What are the health and well-being impacts of community gardening for adults and children: A mixed method systematic review protocol

被引:37
|
作者
Lovell R. [1 ]
Husk K. [1 ]
Bethel A. [2 ]
Garside R. [1 ]
机构
[1] European Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Truro
[2] NIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC), Veysey Building, Salmon Pool Lane, Exeter
关键词
Community garden; Health; Mixed method; Quality of life; Volunteer; Wellbeing;
D O I
10.1186/2047-2382-3-20
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Community gardening is defined by its shared nature; gardeners work collectively to manage a garden for shared benefit. Although communal gardening activities, and recognition of their perceived benefits have a long history, it is in recent years that interest has developed in assessing the potential of the approach to address many of the threats to health and wellbeing faced by global populations. Community gardening may address chronic and non-communicable disease through the provision of opportunities for physical activity, improved nutrition and reduced stress. Participation in the gardening activities may improve wellbeing through increased social contact, culturally valued activities and mitigation of food poverty. The benefits of community gardening are argued to extend beyond the participants themselves through more coherent and cohesive communities, improved physical environments and the sharing of the products of the labour. While there are many claims made and an emerging body of research, no previous systematic review has sought to identify and synthesise the evidence in a global context. Methods: The objectives of the mixed method systematic review are to understand the health and wellbeing impacts of active participation in community gardening. Both quantitative and qualitative evidence will be sought using a broad and diverse search strategy to address the four review questions: 1) does active involvement in community gardening lead to improved health or wellbeing; 2) if so, how does active involvement in community gardening affect health and wellbeing; 3) are there different impacts for different population groups (for instance according to age, socio-economic status or sex); and 4) do different types of community gardening (for example producing vegetables or a flower garden) or in different contexts have different types of impacts? A theoretical framework, informed by an initial theory of change model, will illustrate the outcomes of participation and any mechanisms of action (i.e. how such impacts are achieved). The synthesis will be sensitive to factors which may affect the impacts, such as the context of the activities, the demographics of participants, and the implementation and specifics of the community gardening interventions. © 2014 Lovell et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Protocol for a systematic review of instruments for the assessment of quality of life and well-being in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy
    Mpundu-Kaambwa, Christine
    Chen, Gang
    Huynh, Elisabeth
    Russo, Remo
    Ratcliffe, Julie
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (09):
  • [42] Protocol: The promotion of well-being among children exposed to intimate partner violence: a systematic review of interventions
    Latzman, Natasha E.
    Casanueva, Cecilia
    Brinton, Julia
    Forman-Hoffman, Valerie L.
    [J]. CAMPBELL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, 14 (01)
  • [43] Socio-Psychological Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing on Community Health and Well-Being
    Soyer, Mehmet
    Kaminski, Kylen
    Ziyanak, Sebahattin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (04)
  • [44] Adolescent mental wellness: a systematic review protocol of instruments measuring general mental health and well-being
    Orth, Zaida
    van Wyk, Brian
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (08):
  • [45] Initiatives addressing precarious employment and its effects on workers' health and well-being: a protocol for a systematic review
    Gunn, Virginia
    Hakansta, Carin
    Vignola, Emilia
    Matilla-Santander, Nuria
    Kreshpaj, Bertina
    Wegman, David H.
    Hogstedt, Christer
    Ahonen, Emily Q.
    Muntaner, Carles
    Baron, Sherry
    Bodin, Theo
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [46] Initiatives addressing precarious employment and its effects on workers’ health and well-being: a protocol for a systematic review
    Virginia Gunn
    Carin Håkansta
    Emilia Vignola
    Nuria Matilla-Santander
    Bertina Kreshpaj
    David H. Wegman
    Christer Hogstedt
    Emily Q. Ahonen
    Carles Muntaner
    Sherry Baron
    Theo Bodin
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 10
  • [47] eHealth Tools That Assess and Track Health and Well-being in Children and Young People: Systematic Review
    Stewart, Elizabeth
    Milton, Alyssa
    Yee, Hannah Frances
    Song, Michael Jae
    Roberts, Anna
    Davenport, Tracey
    Hickie, Ian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (05)
  • [48] What are the impacts of sugarcane production on ecosystem services and human well-being? A review
    El Chami, Daniel
    Daccache, Andre
    El Moujabber, Maroun
    [J]. ANNALS OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2020, 65 (02): : 188 - 199
  • [49] How is the Capability Approach Applied to Assess Well-being Impacts? A Systematic Review
    Bartolomei, Livia
    Blundo-Canto, Genowefa
    De Muro, Pasquale
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENT AND CAPABILITIES, 2024, 25 (03) : 367 - 399
  • [50] What evidence exists for the impact of Baltic Sea ecosystems on human health and well-being? A systematic map protocol
    Storie, Joanna
    Suskevics, Monika
    Kulvik, Mart
    Lehtoranta, Virpi
    Vikstrom, Suvi
    Riikonen, Simo
    Kuosa, Harri
    Kuhn, Kristin
    Oinonen, Soile
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL EVIDENCE, 2020, 9 (01)