Estimation of particulate matter (PM2.5, PM10) concentration and its variation over urban sites in Bangladesh

被引:0
|
作者
Amitesh Gupta
Md Moniruzzaman
Avinash Hande
Iman Rousta
Haraldur Olafsson
Karno Kumar Mondal
机构
[1] JIS University,Institute for Atmospheric Sciences
[2] Indian Institute of Remote Sensing,Weather and Climate, Meteorological Office
[3] ASICT Division,Department of Physics, Institute for Atmospheric Sciences Weather and Climate, Meteorological Office
[4] Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute,undefined
[5] Center for Space Science and Technology Education in Asia and the Pacific,undefined
[6] Savitribai Phule Pune University,undefined
[7] Yazd University,undefined
[8] University of Iceland and Icelandic,undefined
[9] University of Iceland and Icelandic,undefined
[10] Khulna University of Engineering and Technology,undefined
来源
SN Applied Sciences | 2020年 / 2卷
关键词
Particulate matter estimation; PM; PM; Support vector regression; Radial kernel; MODIS AOD;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Satellite-retrieved aerosol optical depth essentially provides an economical option for regular monitoring of particulate matter (PM) concentration; however, the constrains and challenges come in terms of estimation accuracy. In the present study, we estimated PM2.5 and PM10 (PM of aerodynamic diameter lesser than 2.5, 10 µm, respectively) for 11 sites in Bangladesh using different methods. Univariate model showed destitute performance (R2 < 0.1), whereas integrating MODIS-AOD with surface meteorology, multivariate models enhanced accuracy (R2 > 0.6); meanwhile, radial kernel-based ‘eps’-type support vector regression model outperformed rest (R2 > 0.8). Furthermore, we investigated variations in ground concentration of PM2.5, PM10 during 2013–2018 and found annual mean concentration of 76.34 ± 34.12 µg m−3 and 136.25 ± 68.94 µg m−3, respectively. Predominant anthropogenic contribution to elevated pollution is well remarked by PM2.5/PM10 ratio, highest during January (0.65 ± 0.06) and lowest during July (0.48 ± 0.11). Grievous pollution found in Narayanganj (PM2.5: 100.35 ± 56.76 µg m−3, PM10: 200.25 ± 91.79 µg m−3) and slightest in Sylhet (PM2.5: 56.13 ± 26.99 µg m−3, PM10: 103.94 ± 49.37 µg m−3). Intra-annual pattern asserts winter as sternly befouled and least pollution during monsoon, which may indicate significant influence of meteorology on PM pollution. We found that PM divulged negative correlation with air temperature (PM2.5: −0.78, PM10: −0.73), relative humidity (PM2.5: −0.66, PM10: −0.73) and rainfall (PM2.5: −0.59, PM10: −0.61). This study showed outrageous situation of PM pollution in urban areas in Bangladesh and proposed modest pathway for regular monitoring of PM that will help to combat pollution.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Estimation of Surface Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM10) Mass Concentrations from Ceilometer Backscattered Profiles
    Parde, Avinash N.
    Ghude, Sachin D.
    Pithani, Prakash
    Dhangar, Narendra G.
    Nivdange, Sandip
    Krishna, Gopal
    Lal, D. M.
    Jenamani, R.
    Singh, Pankaj
    Jena, Chinmay
    Karumuri, Ramakrishna
    Safai, P. D.
    Chate, D. M.
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (07) : 1640 - 1650
  • [32] Origin and variability of particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) mass concentrations over an Eastern Mediterranean city
    Saliba, N. A.
    El Jam, F.
    El Tayar, G.
    Obeid, W.
    Roumie, M.
    ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2010, 97 (1-2) : 106 - 114
  • [33] Particulate matter in California:: Part 2 -: Spatial, temporal, and compositional patterns of PM2.5, PM10-2.5, and PM10
    Motallebi, N
    Taylor, CA
    Croes, BE
    JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2003, 53 (12): : 1517 - 1530
  • [34] Particulate matter in California:: Part 1 -: Intercomparison of several PM2.5, PM10-2.5, and PM10 monitoring networks
    Motallebi, N
    Taylor, CA
    Turkiewicz, K
    Croes, BE
    JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2003, 53 (12): : 1509 - 1516
  • [35] Influences of wind and precipitation on different-sized particulate matter concentrations (PM2.5, PM10, PM2.5-10)
    Zhang, Boen
    Jiao, Limin
    Xu, Gang
    Zhao, Suli
    Tang, Xin
    Zhou, Yue
    Gong, Chen
    METEOROLOGY AND ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS, 2018, 130 (03) : 383 - 392
  • [36] Predictability analysis of the PM2.5 and PM10 concentration in Budapest
    Ferenczi, Zita
    IDOJARAS, 2013, 117 (04): : 359 - 375
  • [37] Preliminary analysis of variability in concentration of fine particulate matter - PM1.0, PM2.5 and PM10 in area of Poznan city
    Sowka, Izabela
    Chlebowska-Stys, Anna
    Mathews, Barbara
    X-TH SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE AIR PROTECTION IN THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2018, 28
  • [38] Individual Particle Characterization of Airborne Inhalable Particulate Matter (PM10 and PM2.5) in Zhengzhou
    Qia Yu-Shuang
    Shao Long-Yi
    Wang Jing
    Wang Jian-Ying
    CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION AND PUBLIC HEALTH, VOL 1-2, 2010, : 66 - 69
  • [39] Spatial distribution of particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) in Seoul Metropolitan Subway stations
    Kim, Ki Youn
    Kim, Yoon Shin
    Roh, Young Man
    Lee, Cheol Min
    Kim, Chi Nyon
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2008, 154 (1-3) : 440 - 443
  • [40] Chemical Characterization of Indoor and Outdoor Particulate Matter (PM2.5, PM10) in Doha, Qatar
    Saraga, Dikaia
    Maggos, Thomas
    Sadoun, Eman
    Fthenou, Eleni
    Hassan, Hala
    Tsiouri, Vasiliki
    Karavoltsos, Sotirios
    Sakellari, Aikaterini
    Vasilakos, Christos
    Kakosimos, Konstantinos
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2017, 17 (05) : 1156 - 1168