Surgical versus percutaneous tracheostomy: an evidence-based approach

被引:0
|
作者
Sotirios Pappas
Pavlos Maragoudakis
Petros Vlastarakos
Dimitrios Assimakopoulos
Thomi Mandrali
Dimitrios Kandiloros
Thomas P. Nikolopoulos
机构
[1] General Hospital of Korinthos,
[2] Lister Hospital,undefined
[3] East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust,undefined
[4] Attiko University Hospital,undefined
关键词
Tracheostomy; Surgical; Percutaneous; Evidence-based medicine; Complications; Outcome;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The choice between surgical (ST) and percutaneous tracheostomy (PT) is not often based on evidence. The aim is to evaluate the quality of evidence in published articles comparing the two methods. A MEDLINE search was done. From 298 articles found, 37 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and 35 were further analyzed. No study was based on type I evidence, 13 (37%) represented type II, in 1 (3%) a clear-cut definition between type II or III was not possible and 21 (60%) represented type III or IV evidence. Taking into account the complication rate of the 13 type II evidence studies, 7 are in favor of PT and 3 in favor of ST. The majority of studies comparing PT with ST are of type III or IV level of evidence. Even if only type II studies are analyzed, outcomes are controversial. Any claims by clinicians in favor of a particular treatment are still debatable.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 330
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An Evidence-Based Approach to the Surgical Management of Pressure Ulcers
    Levine, Steven M.
    Sinno, Sammy
    Levine, Jamie P.
    Saadeh, Pierre B.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2012, 69 (04) : 482 - 484
  • [32] Intervention in Necrotizing Pancreatitis: An Evidence-based Review of Surgical and Percutaneous Alternatives
    Edward L. Bradley
    Thomas J. Howard
    Eric van Sonnenberg
    Mehran Fotoohi
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2008, 12 : 634 - 639
  • [33] Intervention in necrotizing pancreatitis: An evidence-based review of surgical and percutaneous alternatives
    Bradley, Edward L., III
    Howard, Thomas J.
    van Sonnenberg, Eric
    Fotoohi, Mehran
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2008, 12 (04) : 634 - 639
  • [34] Percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy -: A double-blind randomized trial
    Gysin, C
    Dulguerov, P
    Guyot, JP
    Perneger, TV
    Abajo, B
    Chevrolet, JC
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1999, 230 (05) : 708 - 714
  • [35] Percutaneous dilatational versus conventional surgical tracheostomy in intensive care patients
    Youssef, Tarek F.
    Ahmed, Mohamed Rifaat
    Saber, Aly
    NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 3 (11) : 508 - 512
  • [36] A clinical and histologic comparison of percutaneous dilational versus conventional surgical tracheostomy
    Stoeckli, SJ
    Breitbach, T
    Schmid, S
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 1997, 107 (12): : 1643 - 1646
  • [37] Percutaneous versus Open Tracheostomy: Comparison of Procedures and Surgical Site Infections
    Park, Habeeba
    Kent, Jennifer
    Joshi, Manjari
    Zhu, Shijun
    Bochicchio, Grant V.
    Henry, Sharon
    Scalea, Thomas
    SURGICAL INFECTIONS, 2013, 14 (01) : 21 - 23
  • [38] Standard surgical versus percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in intensive care patients
    Lukas, Jindrich
    Duskova, Jaroslava
    Lukas, David
    Paska, Jan
    Stritesky, Martin
    Haas, Tomas
    SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 28 (10) : 1529 - 1533
  • [39] PERCUTANEOUS APPROACH TO TRACHEOSTOMY
    HOLTZMAN, RB
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1989, 17 (06) : 595 - 595
  • [40] Percutaneous versus standard tracheostomy
    Fernandez, JP
    Martin, MJA
    Lendinez, MJ
    SURGERY, 1997, 121 (01) : 112 - 112