The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations

被引:0
|
作者
Andrea Rizzi
Travis Jensen
David R. Slochower
Matteo Aldeghi
Vytautas Gapsys
Dimitris Ntekoumes
Stefano Bosisio
Michail Papadourakis
Niel M. Henriksen
Bert L. de Groot
Zoe Cournia
Alex Dickson
Julien Michel
Michael K. Gilson
Michael R. Shirts
David L. Mobley
John D. Chodera
机构
[1] Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center,Computational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute
[2] Tri-Institutional Training Program in Computational Biology and Medicine,Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering
[3] University of Colorado Boulder,Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
[4] University of California,Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry
[5] San Diego,Biomedical Research Foundation
[6] Computational Biomolecular Dynamics Group,EaStCHEM School of Chemistry
[7] Academy of Athens,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
[8] University of Edinburgh,Department of Computational Mathematics, Science and Engineering
[9] Atomwise,Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Department of Chemistry
[10] Michigan State University,undefined
[11] Michigan State University,undefined
[12] University of California,undefined
关键词
SAMPL6; Host–guest; Binding affinity; Free energy calculations; Cucurbit[8]uril; Octa-acid; Sampling;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Approaches for computing small molecule binding free energies based on molecular simulations are now regularly being employed by academic and industry practitioners to study receptor-ligand systems and prioritize the synthesis of small molecules for ligand design. Given the variety of methods and implementations available, it is natural to ask how the convergence rates and final predictions of these methods compare. In this study, we describe the concept and results for the SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge, the first challenge from the SAMPL series focusing on the assessment of convergence properties and reproducibility of binding free energy methodologies. We provided parameter files, partial charges, and multiple initial geometries for two octa-acid (OA) and one cucurbit[8]uril (CB8) host–guest systems. Participants submitted binding free energy predictions as a function of the number of force and energy evaluations for seven different alchemical and physical-pathway (i.e., potential of mean force and weighted ensemble of trajectories) methodologies implemented with the GROMACS, AMBER, NAMD, or OpenMM simulation engines. To rank the methods, we developed an efficiency statistic based on bias and variance of the free energy estimates. For the two small OA binders, the free energy estimates computed with alchemical and potential of mean force approaches show relatively similar variance and bias as a function of the number of energy/force evaluations, with the attach-pull-release (APR), GROMACS expanded ensemble, and NAMD double decoupling submissions obtaining the greatest efficiency. The differences between the methods increase when analyzing the CB8-quinine system, where both the guest size and correlation times for system dynamics are greater. For this system, nonequilibrium switching (GROMACS/NS-DS/SB) obtained the overall highest efficiency. Surprisingly, the results suggest that specifying force field parameters and partial charges is insufficient to generally ensure reproducibility, and we observe differences between seemingly converged predictions ranging approximately from 0.3 to 1.0 kcal/mol, even with almost identical simulations parameters and system setup (e.g., Lennard-Jones cutoff, ionic composition). Further work will be required to completely identify the exact source of these discrepancies. Among the conclusions emerging from the data, we found that Hamiltonian replica exchange—while displaying very small variance—can be affected by a slowly-decaying bias that depends on the initial population of the replicas, that bidirectional estimators are significantly more efficient than unidirectional estimators for nonequilibrium free energy calculations for systems considered, and that the Berendsen barostat introduces non-negligible artifacts in expanded ensemble simulations.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 633
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Improving the efficiency and reliability of free energy perturbation calculations using overlap sampling methods
    Lu, ND
    Kofke, DA
    Woolf, TB
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 25 (01) : 28 - 39
  • [42] Octanol-water partition coefficient measurements for the SAMPL6 blind prediction challenge
    Isik, Mehtap
    Levorse, Dorothy
    Mobley, David L.
    Rhodes, Timothy
    Chodera, John D.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2020, 34 (04) : 405 - 420
  • [43] pKameasurements for the SAMPL6 prediction challenge for a set of kinase inhibitor-like fragments
    Isik, Mehtap
    Levorse, Dorothy
    Rustenburg, Arien S.
    Ndukwe, Ikenna E.
    Wang, Heather
    Wang, Xiao
    Reibarkh, Mikhail
    Martin, Gary E.
    Makarov, Alexey A.
    Mobley, David L.
    Rhodes, Timothy
    Chodera, John D.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2018, 32 (10) : 1117 - 1138
  • [44] Prediction of the n-octanol/water partition coefficients in the SAMPL6 blind challenge from MST continuum solvation calculations
    Zamora, William J.
    Pinheiro, Silvana
    German, Kilian
    Rafols, Clara
    Curutchet, Carles
    Javier Luque, F.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2020, 34 (04) : 443 - 451
  • [45] Prediction of CB[8] host–guest binding free energies in SAMPL6 using the double-decoupling method
    Kyungreem Han
    Phillip S. Hudson
    Michael R. Jones
    Naohiro Nishikawa
    Florentina Tofoleanu
    Bernard R. Brooks
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2018, 32 : 1059 - 1073
  • [46] Overview of the SAMPL6 pKa challenge: evaluating small molecule microscopic and macroscopic pKa predictions
    Mehtap Işık
    Ariën S. Rustenburg
    Andrea Rizzi
    M. R. Gunner
    David L. Mobley
    John D. Chodera
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2021, 35 : 131 - 166
  • [47] SAMPL6 challenge results from pKa predictions based on a general Gaussian process model
    Bannan, Caitlin C.
    Mobley, David L.
    Skillman, A. Geoffrey
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2018, 32 (10) : 1165 - 1177
  • [48] The SAMPL6 challenge on predicting aqueous pKa values from EC-RISM theory
    Nicolas Tielker
    Lukas Eberlein
    Stefan Güssregen
    Stefan M. Kast
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2018, 32 : 1151 - 1163
  • [49] Detailed potential of mean force studies on host–guest systems from the SAMPL6 challenge
    Lin Frank Song
    Nupur Bansal
    Zheng Zheng
    Kenneth M. Merz
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2018, 32 : 1013 - 1026
  • [50] Absolute and relative pKa predictions via a DFT approach applied to the SAMPL6 blind challenge
    Zeng, Qiao
    Jones, Michael R.
    Brooks, Bernard R.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2018, 32 (10) : 1179 - 1189