiency Improvement; Policy Scenario;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Addressing the challenges of global warming requires interventions on both the energy supply and demand side. With the supply side responses being thoroughly discussed in the literature, our paper focuses on analyzing the role of end use efficiency improvements for Indian climate change mitigation policy and the associated co-benefits, within the integrated assessment modeling framework of Global Change Assessment Model (GCAM). Six scenarios are analyzed here in total- one no climate policy and two climate policy cases, and within each of these one scenario with reference end use energy technology assumptions and another with advance end use energy technology assumptions has been analyzed. The paper has some important insights. Final energy demand and emissions in India are significantly reduced with energy efficiency improvements, and the role of this policy is important especially for the building and transportation sector under both reference and climate policy scenarios. Though energy efficiency policy should be an integral part of climate policy, by itself it is not sufficient for achieving mitigation targets, and a climate policy is necessary for achieving mitigation goals. There are significant co-benefits of energy efficiency improvements. Energy security for India is improved with reduced oil, coal and gas imports. Significant reduction in local pollutant gases is found which is important for local health concerns. Capital investment requirement for Indian electricity generation is reduced, more so for the climate policy scenarios, and finally there are significant savings in terms of reduced abatement cost for meeting climate change mitigation goals.
引用
收藏
页码:597 / 609
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [21] Ancillary health effects of climate mitigation scenarios as drivers of policy uptake: a review of air quality, transportation and diet co-benefits modeling studies
    Chang, Kelly M.
    Hess, Jeremy J.
    Balbus, John M.
    Buonocore, Jonathan J.
    Cleveland, David A.
    Grabow, Maggie L.
    Neff, Roni
    Saari, Rebecca K.
    Tessum, Christopher W.
    Wilkinson, Paul
    Woodward, Alistair
    Ebi, Kristie L.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2017, 12 (11):
  • [22] Mexico's low carbon futures: An integrated assessment for energy planning and climate change mitigation by 2050
    Elizondo, Alejandro
    Perez-Cirera, Vanessa
    Strapasson, Alexandre
    Carlos Fernandez, Jose
    Cruz-Cano, Diego
    FUTURES, 2017, 93 : 14 - 26
  • [23] Wood-Based Energy as a Strategy for Climate Change Mitigation in the Arctic-Perspectives on Assessment of Climate Impacts and Resource Efficiency with Life Cycle Assessment
    Sokka, Laura
    INTERCONNECTED ARCTIC - UARCTIC CONGRESS 2016, 2017, : 61 - 66
  • [24] Modeling the effect of climate change on U.S. state-level buildings energy demands in an integrated assessment framework
    Zhou, Yuyu
    Clarke, Leon
    Eom, Jiyong
    Kyle, Page
    Patel, Pralit
    Kim, Son H.
    Dirks, James
    Jensen, Erik
    Liu, Ying
    Rice, Jennie
    Schmidt, Laurel
    Seiple, Timothy
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 113 : 1077 - 1088
  • [25] Long term building energy demand for India: Disaggregating end use energy services in an integrated assessment modeling framework
    Chaturvedi, Vaibhav
    Eom, Jiyong
    Clarke, Leon E.
    Shukla, Priyadarshi R.
    ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 64 : 226 - 242
  • [26] Bridging the transparency gap in energy efficiency financing by co-designing an integrated assessment framework with involved actors
    Kleanthis, Nikos
    Koutsandreas, Diamantis
    Karakosta, Charikleia
    Doukas, Haris
    Flamos, Alexandros
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 : 9686 - 9699
  • [27] Energy flow modeling and life cycle assessment of apple juice production: Recommendations for renewable energies implementation and climate change mitigation
    Khanali, Majid
    Kokei, Delnia
    Aghbashlo, Mortaza
    Nasab, Forough Keyhani
    Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa
    Tabatabaei, Meisam
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 246
  • [28] An integrated assessment modeling framework for uncertainty studies in global and regional climate change: the MIT IGSM-CAM (version 1.0)
    Monier, E.
    Scott, J. R.
    Sokolov, A. P.
    Forest, C. E.
    Schlosser, C. A.
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 6 (06) : 2063 - 2085
  • [29] Gesundheitliche Vorteile von Klimaschutzmaßnahmen – wie Haushalte und Politik profitieren könnenHealth Co-benefits of climate change mitigation measures—how houeseholds and policy makers can benefit
    Alina Herrmann
    Lea de Jong
    Corinne Kowalski
    Rainer Sauerborn
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz, 2019, 62 : 556 - 564
  • [30] Integrated assessment modeling of global climate change: Transparent rational tool for policy making or opaque screen hiding value-laden assumptions?
    Schneider S.H.
    Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 1997, 2 (4) : 229 - 249