Use of atmospheric tides to estimate the hydraulic conductivity of confined and semi-confined aquifers

被引:1
|
作者
Valois, Remi [1 ,2 ]
Derode, Benoit [3 ]
Vouillamoz, Jean-Michel [4 ]
Kotchoni, D. O. Valerie [5 ]
Lawson, M. A. [5 ]
Rau, Gabriel C. [6 ]
机构
[1] French Red Cross, 4 rue Diderot, Paris, France
[2] Univ Avignon, Hydrogeol Lab, UMR EMMAH, 74 Rue Louis Pasteur, Avignon, France
[3] Univ Toulouse, Inst Rech Astrophys & Planetol, CNRS, Toulouse, France
[4] Univ Grenoble Alpes, IRD, CNRS, Grenoble INP,IGE, F-38000 Grenoble, France
[5] Univ Abomey Calavi, Natl Inst water, Abomey Calavi, Benin
[6] Univ Newcastle, Sch Environm & Life Sci, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
关键词
Atmospheric tides; Barometric response function; Groundwater hydraulics; hydraulic testing; Atmospheric pressure; WATER-LEVEL; EARTH TIDES; GROUNDWATER RESPONSE; SLUG TESTS; WELL; TRANSMISSIVITY; CONNECTIVITY; CAMBODIA; REMOVAL; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1007/s10040-023-02715-5
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Characterizing groundwater responses to natural drivers is cost effective and offers great potential in hydrogeological inves-tigations. However, there is a lack of method development and evaluation, for example by comparing results with those derived from using conventional methods. This paper presents a modified method to calculate the hydraulic conductivity (K) of confined aquifers using the well water response to atmospheric tides. The approach separates the Earth and atmospheric tide influences on filtered well water-level records in the time domain. The resulting ill-posed regression deconvolution problem can be overcome by constraining the well water response to atmospheric tides in order to follow a physically real-istic semi-diurnal barometric response function (S-2-BRF), or to follow directly a modified hydraulic model (BE-Hvorslev) similar to a slug test evaluation. An analysis with synthetic data shows that K up to 10(-4) m/s can be estimated when pressure records with short sampling intervals are available. Application to a field dataset from Cambodia and Benin, with 20-minute to 60-minute sampling intervals, respectively, results in K values of 5.82 center dot 10(-7) m/s and 2.9<middle dot>10(-7) m/s. This agrees with results independently derived from pumping tests for both confined sediments and semi-confined hard-rock conditions. This method offers a promising and low-cost approach to derive K solely from monitoring datasets in confined aquifers. This is especially advantageous for low-conductivity formations where hydraulic testing takes time.
引用
收藏
页码:2115 / 2128
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] THE LEVEL OF COPPER, IRON, MANGANESE AND ZINC IN THE BLOOD-SERUM OF SEMI-CONFINED AND CONFINED GOATS
    DASVIRGENS, NC
    NETO, JM
    ARQUIVOS DA ESCOLA DE VETERINARIA DA UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MINAS GERAIS, 1981, 33 (02): : 235 - 245
  • [32] Experimental evaluation of the conjugate anvil hammer mill - Comparison of semi-confined to confined particle breakage
    Li, Genzhuang
    Roufail, Reem
    Klein, Bern
    Nordell, Lawrence
    Kumar, Amit
    Sun, Chunbao
    Koua, Jue
    MINERALS ENGINEERING, 2019, 137 : 34 - 42
  • [33] Performance of cows and summer-born calves and economics in semi-confined and confined beef systems
    Gardine, S. E.
    Warner, J. M.
    Bondurant, R. G.
    Hilscher, F. H.
    Rasby, R. J.
    Klopfenstein, T. J.
    Watson, A. K.
    Jenkins, K. H.
    APPLIED ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2019, 35 (05): : 521 - 529
  • [35] Seismic behavior of semi-confined vs. confined brick masonry structures: An experimental analysis
    Ahmad, Imad
    Khplwak, Khyber
    Samiullah, Qazi
    Suboor, Ahmad
    Noor, Umar Ahmad
    Shahzada, Khan
    STRUCTURES, 2025, 73
  • [36] Normal and cross-flow Reynolds stresses: differences between confined and semi-confined flows
    Buschmann, M. H.
    Kempe, T.
    Indinger, Th
    Gad-el-Hak, M.
    TURBULENCE, HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER 6, 2009, : 139 - 142
  • [37] Normal and cross-flow Reynolds stresses: differences between confined and semi-confined flows
    Buschmann, Matthias H.
    Gad-el-Hak, Mohamed
    EXPERIMENTS IN FLUIDS, 2010, 49 (01) : 213 - 223
  • [38] Hydraulic Conductivity Variation in a Confined Aquifer
    Sen, Zekai
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2014, 19 (03) : 654 - 658
  • [39] Normal and cross-flow Reynolds stresses: differences between confined and semi-confined flows
    Matthias H. Buschmann
    Mohamed Gad-el-Hak
    Experiments in Fluids, 2010, 49 : 213 - 223
  • [40] Estimation of hydraulic parameters using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and empirical laws in a semi-confined aquifer
    Perdomo, Santiago
    Kruse, Eduardo E.
    Ainchil, Jeronimo E.
    NEAR SURFACE GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 16 (06) : 627 - 641