Quantification of intrafraction prostate motion and its dosimetric effect on VMAT

被引:0
|
作者
Prabhjot Juneja
Emma Colvill
Andrew Kneebone
Thomas Eade
Jin A. Ng
David I. Thwaites
Paul Keall
Ramandeep Kaur
Per Poulsen
Jeremy T. Booth
机构
[1] Royal North Shore Hospital,Northern Sydney Cancer Centre
[2] University of Sydney,School of Physics/Medicine
[3] Aarhus University Hospital,undefined
关键词
Prostate radiation therapy; Intrafraction motion; Dose reconstruction and dosimetric impact;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Intrafraction prostate motion degrades the accuracy of radiation therapy (RT) delivery. Whilst a number of metrics in the literature have been used to quantify intrafraction prostate motion, it has not been established whether these metrics reflect the effect of motion on the RT dose delivered to the patients. In this study, prostate motion during volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment of 18 patients and a total of 294 fractions was quantified through novel metrics as well as those available in the literature. The impact of the motion on VMAT dosimetry was evaluated using these metrics and dose reconstructions based on a previously validated and published method. The dosimetric impact of the motion on planning target volume (PTV) and clinical target volume (CTV) coverage and organs at risk (OARs) was correlated with the motion metrics, using the coefficient of determination (R2), to evaluate their utility. Action level threshold for the prostate motion metric that best described the dosimetric impact on the PTV D95% was investigated through iterative regression analysis. The average (range) of the mean motion for the patient cohort was 1.5 mm (0.3–9.9 mm). A number of motion metrics were found to be strongly correlated with PTV D95%, the range of R2 was 0.43–0.81. For all the motion measures, correlations with CTV D99% (range of R2 was 0.12–0.62), rectum V65% (range of R2 was 0.33–0.58) and bladder V65% (range of R2 was 0.51–0.69) were not as strong as for PTV D95%. The mean of the highest 50% of motion metric was one of the best indicator of dosimetric impact on PTV D95%. Action level threshold value for this metric was found to be 3.0 mm. For an individual fraction, when the metric value was greater than 3.0 mm then the PTV D95% was reduced on average by 6.2%. This study demonstrated that several motion metrics are well correlated with the dosimetric impact (PTV D95%) of individual fraction prostate motion on VMAT delivery and could be used for treatment course adaptation.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 324
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantification of intrafraction prostate motion and its dosimetric effect on VMAT
    Juneja, Prabhjot
    Colvill, Emma
    Kneebone, Andrew
    Eade, Thomas
    Ng, Jin A.
    Thwaites, David I.
    Keall, Paul
    Kaur, Ramandeep
    Poulsen, Per
    Booth, Jeremy T.
    AUSTRALASIAN PHYSICAL & ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2017, 40 (02) : 317 - 324
  • [2] Dosimetric consequences of intrafraction prostate motion
    Li, Haisen S.
    Chetty, Indrin J.
    Enke, Charles A.
    Foster, Ryan D.
    Willoughby, Twyla R.
    Kupellian, Patrick A.
    Solberg, Timothy D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 71 (03): : 801 - 812
  • [3] Evaluation of the Dosimetric Impact of Intrafraction Motion and MLC Leaf Interplay in Hypofractionated Prostate IMRT and VMAT Treatment
    Ye, J.
    Rao, M.
    Chen, F.
    Cao, D.
    Eulau, S.
    Mate, T.
    Takamiya, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (03): : S378 - S378
  • [4] Dosimetric effect of intrafraction motion for different correction strategies in prostate SBRT
    Vanhanen, A.
    Poulsen, P.
    Kapanen, M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S64 - S64
  • [5] Dosimetric effect of intrafraction motion on hypofractionated prostate radiation therapy plans
    Roch, M.
    Castro, P.
    Anson, C.
    Hernandez, D.
    Zapatero, A.
    Garcia de Vicente, F.
    Vinals, A.
    Fayos-Sola, R.
    Perez, L.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S876 - S877
  • [6] Dosimetric effect of intrafraction motion and different localization strategies in prostate SBRT
    Vanhanen, A.
    Poulsen, P.
    Kapanen, M.
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 75 : 58 - 68
  • [7] Comparison of Dosimetric Inaccuracies Introduced by IntraFraction Respiratory Motion in IMRT and VMAT
    Atkinson, P.
    Glide-Hurst, C.
    Matuszak, M.
    Yan, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06)
  • [8] Dosimetric Evaluation of PTV Margins and Intrafraction Motion for Prostate SBRT
    Jiang, L.
    Li, H.
    Heinzerling, J.
    Boike, T.
    Solberg, T.
    Foster, R.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06)
  • [9] DOSIMETRIC EVALUATION OF MARGIN REDUCTION AND INTRAFRACTION MOTION FOR PROSTATE SBRT
    Jiang, L.
    Li, H.
    Boike, T.
    Heinzerling, J.
    Solberg, T.
    Foster, R.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 99 : S193 - S194
  • [10] Dosimetric consequences of intrafraction prostate motion in scanned ion beam radiotherapy
    Ammazzalorso, Filippo
    Graef, Sebastian
    Weber, Uli
    Wittig, Andrea
    Engenhart-Cabillic, Rita
    Jelen, Urszula
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 112 (01) : 100 - 105