Efficacy and safety of remimazolam besylate versus propofol during hysteroscopy: single-centre randomized controlled trial (vol 21, 156, 2021)

被引:19
|
作者
Zhang, Xiaoqiang [1 ]
Li, Shuang [1 ]
Liu, Jing [1 ]
机构
[1] Mengcheng Cty 1 Peoples Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Mengcheng 233500, Anhui, Peoples R China
关键词
Anaesthesia; Benzodiazepine; Hysteroscopy; Propofol; Remifentanil; Remimazolam besylate;
D O I
10.1186/s12871-021-01390-x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Remimazolam besylate is a newer benzodiazepine with characteristics of quick onset of effects, short maintenance and recovery times without accumulation in tissues. This trial was conducted to confirm the efficacy and safety of remimazolam besylate versus propofol during hysteroscopy. Methods: Patients undergoing hysteroscopy were randomly assigned to either the remimazolam (Group R) or the propofol group (Group P). Group R was administered an induction dose of 0.2 mg/kg and a maintenance dosage of 1.0 mg/kg/h. In Group P, propofol was started at 1.5–2.0 mg/kg and then maintained at 3.0–6.0 mg/kg/h. After remimazolam besylate or propofol induction, remifentanil was infused using a target-controlled infusion system with a target concentration of 1.5 ng/ml and titrated during the procedure. The incidence rates of injection pain, low oxygen saturation (SpO2) and adverse effects in both groups were compared. Results: Eighty-two patients were included in this study. The incidence of adverse events in Group R (3.7%) was significantly lower than that in Group P (36.6%) (p < 0.001). The incidence of injection pain in Group P (80.5%) was much higher than that in Group R (2.4%) (p < 0.001). The incidence of other adverse events, such as low SpO2, bradycardia, and hypotension in Group R was lower than that in Group P (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Remimazolam besylate proves to be a safer alternative for anesthesia during hysteroscopy. Moreover, adverse events caused by propofol, such as low SpO2 and injection pain, are largely avoided. Trial registration: This study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Mengcheng County No. 1 People’s Hospital (2020MYL20003) and registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn (15/09/2020, ChiCTR-2000038252). The study protocol followed the CONSORT guidelines. The study protocol was performed in the relevant guidelines. © 2021, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosylate for sedation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial
    Huichen Zhu
    Zhongxue Su
    Xiaorong Huai
    Caiyang Chen
    Xiao Zhang
    Jie Zhou
    Diansan Su
    Trials, 23
  • [42] Efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosylate for sedation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial
    Zhu, Huichen
    Su, Zhongxue
    Huai, Xiaorong
    Chen, Caiyang
    Zhang, Xiao
    Zhou, Jie
    Su, Diansan
    TRIALS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [43] Safety and efficacy of target-controlled infusion versus intermittent bolus administration of propofol for sedation in colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial
    Cuiabano, Igor Seror
    Garbin, Priscila de Miranda
    Modolo, Norma Sueli Pinheiro
    do Nascimento Junior, Paulo
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2023, 73 (06): : 751 - 757
  • [44] A single-centre experience with cyclosporine microemulsion versus tacrolimus in 100 randomized liver transplant recipients:: Midterm efficacy and safety
    Loinaz, C
    Marin, LM
    González-Pinto, I
    Gómez, R
    Jiménez, C
    Moreno, E
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (7-8) : 3439 - 3441
  • [45] Comparative, single-centre, randomized, placebo-controlled study of efficacy and safety of flupirtine and celecoxib in CPPS/CP IIIB
    Kogan, M., I
    Belousov, I. I.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2012, 11 (01) : E45 - U377
  • [46] Comparison of propofol versus propofol-ketamine combination for sedation during spinal anesthesia in children: randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety
    Singh, Rabinder
    Batra, Yatindra K.
    Bharti, Neerja
    Panda, Nidhi B.
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2010, 20 (05) : 439 - 444
  • [47] Long-term sedation with remimazolam besylate versus propofol in critically ill patients during invasive mechanical ventilation: a study protocol for a multicenter randomized non-inferior trial
    Yang, Xiaobo
    Tang, Yun
    Du, Ruofei
    Yu, Yuan
    Xu, Jiqian
    Zhang, Jiancheng
    Liu, Hong
    Zou, Xiaojing
    Ren, Lehao
    Yuan, Shiying
    Shang, You
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [48] Effect of remimazolam vs. propofol on hemodynamics during general anesthesia induction in elderly patients: Single-center, randomized controlled trial
    He, Mingfeng
    Gong, Chanjuan
    Chen, Yinan
    Chen, Rongting
    Qian, Yanning
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 38 (01): : 66 - 75
  • [49] Effect of remimazolam vs. propofol on hemodynamics during general anesthesia induction in elderly patients: Single-center,randomized controlled trial
    Mingfeng He
    Chanjuan Gong
    Yinan Chen
    Rongting Chen
    Yanning Qian
    The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2024, 38 (01) : 66 - 75
  • [50] Hypotension after general anaesthesia induction using remimazolam or propofol in geriatric patients undergoing sevoflurane anaesthesia with remifentanil: a single-centre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial
    Takaki, Ryuki
    Yokose, Masashi
    Mihara, Takahiro
    Saigusa, Yusuke
    Tanaka, Hiroyuki
    Yamamoto, Natsuhiro
    Masui, Kenichi
    Goto, Takahisa
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 133 (01) : 24 - 32