Quantification of intrafraction prostate motion and its dosimetric effect on VMAT

被引:0
|
作者
Prabhjot Juneja
Emma Colvill
Andrew Kneebone
Thomas Eade
Jin A. Ng
David I. Thwaites
Paul Keall
Ramandeep Kaur
Per Poulsen
Jeremy T. Booth
机构
[1] Royal North Shore Hospital,Northern Sydney Cancer Centre
[2] University of Sydney,School of Physics/Medicine
[3] Aarhus University Hospital,undefined
关键词
Prostate radiation therapy; Intrafraction motion; Dose reconstruction and dosimetric impact;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Intrafraction prostate motion degrades the accuracy of radiation therapy (RT) delivery. Whilst a number of metrics in the literature have been used to quantify intrafraction prostate motion, it has not been established whether these metrics reflect the effect of motion on the RT dose delivered to the patients. In this study, prostate motion during volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment of 18 patients and a total of 294 fractions was quantified through novel metrics as well as those available in the literature. The impact of the motion on VMAT dosimetry was evaluated using these metrics and dose reconstructions based on a previously validated and published method. The dosimetric impact of the motion on planning target volume (PTV) and clinical target volume (CTV) coverage and organs at risk (OARs) was correlated with the motion metrics, using the coefficient of determination (R2), to evaluate their utility. Action level threshold for the prostate motion metric that best described the dosimetric impact on the PTV D95% was investigated through iterative regression analysis. The average (range) of the mean motion for the patient cohort was 1.5 mm (0.3–9.9 mm). A number of motion metrics were found to be strongly correlated with PTV D95%, the range of R2 was 0.43–0.81. For all the motion measures, correlations with CTV D99% (range of R2 was 0.12–0.62), rectum V65% (range of R2 was 0.33–0.58) and bladder V65% (range of R2 was 0.51–0.69) were not as strong as for PTV D95%. The mean of the highest 50% of motion metric was one of the best indicator of dosimetric impact on PTV D95%. Action level threshold value for this metric was found to be 3.0 mm. For an individual fraction, when the metric value was greater than 3.0 mm then the PTV D95% was reduced on average by 6.2%. This study demonstrated that several motion metrics are well correlated with the dosimetric impact (PTV D95%) of individual fraction prostate motion on VMAT delivery and could be used for treatment course adaptation.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 324
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dosimetric Consequences of Intrafraction Prostate Motion: Comparison Between Phantom Measurements and Three Different Calculation Methods
    Schmitt, D.
    Nill, S.
    Roeder, F.
    Herfarth, K.
    Oelfke, U.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3686 - 3686
  • [32] Dosimetric Impact of Intrafraction Prostate Motion and Interfraction Anatomical Changes in Dose-Escalated LinacBased SBRT
    Panizza, D.
    Faccenda, V.
    Daniotti, M. C.
    Trivellato, S.
    Lucchini, R.
    Pellegrini, R.
    De Ponti, E.
    Arcangeli, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2023, 117 (02): : E703 - E703
  • [33] Dosimetric impact of marker-based intrafraction motion from cine-MRI in prostate SBRT
    Kontaxis, C.
    Keizer, D. De Muinck
    Kerkmeijer, L.
    De Boer, H.
    Raaymakers, B.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 133 : S213 - S213
  • [34] Dosimetric effect of intrafraction tumor motion in phase gated lung stereotactic body radiotherapy
    Zhao, Bo
    Yang, Yong
    Li, Tianfang
    Li, Xiang
    Heron, Dwight E.
    Huq, M. Saiful
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (11) : 6629 - 6637
  • [35] Intrafraction prostate motion during IMRT for prostate cancer
    Huang, E
    Dong, L
    Chandra, A
    Kuban, DA
    Rosen, II
    Evans, A
    Pollack, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 53 (02): : 261 - 268
  • [36] The effect of abdominal compression on prostate inter and intrafraction motion during conformal radiotherapy of the prostate
    Chung, P.
    Rosewall, T.
    Bayley, A.
    Kong, V.
    Lockwood, G.
    Bristow, R.
    Crook, J.
    Gospodarowicz, M.
    McLean, M.
    Milosevic, M.
    Warde, P.
    Catton, C.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2006, 80 : S71 - S71
  • [37] Reduction in Dosimetric Impact of Motion Using VMAT Compared to IMRT in Hypofractionated Prostate Cancer Patients
    Ravindranath, B.
    Xiong, J.
    Happersett, L.
    Mageras, G.
    Zhang, P.
    Hunt, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3435 - 3435
  • [38] Estimating the dosimetric effects of intrafraction motion: the role of surface imaging
    Kugele, M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S70 - S70
  • [39] Assessment of Intrafraction Motion Based on Intraprostatic Fiducials During VMAT Delivery
    Tolakanahalli, R.
    Davis, S. D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E581 - E581
  • [40] Intrafraction Motion of Prostate in Cyberknife Hypofractionated Radiotherapy
    Xie, Y.
    Djajaputra, D.
    King, C.
    Hossain, S.
    Ma, L.
    Xing, L.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06)