Predicting continence following radical prostatectomy.

被引:9
|
作者
Marsh D.W. [1 ]
Lepor H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Urology, New York University Medical Center, 540 First Avenue, New York, 10016, NY
关键词
Radical Prostatectomy; Stress Urinary Incontinence; Stress Incontinence; Localize Prostate Cancer; Catheter Removal;
D O I
10.1007/s11934-001-0087-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Stress urinary incontinence is a recognized complication following radical prostatectomy. Fortunately, in the hands of experienced surgeons, the overwhelming majority of men ultimately regain urinary continence following the procedure. Most men regain urinary continence 3 to 12 months after the prostatectomy. We have developed and validated a continence index that is administered at the time of catheter removal after radical prostatectomy. This index identifies those men who rapidly regain continence and men who will have permanent incontinence after prostatectomy. The study population was stratified into tertile groups based on the continence scores. At 3 months, 96%, 82%, and 68% of men in the highest, mid, and lowest tertile groups reported using no pads or one small pad. Based on these observations, we recommend initiating biofeedback immediately postoperatively in men with continence scores of 14 or less. At 1 year, 100%, 98%, and 87% of the men in the highest, mid, and lowest tertile group reported using no pads or only one small pad. Men who have continence scores greater than 14 can be assured that they will regain urinary continence within 1 year. To our knowledge, this index is the only validated instrument that predicts the return of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:248 / 252
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Analysis and synthesis of contributing factors: a unified concept - Comment
    BocconGibod, L
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 80 (03): : 451 - 451
  • [42] PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL TO EVALUATE THE INFLUENCE OF THE BLADDER NECK SUSPENSION ON EARLY CONTINENCE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY.
    Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
    Kallidonis, Panagiotis
    Nicolaus, Martin
    Dietel, Anja
    Do, Minh
    Haefner, Tim
    Liatsikos, Evangelos
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (04): : E755 - E755
  • [43] Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy.
    Begg, CB
    Riedel, ER
    Bach, PB
    Kattan, MW
    Schrag, D
    Warren, JL
    Scardino, PT
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (15): : 1138 - 1144
  • [44] Alprostadil for impotence after radical prostatectomy.
    Smith, JA
    Koch, MO
    Yerkes, EE
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (05): : 62 - 62
  • [45] Predicting time to metastatic progression from biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Dotan, ZA
    Bianco, FJ
    Scardino, PT
    Eastham, JA
    Fearn, P
    Scher, HI
    Kattan, MW
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (14) : 417S - 417S
  • [46] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The WA experience
    Dyer, J.
    Shannon, T.
    Sofield, D.
    Pemberton, R.
    Tan, A.
    Vivian, J.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 101 : 28 - 28
  • [47] Updated technique for transcoccygeal radical prostatectomy.
    Rigatti, P
    Da Pozzo, LF
    Colombo, R
    Montorsi, F
    Bocciardi, A
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (05): : 313 - 313
  • [48] Exclusively extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Adjiman, S
    Pansard, JL
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2002, 12 (06): : 1234 - 1239
  • [49] Resource utilization and outcomes of radical prostatectomy.
    Kramolowsky, EV
    Clement, DG
    Wood, NL
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (05): : 301 - 301
  • [50] Preoperative exercise interventions to optimize continence outcomes following radical prostatectomy
    Mungovan, Sean F.
    Carlsson, Sigrid V.
    Gass, Gregory C.
    Graham, Petra L.
    Sandhu, Jaspreet S.
    Akin, Oguz
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Eastham, James A.
    Patel, Manish I.
    NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2021, 18 (05) : 259 - 281