Decision-making for the selection of different leachate treatment/management methods: the ANP and PROMETHEE approaches

被引:0
|
作者
Alp Özdemir
Aysun Özkan
Zerrin Günkaya
Müfide Banar
机构
[1] Eskişehir Technical University,Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering
[2] İki Eylül Campus,undefined
关键词
Analytic network process (ANP); Leachate treatment; Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM); Preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations (PROMETHEE);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Municipal solid waste (MSW) landfill leachate is a highly contaminated liquid effluent. Leachate has a complex nature that needs to be appropriately treated before being discharged into the environment. There are various options for leachate treatment. Deciding which option should be applied is a complex process, since it depends on many factors that need to provide a balance between the technical, economic, and environmental aspects of sustainability. Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods are useful techniques to solve complex problems that cannot be easily solved. In this study, MCDM techniques are used for an evaluation of four different leachate treatment options: recirculation of leachate to a landfill site (A1), combined treatment with municipal wastewater (A2), anaerobic and aerobic sequential treatment (A3), and advanced leachate treatment based on membrane processes (A4). The selection of the most appropriate one, based on the criteria, analytic network process (ANP), and preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations (PROMETHEE) methods, was applied as MCDM techniques using the Super Decisions software and D-Sight software, respectively. Both the ANP and the PROMETHEE analysis results demonstrate that option A2 is the most appropriate for all of the decision-makers.
引用
收藏
页码:19798 / 19809
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fuzzy PROMETHEE method for Foreign Direct Investment decision-making
    Ju, Fanghu
    Wang, Linyuani
    GMC '05: Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Global Manufacturing and China, 2005, : 324 - 328
  • [32] Approaches to Ethical Decision-Making
    Fornari, Alice
    JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF NUTRITION AND DIETETICS, 2015, 115 (01) : 119 - 121
  • [33] DECISION-MAKING APPROACHES IN MEDICINE
    BROOKS, RE
    HEISER, JF
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1979, 136 (06): : 857 - 857
  • [34] Reclamation project selection using fuzzy decision-making methods
    Yavuz, Mahmut
    Altay, Burcin Lacin
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2015, 73 (10) : 6167 - 6179
  • [35] Exploring Decision-Making Methods in Lean Construction Tool Selection
    Turkyilmaz, Osman Hulusi
    Besiktepe, Deniz
    CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH CONGRESS 2024: CONTRACTING, DELIVERY, SCHEDULING, ESTIMATING, ECONOMICS, AND ORGANIZATIONAL MANAGEMENT AND PLANNING IN CONSTRUCTION, 2024, : 382 - 392
  • [36] New Aggregation Methods for Decision-Making in the Selection of Business Opportunities
    Blanco-Mesa, Fabio R.
    Gil-Lafuente, Anna M.
    Merigo, Jose M.
    SCIENTIFIC METHODS FOR THE TREATMENT OF UNCERTAINTY IN SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2015, 377 : 3 - 18
  • [37] Supplier selection using hybrid multicriteria decision-making methods
    Tusnial, Anirudh
    Sharma, Satyendra Kumar
    Dhingra, Parth
    Routroy, Srikanta
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 70 (06) : 1393 - 1418
  • [38] LINGUISTIC METHODS OF DECISION-MAKING IN THE PROBLEM OF MULTICRITERION SELECTION OF MODELS
    SILOV, VB
    VILENCHIK, DV
    AVTOMATIKA, 1985, (04): : 88 - 89
  • [39] APPROACHES TO MEDICAL DECISION-MAKING
    ROSEFSKY, JB
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1976, 295 (22): : 1265 - 1265
  • [40] Possibilistic decision-making approaches
    Guo, Peijun
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING (ISKE 2007), 2007,