A parameter model for dredge plume sediment source terms

被引:0
|
作者
Boudewijn Decrop
Tom De Mulder
Erik Toorman
Marc Sas
机构
[1] IMDC,Coastal and Estuarine Section
[2] Hydraulics Laboratory,undefined
[3] Ghent University,undefined
[4] Department of Civil Engineering,undefined
[5] Hydraulics Laboratory,undefined
[6] KU Leuven,undefined
[7] Department of Civil Engineering,undefined
来源
Ocean Dynamics | 2017年 / 67卷
关键词
CFD; Dredging; Turbidity; Plumes;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The presented model allows for fast simulations of the near-field behaviour of overflow dredging plumes. Overflow dredging plumes occur when dredging vessels employ a dropshaft release system to discharge the excess sea water, which is pumped into the trailing suction hopper dredger (TSHD) along with the dredged sediments. The fine sediment fraction in the loaded water-sediment mixture does not fully settle before it reaches the overflow shaft. By consequence, the released water contains a fine sediment fraction of time-varying concentration. The sediment grain size is in the range of clays, silt and fine sand; the sediment concentration varies roughly between 10 and 200 g/l in most cases, peaking at even higher value with short duration. In order to assess the environmental impact of the increased turbidity caused by this release, plume dispersion predictions are often carried out. These predictions are usually executed with a large-scale model covering a complete coastal zone, bay, or estuary. A source term of fine sediments is implemented in the hydrodynamic model to simulate the fine sediment dispersion. The large-scale model mesh resolution and governing equations, however, do not allow to simulate the near-field plume behaviour in the vicinity of the ship hull and propellers. Moreover, in the near-field, these plumes are under influence of buoyancy forces and air bubbles. The initial distribution of sediments is therefore unknown and has to be based on crude assumptions at present. The initial (vertical) distribution of the sediment source is indeed of great influence on the final far-field plume dispersion results. In order to study this near-field behaviour, a highly-detailed computationally fluid dynamics (CFD) model was developed. This model contains a realistic geometry of a dredging vessel, buoyancy effects, air bubbles and propeller action, and was validated earlier by comparing with field measurements. A CFD model requires significant simulation times, which is not available in all situations. For example, to allow correct representation of overflow plume dispersion in a real-time forecasting model, a fast assessment of the near-field behaviour is needed. For this reason, a semi-analytical parameter model has been developed that reproduces the near-field sediment dispersion obtained with the CFD model in a relatively accurate way. In this paper, this so-called grey-box model is presented.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 146
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] General plume dispersion model (GPDM) for point source emission
    Awasthi, Seema
    Khare, Mukesh
    Gargava, Prashant
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING & ASSESSMENT, 2006, 11 (03) : 267 - 276
  • [22] TOWARD THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 3-DIMENSIONAL HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENT TRANSPORT MODEL FOR DREDGE DISPOSAL MOUND MANAGEMENT
    SCHMALZ, RA
    DEVELOPMENTS IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED MECHANICS, VOL 14, 1988, 14 : 160 - 167
  • [23] Response of the seagrass Halophila ovalis to altered light quality in a simulated dredge plume
    Strydom, Simone
    McMahon, Kathryn
    Lavery, Paul S.
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2017, 121 (1-2) : 323 - 330
  • [24] PLUME SPACING AND SOURCE
    MARSH, BD
    NATURE, 1975, 256 (5514) : 240 - 240
  • [25] Designing dredge: engaging the sediment landscapes of the Great Lakes Basin
    Burkholder, Sean
    JOURNAL OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, 2016, 11 (01) : 6 - 17
  • [26] A Numerical Method for Transient Tracking of Sediment Particles in Dredge Pump
    Guo T.
    Liu M.
    Cao L.
    Hu J.
    Hong G.
    You Y.
    Shanghai Jiaotong Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2022, 56 (05): : 656 - 663
  • [27] Estimation and propagation of volcanic source parameter uncertainty in an ash transport and dispersal model: application to the Eyjafjallajokull plume of 14–16 April 2010
    Marcus Bursik
    Matthew Jones
    Simon Carn
    Ken Dean
    Abani Patra
    Michael Pavolonis
    E. Bruce Pitman
    Tarunraj Singh
    Puneet Singla
    Peter Webley
    Halldor Bjornsson
    Maurizio Ripepe
    Bulletin of Volcanology, 2012, 74 : 2321 - 2338
  • [28] Cohesive Sediment Modeling in a Shallow Estuary: Model and Environmental Implications of Sediment Parameter Variation
    Allen, Rachel M.
    Lacy, Jessica R.
    Stevens, Andrew W.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2021, 126 (09)
  • [29] Numerical solution for a nonlinear diffusion model with source terms
    Jangveladze, Temur
    Kiguradze, Zurab
    Kratsashvili, Maia
    Neta, Beny
    GEORGIAN MATHEMATICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 30 (04) : 539 - 554
  • [30] Accurate Determination of Far-Field Source Terms of Barge Overflow Dredge Plumes Based on Near-Field Monitoring and Modeling
    de Wit, L.
    Mosca, C. A.
    Buschman, F. A.
    Jaksic, L.
    van der Deijl, E.
    van der Biezen, T.
    JOURNAL OF WATERWAY PORT COASTAL AND OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2025, 151 (02)