Response Surface Methodology as an Optimization Tool for Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste

被引:0
|
作者
Brayan Alexis Parra-Orobio
Wilmar Alexander Torres-López
Patricia Torres-Lozada
机构
[1] Universidad del Valle,Faculty of Natural Sciences
[2] Faculty of Engineering,undefined
[3] Study and Control of Environmental Pollution-ECCA Research Group. ,undefined
[4] Universidad del Valle,undefined
来源
关键词
Biochemical methane potential; Bioenergy; Food waste; Optimization; pH; S/I ratio;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Biowastes are the main fraction of municipal solid waste (MSW), and of this, food waste (FW) is the predominant component. Given that FW is predominantly biodegradable organic matter, approach strategies such as anaerobic digestion (AD) are suitable to apply on these substrates because these process also produces methane gas as a renewable energy source, particularly important given the depletion of nonrenewable energy sources. This study evaluated the influence of two parameters on AD: substrate-inoculum ratio (S/I: 0.5 to 2.0 gVSsubstrate gVSinoculum−1) and pH (7.0 to 8.0 units) on biochemical methane potential (BMP) using the response surface methodology (RSM), a valuable tool which can be used to establish strategies that allow for the control and optimization of the AD of FW. Of the conditions evaluated, it was found that the optimal S/I ratio and pH conditions to guarantee the highest BMP (297.05 ± 14.38 mL CH4 gVS−1) were S/I ratio = 0.19 gVSsubstrate gVSinoculum−1 and pH = 7.5. Although the hydrolysis constant (kh) was low, in all conditions, it was in the range reported for substrates with a high carbohydrate content, such as FW (0.002–0.25 day−1). In this study, pH was found to be the factor that had the most significant effect on kh and BMP.
引用
下载
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Response Surface Methodology as an Optimization Tool for Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste
    Alexis Parra-Orobio, Brayan
    Alexander Torres-Lopez, Wilmar
    Torres-Lozada, Patricia
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2020, 231 (08):
  • [2] Biogas from food waste through anaerobic digestion: optimization with response surface methodology
    Deepanraj, B.
    Senthilkumar, N.
    Ranjitha, J.
    Jayaraj, S.
    Ong, Hwai Chyuan
    BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2021, 11 (02) : 227 - 239
  • [3] Biogas from food waste through anaerobic digestion: optimization with response surface methodology
    B. Deepanraj
    N. Senthilkumar
    J. Ranjitha
    S. Jayaraj
    Hwai Chyuan Ong
    Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2021, 11 : 227 - 239
  • [4] Response surface methodology for anaerobic digestion of waste from poultry slaughterhouse: Optimization of load and hydraulic retention time
    Habchi, Sanae
    Lahboubi, Nabila
    Sallek, Brahim
    El Bari, Hassan
    RESULTS IN ENGINEERING, 2023, 18
  • [5] Anaerobic Digestion Of Food Waste
    Goldstein, Nora
    BioCycle, 2024, 2024-JULY
  • [6] ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF FOOD WASTE
    de Oliveira, Bruna Patricia
    dos Santos Oliveira, Luisa Helena
    Martins, Gilberto
    PAPERS OF THE 25TH EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE, 2017, : 902 - 906
  • [7] Optimization of methane production during mesophilic anaerobic digestion using response surface methodology
    Elazhar, M.
    Bouchabchoub, A.
    Elazhar, F.
    Elmidaoui, A.
    Taky, M.
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2022, 250 : 172 - 180
  • [8] Optimization of Food Waste Bioevaporation Process Using Response Surface Methodology
    Yang, Benqin
    Jahng, Deokjin
    DRYING TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 33 (10) : 1188 - 1198
  • [9] Review in anaerobic digestion of food waste
    He, Kefang
    Liu, Ying
    Tian, Longjin
    He, Wanyou
    Cheng, Qunpeng
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (07)
  • [10] Statistical optimization of mixture ratio and particle size for dry co-digestion of food waste and manure by response surface methodology
    Cho, Si-Kyung
    Kim, Dong-Hoon
    Yun, Yeo-Myeong
    Jung, Kyung-Won
    Shin, Hang-Sik
    Oh, Sae-Eun
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 30 (07) : 1493 - 1496