Decision-making for the selection of different leachate treatment/management methods: the ANP and PROMETHEE approaches

被引:0
|
作者
Alp Özdemir
Aysun Özkan
Zerrin Günkaya
Müfide Banar
机构
[1] Eskişehir Technical University,Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering
[2] İki Eylül Campus,undefined
关键词
Analytic network process (ANP); Leachate treatment; Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM); Preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations (PROMETHEE);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Municipal solid waste (MSW) landfill leachate is a highly contaminated liquid effluent. Leachate has a complex nature that needs to be appropriately treated before being discharged into the environment. There are various options for leachate treatment. Deciding which option should be applied is a complex process, since it depends on many factors that need to provide a balance between the technical, economic, and environmental aspects of sustainability. Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods are useful techniques to solve complex problems that cannot be easily solved. In this study, MCDM techniques are used for an evaluation of four different leachate treatment options: recirculation of leachate to a landfill site (A1), combined treatment with municipal wastewater (A2), anaerobic and aerobic sequential treatment (A3), and advanced leachate treatment based on membrane processes (A4). The selection of the most appropriate one, based on the criteria, analytic network process (ANP), and preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations (PROMETHEE) methods, was applied as MCDM techniques using the Super Decisions software and D-Sight software, respectively. Both the ANP and the PROMETHEE analysis results demonstrate that option A2 is the most appropriate for all of the decision-makers.
引用
收藏
页码:19798 / 19809
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Decision-making for the selection of different leachate treatment/management methods: the ANP and PROMETHEE approaches
    Ozdemir, Alp
    Ozkan, Aysun
    Gunkaya, Zerrin
    Banar, Mufide
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (16) : 19798 - 19809
  • [2] Decision-Making on Selection of Talent Management Methods in the Era of Digitalization
    Cai, Lihong
    Ji, Ying
    Wijekoon, Chethana
    Yuan, Yangyun
    SYSTEMS, 2023, 11 (09):
  • [3] Decision-making for the best selection of suppliers by using minor ANP
    Ozaki, Toshimasa
    Lo, Mei-Chen
    Kinoshita, Eizo
    Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2012, 23 (06) : 2171 - 2178
  • [4] Decision-making for the best selection of suppliers by using minor ANP
    Toshimasa Ozaki
    Mei-Chen Lo
    Eizo Kinoshita
    Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng
    Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2012, 23 : 2171 - 2178
  • [5] Supplier Selection Decision-making Method Based on ANP and TOPSIS Algorithm
    Guo, Wei
    Bai, Dan
    Pan, Hua-ping
    NINTH WUHAN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-BUSINESS, VOLS I-III, 2010, : 2502 - 2508
  • [6] Intervention thresholds for the treatment of osteoporosis: Comparison of different approaches to decision-making
    Epstein, RS
    Feng, W
    Hirsch, LJ
    Kelly, M
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1998, 8 : S22 - S27
  • [7] Decision-making on peri-implant mucositis management and treatment approaches
    Romito, Giuseppe A.
    Hassan, Mohamed A.
    do Amaral, Guilherme C. L. S.
    Villar, Cristina C.
    BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2024, 236 (10) : 797 - 801
  • [8] Integration of ELECTRE III and PROMETHEE II Decision-Making Methods with an Interval Approach: Application in Selection of Appropriate Structural Systems
    Balali, Vahid
    Zahraie, Banafsheh
    Roozbahani, Abbas
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2014, 28 (02) : 297 - 314
  • [9] Using multi-attribute decision-making approaches in the selection of a hospital management system
    Arasteh, Mohammad Ali
    Shamshirband, Shahaboddin
    Yee, Por Lip
    TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2018, 26 (02) : 279 - 295
  • [10] Decision-making methods for operational flood management
    Wojciechowska, K. A.
    FLOOD RECOVERY, INNOVATION AND RESPONSE II, 2010, 133 : 227 - 238