Response Surface Methodology as an Optimization Tool for Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste

被引:0
|
作者
Brayan Alexis Parra-Orobio
Wilmar Alexander Torres-López
Patricia Torres-Lozada
机构
[1] Universidad del Valle,Faculty of Natural Sciences
[2] Faculty of Engineering,undefined
[3] Study and Control of Environmental Pollution-ECCA Research Group. ,undefined
[4] Universidad del Valle,undefined
来源
关键词
Biochemical methane potential; Bioenergy; Food waste; Optimization; pH; S/I ratio;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Biowastes are the main fraction of municipal solid waste (MSW), and of this, food waste (FW) is the predominant component. Given that FW is predominantly biodegradable organic matter, approach strategies such as anaerobic digestion (AD) are suitable to apply on these substrates because these process also produces methane gas as a renewable energy source, particularly important given the depletion of nonrenewable energy sources. This study evaluated the influence of two parameters on AD: substrate-inoculum ratio (S/I: 0.5 to 2.0 gVSsubstrate gVSinoculum−1) and pH (7.0 to 8.0 units) on biochemical methane potential (BMP) using the response surface methodology (RSM), a valuable tool which can be used to establish strategies that allow for the control and optimization of the AD of FW. Of the conditions evaluated, it was found that the optimal S/I ratio and pH conditions to guarantee the highest BMP (297.05 ± 14.38 mL CH4 gVS−1) were S/I ratio = 0.19 gVSsubstrate gVSinoculum−1 and pH = 7.5. Although the hydrolysis constant (kh) was low, in all conditions, it was in the range reported for substrates with a high carbohydrate content, such as FW (0.002–0.25 day−1). In this study, pH was found to be the factor that had the most significant effect on kh and BMP.
引用
下载
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Optimization of Operational Parameters during Anaerobic Co-digestion of Food and Garden Waste
    Casallas-Ojeda, Miguel
    Soto-Paz, Jonathan
    Alfonso-Morales, Wilfredo
    Oviedo-Ocana, Edgar Ricardo
    Komilis, Dimitrios
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESSES-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2021, 8 (02): : 769 - 791
  • [32] Expanding the anaerobic digestion map: A review of intermediates in the digestion of food waste
    Hunter, Sarah M.
    Blanco, Edgar
    Borrion, Aiduan
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 767
  • [33] A comprehensive machine learning-coupled response surface methodology approach for predictive modeling and optimization of biogas potential in anaerobic Co-digestion of organic waste
    Ahmad, Aqueel
    Yadav, Ashok Kumar
    Singh, Achhaibar
    Singh, Dinesh Kumar
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2024, 180
  • [34] Methane formation from food waste by anaerobic digestion
    Parvendra Kumar
    Athar Hussain
    Shashi Kant Dubey
    Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2016, 6 : 271 - 280
  • [35] Environmental sustainability of anaerobic digestion of household food waste
    Slorach, Peter C.
    Jeswani, Harish K.
    Cuellar-Franca, Rosa
    Azapagic, Adisa
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 236 : 798 - 814
  • [36] STABILIZING THE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF FOOD WASTE FOR BIOMETHANE PRODUCTION
    Hegde, Swati
    Win, Shwe Sin
    Trabold, Thomas A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 2017,
  • [37] ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF FOOD WASTE AT VARYING OPERATING CONDITIONS
    Dhungana, Bipasyana
    Lohani, Sunil Prasad
    DETRITUS, 2020, 13 : 99 - 105
  • [38] Effects of particle size on anaerobic digestion of food waste
    Izumi, Kouichi
    Okishio, Yu-ki
    Nagao, Norio
    Niwa, Chiaki
    Yamamoto, Shuichi
    Toda, Tatsuki
    INTERNATIONAL BIODETERIORATION & BIODEGRADATION, 2010, 64 (07) : 601 - 608
  • [39] Reviewing the anaerobic digestion of food waste for biogas production
    Zhang, Cunsheng
    Su, Haijia
    Baeyens, Jan
    Tan, Tianwei
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 38 : 383 - 392
  • [40] Driving factors of foaming in anaerobic digestion of food waste
    Li, Lei
    Zhang, Zhi
    Huang, Qian
    Yang, Ping-Jin
    Wang, Xiao-Ming
    Peng, Xu-Ya
    Zhongguo Huanjing Kexue/China Environmental Science, 2023, 43 (03): : 1244 - 1255