Quantifying below-ground nitrogen of legumes. 2. A comparison of 15N and non isotopic methods

被引:0
|
作者
Dil F. Khan
Mark B. Peoples
Phillip M. Chalk
David F. Herridge
机构
[1] Agricultural Research Institute,
[2] CSIRO Plant Industry,undefined
[3] Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture,undefined
[4] Vienna International Centre,undefined
[5] NSW Agriculture,undefined
[6] Tamworth Centre for Crop Improvement,undefined
来源
Plant and Soil | 2002年 / 239卷
关键词
Nodulated Root; Cicer Arietinum; Vigna Radiata; Physical Recovery; Harvest Plant Part;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Accurate information on below-ground nitrogen (N) of legumes is necessary for quantifying legume effects on soil N pools and on the N economies of crops following legumes in rotation systems. We report a series of glasshouse pot experiments to determine below-ground N (BGN) of the four legumes, fababean (Vicia faba), chickpea (Cicer arietinum), mungbean (Vigna radiata) and pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) using both 15N shoot-labelling and 15N-labelled soil isotope-dilution methods, a mass N balance approach and the physical recovery of nodulated roots. Data from the 15N shoot-labelling experiment were manipulated in different ways in an attempt to counter errors associated with uneven 15N enrichment of roots and nodules. Values for BGN as percent of total plant N based on the physical recovery of nodulated roots ranged from 4 to 15%. With 15N shoot-labelling, a total of 8.11 mg 15N was supplied to each pot (six plants) as 0.5% 15N urea using either leaf-flap (fababean, mungbean and pigeonpea), petiole (chickpea) or leaf-tip (wheat) feeding. Calculations based on measurement of 15N enrichments of harvested plant parts and root-zone soil suggested that BGN represented 39% of total plant N for fababean, 53% for chickpea, 20% for mungbean and 47% for pigeonpea. The value for wheat was 60%. Adjustment for uneven nodulation patterns on the roots and nodule 15N depletion, resulting in different 15N enrichments between nodulated and unnodulated roots, reduced the fababean value to 37% and chickpea to 42%. Values using the other methods were generally in the same range, viz. 15–57% (simple 15N balance), 11–52% (soil 15N dilution) and 30–52% (mass N balance). We conclude that physical recovery of roots was the most inaccurate method for estimating BGN. Average values for BGN as percent of total plant N using all isotopic and mass N balance methods were 30% for fababean, 48% for chickpea, 28% for mungbean, and 43% for pigeonpea.15N shoot-labelling may be the best method for quantifying BGN of field-grown plants. The methodology is simple, apparently accurate provided care is taken in obtaining representative nodulated root samples and, unlike the soil 15N dilution method, does not require pre-treatment of the soil with 15N enriched material.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 289
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quantifying the nitrogen isotope effects during photochemical equilibrium between NO and NO2: implications for δ15N in tropospheric reactive nitrogen
    Li, Jianghanyang
    Zhang, Xuan
    Orlando, John
    Tyndall, Geoffrey
    Michalski, Greg
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2020, 20 (16) : 9805 - 9819
  • [32] NITROGEN-FIXATION IN CHICKPEA .2. COMPARISON OF N-15 ENRICHMENT AND N-15 NATURAL-ABUNDANCE METHODS FOR ESTIMATING NITROGEN-FIXATION
    DOUGHTON, JA
    SAFFIGNA, PG
    VALLIS, I
    MAYER, RJ
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1995, 46 (01): : 225 - 236
  • [33] A COMPARISON OF SEVERAL GRAIN LEGUMES AT 2 SOWING TIMES .2. DISTRIBUTION OF NITROGEN WITHIN ABOVE-GROUND COMPONENTS
    WITHERS, NJ
    WATKIN, BR
    FORDE, BJ
    NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1981, 24 (02) : 203 - 215
  • [34] Can differences in 15N natural abundance be used to quantify the transfer of nitrogen from legumes to neighbouring non-legume plant species?
    Peoples, Mark B.
    Chalk, Phillip M.
    Unkovich, Murray J.
    Boddey, Robert M.
    SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2015, 87 : 97 - 109
  • [35] Comparison of natural abundance and enriched 15N methods to quantify nitrogen fertilizer recovery in maize under field conditions
    Manandhar, Sarita
    Martinez, Cristina
    Menzies, Neal W.
    Dalal, Ram C.
    Bell, Michael
    PLANT AND SOIL, 2024,
  • [36] EVALUATION OF METHODS FOR N-15 ANALYSIS OF INORGANIC NITROGEN IN SOIL EXTRACTS .2. DIFFUSION METHODS
    HERMAN, DJ
    BROOKS, PD
    ASHRAF, M
    AZAM, F
    MULVANEY, RL
    COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 1995, 26 (11-12) : 1675 - 1685
  • [37] A COMPARISON OF THE RECOVERY OF ISOTOPIC AND OF DIAZOTIZABLE NITROGEN FOLLOWING GASTRIC INTUBATION OF 2-ACETYLAMINOFLUORENE-N15 TO RATS
    DYER, HM
    DAMRON, CM
    MORRIS, HP
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1953, 14 (01) : 93 - 104
  • [38] Quantification of symbiotic nitrogen fixation by Elaeagnus angustifolia L. on salt-affected irrigated croplands using two 15N isotopic methods
    Djumaeva, D.
    Lamers, J. P. A.
    Martius, C.
    Khamzina, A.
    Ibragimov, N.
    Vlek, P. L. G.
    NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 2010, 88 (03) : 329 - 339
  • [39] Quantification of symbiotic nitrogen fixation by Elaeagnus angustifolia L. on salt-affected irrigated croplands using two 15N isotopic methods
    D. Djumaeva
    J. P. A. Lamers
    C. Martius
    A. Khamzina
    N. Ibragimov
    P. L. G. Vlek
    Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2010, 88 : 329 - 339
  • [40] Quantifying N2O reduction to N2 based on N2O isotopocules - validation with independent methods (helium incubation and 15N gas flux method)
    Lewicka-Szczebak, Dominika
    Augustin, Juergen
    Giesemann, Anette
    Well, Reinhard
    BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2017, 14 (03) : 711 - 732