Prognostic Factors in Primary Vaginal Cancer: A Single Institute Experience and Review of Literature

被引:5
|
作者
Prameela C.G. [1 ]
Ravind R. [1 ]
Gurram B.C. [1 ]
Sheejamol V.S. [2 ]
Dinesh M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Radiation Oncology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre, Kochi, Kerala
[2] Department of Biostatistics, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre, Kochi, Kerala
关键词
External beam radiation; Primary vaginal cancer; Prognostic factors; Tumour grade; Vaginal brachytherapy;
D O I
10.1007/s13224-015-0697-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Primary vaginal carcinoma is rare, accounting for 1–2 % of all gynecological malignancies. Being rare, most observations are based on retrospective and comparative analyses. This study was aimed to retrospectively analyze the prognostic factors and its relevance in the outcomes of primary vaginal cancers. Materials: Medical records of all cases of primary vaginal cancers, presented to Department of Oncology, from 2004 to 2012, at a tertiary care center in southern India, were retrieved from electronic medical records, and were analyzed. Results: The total number of cases was 32. Median age at presentation was 64.28 years. Squamous histology accounted for 84.4 %, with the rest being adenocarcinoma. Surgery was offered for five (15.6 %), and concurrent chemotherapy for 14 (43.8 %) patients. Three patients had only surgery. All others received radiotherapy. Twenty received external beam radiation (EBRT) and vaginal brachytherapy (VBT); seven only EBRT and two, adjuvant radiation. Five patients had residual disease; two, stage III, and three stage IV. Median follow-up was 55.83 months. Twelve patients were alive at last follow-up (37.5 %), while 14 were dead (43.8 %—8 of disease and 6 of other causes). Six patients were lost to follow-up (18.8 %). Twenty patients were disease free. Seven had recurrence, three loco-regional and four distant. Median overall survival (OS) was 86.1 months, disease-free survival (DFS) 90.17 months, and disease-specific survival (DSS) 97.13 months. When well and moderately differentiated tumors were taken together, the 5-year OS, DFS, and DSS rates were, 56.6, 64.3, and 82.3 %. For poorly differentiated tumors, median OS, DFS, and DSS were, 20.9, 14.6, and 20.9 months, with statistically significant advantage for better grade tumors, for DSS (p 0.050). Better 5-year OS, DFS, and DSS rates were observed for stage I + II group, with 54.9, 79.8, and 78.9 %, compared with advanced stage where the same were 54.8, 38.2, and 68.6 % (DFS—p 0.003, DSS—p 0.009). Grade and stage of tumor had statistically significant predictive value over the outcomes, while tumor size showed a significant trend. Patients treated with combination of EBRT and VBT fared well. Conclusion: Our study could conclude that grade of differentiation was a significant predictor of poor survival as was stage of disease. Combination of VBT and external beam radiotherapy provides good DFS. © 2015, Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 371
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Glioblastoma Multiforme With Poor Prognostic Factors - a Prospective Randomized Single Institute Experience
    Behera, M.
    Dutta, S.
    Julka, P. K.
    Sharma, D. N.
    Rath, G. K.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 47 : S585 - S585
  • [42] Prognostic factors in nonmetastatic HER2 'low' & HER2 'negative' breast cancer: Single institute experience
    Turkel, A.
    Dogan, M.
    Sertesen, E.
    Karacin, C.
    Irkkan, S. C.
    Ates, O.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2023, 34 : S299 - S300
  • [43] Outcome and Prognostic Factors of High Risk Neuroblastoma in Low Income Countries in National Cancer Institute, Egypt: Single Center Experience
    Ibrahiem, A.
    Fawzy, M.
    Elhussieny, M.
    Fathalla, A.
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2019, 66 : S326 - S326
  • [44] Primary testicular lymphoma-A single center experience and review of literature
    Chen, Wei-Jen
    Kuo, Junne-Yih
    Lin, Chih-Chieh
    Chung, Hsiao-Jen
    Huang, William J. S.
    Wu, Howard H. H.
    Chang, Yen-Hwa
    Lin, Alex T. L.
    Chen, Kuang-Kuo
    UROLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 27 (02) : 96 - 100
  • [45] Primary neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast A single Center experience and review of the literature
    Locurto, Paolo
    Antona, Angelo Danilo
    Grillo, Antonietta
    Ciulla, Antonio
    Martorana, Stefania
    Cipolla, Calogero
    Graceffa, Giuseppa
    Vieni, Salvatore
    ANNALI ITALIANI DI CHIRURGIA, 2017, 88 (02) : 116 - 121
  • [46] Postmenopausal vaginal bleeding as initial presentation of gastric cancer: a case report with literature review of prognostic factors and treatment of krukenberg tumor
    Kumar, Mehandar
    Kumar, Abhishek
    Maroules, Michael
    Abrina, Vanessa
    Kumar, Vinod
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2016, 4 (04)
  • [47] Prognostic factors in sudden sensorineural hearing loss: Our experience and a review of the literature
    Narozny, Waldemar
    Kuczkowski, Jerzy
    Kot, Jacek
    Stankiewicz, Czeslaw
    Sicko, Zdzislaw
    Mikaszewski, Boguslaw
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2006, 115 (07): : 553 - 558
  • [48] Prognostic factors in patients with carcinoma of the vulva - our own experience and literature review
    Blecharz, P.
    Karolewski, K.
    Bieda, T.
    Klimek, M.
    Pudelek, J.
    Kojs, E.
    Zur, K.
    Dzialak, P.
    Urbanski, K.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 29 (03) : 260 - 263
  • [49] Independent prognostic factors in endometrial cancer: a single institution review
    Uharcek, P.
    Mlyncek, M.
    Ravinger, J.
    Lajtman, E.
    Matejka, M.
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 6 (03): : 294 - 299
  • [50] Outcomes and prognostic factors in gallbladder cancer: a single-centre experience
    Cziupka, Katharina
    Partecke, Lars Ivo
    Mirow, Lutz
    Heidecke, Claus-Dieter
    Emde, Christian
    Hoffmann, Wolfgang
    Siewert, Ulrike
    van den Berg, Neeltje
    von Bernstorff, Wolfram
    Stier, Albrecht
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2012, 397 (06) : 899 - 907