The Relationship Between Teacher Behaviours and Student Talk in Promoting Quality Learning in Science Classrooms

被引:0
|
作者
Ian Mitchell
机构
[1] Monash University,Education Faculty
来源
关键词
Constructivism; Metacognition; Quality learning; Science content; Student talk; Teacher behaviours;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper distils 24 years of classroom research into promoting quality learning in science classrooms to develop an overall framework for better understanding and describing both the learning and the teaching approaches that stimulate and support it. For me, quality learning is characterised by adjectives such as informed, purposeful, reflective, intellectually active, metacognitive and independent. Central to quality learning is the role of talk, and central to promoting talk which promotes quality learning are certain teacher behaviours. I first focus on the ways that teachers behave in the classroom in order to promote, react to and use student talk. These behaviours are summed up in a list of twelve principles for quality teaching. Each of these principles requires, as well as appropriate teacher behaviours, the use of effective teaching procedures. I then focus on four kinds of student talk that exemplify informed, purposeful, reflective and intellectually active thinking. These variously involve students’ existing ideas and explanations; increasing student ownership of practical activities; constructive challenges to the teacher (or text’s) idea, and lateral, reflective ‘thinking’ questions.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 186
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Intellectual Curiosity as a Mediator between Teacher-Student Relationship Quality and Emirati Science Achievement in PISA 2022
    Ali, Nagla
    Abu Khurma, Othman
    Jarrah, Adeeb
    [J]. EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2024, 14 (09):
  • [32] What is the Relationship Between Teacher Quality and Student Achievement? An Exploratory Study
    James H. Stronge
    Thomas J. Ward
    Pamela D. Tucker
    Jennifer L. Hindman
    [J]. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 2007, 20 (3-4) : 165 - 184
  • [33] The Relationship between Primary School Teacher and Student Attitudes towards Science and Technology
    Denessen, Eddie
    Vos, Nienke
    Hasselman, Fred
    Louws, Monika
    [J]. EDUCATION RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 2015
  • [34] The Influence of Student Personality and Teacher-student Interactions on Teacher-student Relationship Quality
    Tan, Tengteng
    Wang, Naiyi
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH (ICASSR-2013), 2013, 38 : 174 - 177
  • [35] The relationship of perceived teacher caring with student learning and teacher evaluation
    Teven, JJ
    McCroskey, JC
    [J]. COMMUNICATION EDUCATION, 1997, 46 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [36] Student Views of Teacher Actions in Science Classrooms Designed to Meet Current Reforms
    Stuart O. Yager
    Hakan Akcay
    Ozgur Kivilcan Dogan
    Robert E. Yager
    [J]. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2013, 22 : 974 - 983
  • [37] Towards effective learning with new technology resources: the role of teacher education in reconceptualising the relationship between task setting and student learning in technology-rich classrooms
    Somekh, B
    [J]. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: SUPPORTING CHANGE THROUGH TEACHER EDUCATION, 1997, : 269 - 277
  • [38] Student-centred and teacher-centred science classrooms as visualized by science teachers and their supervisors
    Al-Balushi, Sulaiman M.
    Ambusaidi, Abdullah K.
    Al-Balushi, Khadija A.
    Al-Hajri, Fatema H.
    Al-Sinani, Mohammed S.
    [J]. TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2020, 89
  • [39] Student and Teacher Perspectives Across Mathematics and Science Classrooms: The Importance of Engaging Contexts
    Appleton, James J.
    Lawrenz, Frances
    [J]. SCHOOL SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS, 2011, 111 (04) : 143 - 155
  • [40] Student Views of Teacher Actions in Science Classrooms Designed to Meet Current Reforms
    Yager, Stuart O.
    Akcay, Hakan
    Dogan, Ozgur Kivilcan
    Yager, Robert E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 22 (06) : 974 - 983